Simon O'Neill of VgamerZ.com discusses in depth how he believes Bloodborne's newest patch (1.04) has destroyed the very essence of Bloodborne.
Do you think this patch will have a positive or negative impact on the community and game? Let us know.
The Souls-like genre remains popular, along with FromSoftware's classics there are many contenders. But which are the best Souls-like games?
Hmm... In my opinion, the 7 best are the 6 made by FromSoftware (DeS, DS1, DS2, DS3, BB and ER), then Lies of P. But each to their own.
Saad from eXputer: "Almost a decade later, it's time to take the nostalgia goggles off and accept that Bloodborne has long been surpassed by its successors."
Yes, yes it does. It’s still a great game. Elden Ring isn’t better just different and a bit easier . I like that you have to be aggressive but smart in Bloodborne
"Sony is missing out on a hugely profitable opportunity by ignoring fan demands for a Bloodborne remaster and PC port," says Ahmed from eXputer.
Bloodborne came out on the PS4. It is owned by From Software. What missed opportunity? I am sure the people at From Software know what they are doing. Especially since they are hiring devs instead of laying them off.
Maybe do an article about that instead of writing a hit piece on them acting like they don't know how to run their business.
It will be a launch title on PS6 just like the remake of Demon's Souls for PS5 launch
Meh...
This is pathetic. Just to sum up this whiny article, the author is pissy because now players can co-op with you regardless of the oath or level...his argument is it's just a way for people to steamroll their way through the game and it takes away the 'satisfaction of beating the game all by yourself with no help'. -well i'd disagree. It gives the game a better social aspect. If I'm a level 80 and i have a friend who's just starting out and wants some help, I should be able to help him if he wants it.
Another issue he has is the 2v1 or 3v1 gank spanking scenarios when you invade other worlds. -Well, when you decide to invade another worlds, you run the risk of the master having a couple friends along. That's how it's been since dark souls(could've also been DS but i don't remember).
His last complaint is being summoned while the master of the world is fighting the boss with a high leveled friend who beats the boss quickly, thus runs the risk of missing out on the fight if you're far away from the fog door- that's why you ring your bell right next to the fog door.. It's not hard, and who knows you might invade a NG+ world.
I don't see why this guy has an issue with any of this. BB is meant to be a more streamlined. Besides it's only co-op that was most changed. Be grateful you can't invade at any level.
Its a difficult one - I generally think they've made it better for the average player by making the changes but there's no way you can do that without making it worse for certain types of player who liked a certain aspect a particular way.
Being able to play with your friends at any point far outweighs any downside to this so-called "issue". It has zero effect on any player outside those directly involved except in a single instance: where you invade a player and now have to deal with his higher level friend. In which case, the invader risks nothing for invading regardless. You still can't be invaded by higher level players yourself.
This is nothing but an "on principle" complaint for the elitist who doesn't want players to be able to make the game easier for themselves. If that's what they want to do, who cares?
This article is fundamentally brain damaging