420°

Why Bloodborne's Patch 1.04 Is Fundamentally Damaging

Simon O'Neill of VgamerZ.com discusses in depth how he believes Bloodborne's newest patch (1.04) has destroyed the very essence of Bloodborne.

Do you think this patch will have a positive or negative impact on the community and game? Let us know.

Crimzon3255d ago

Ditto.

It's just sad seeing someone whine that people can co-op with higher level players now provided they have a password. So what if they can? If it makes the game more enjoyable for them that's only a good thing. It doesn't affect me, and it doesn't affect the author of this article either.

The utterly bizarre obsession some people have with the difficulty of these games makes me cringe. One of the greatest innovations with this series (I'm referring to all the Souls games and Bloodborne) is the online play, which was quite frankly revolutionary. Considering they're a Japanese developer, it's astounding that From Software were thinking outside the box so long ago and brought true innovations to gaming such as the concept of invading other players worlds. Either way you cut it, online play is a huge part of these games and if From Software want to make it slightly easier for friends to play together, than who cares, really?

I completed this game long ago, and I'm sure that the author of this article did as well. Getting upset because newer players might have it easier than you is just pathetic. Let them enjoy the game.

icaruslives3255d ago

I question whether you even bothered to read a single line of the article before saying that it doesn't affect me. Of course it affects me, and it will affect almost everyone who likes to do PVP or co-op, in ways you might not have thought about.

ReconHope3255d ago (Edited 3255d ago )

I agree with this article. PVP is pretty much broken. But I guess people will just strug it off as elitist whining. Sigh. The decline of Soul Games begin and the catering of casuals continues.

The truth is the whining of the so called "Elitist" are people with legit concerns that this patch has broken PVP for lower level characters by opening up a world of Twinking.

SanctuaryExitia3255d ago

Honestly are you guys reading the article at all? It goes into great detail how it affects other players not only in pvp but in coop as well.

Bimkoblerutso3255d ago

People disagreeing do not seem to understand that really, really low level characters can now easily obtain ridiculous equipment very early on. It completely unbalances PVP.

I like that cooping in easier, really I do. But there should have been some kind of scaling put in place so people can't exploit the game so easily.

ReconHope3255d ago (Edited 3255d ago )

No Bimbko. Stop speaking that logic. They will just phantom disagree anyway, with no explanation. The only good argument I have heard supporting this patch is that Billy and BoB can now coop together so it completely outweighs the negatives of unbalancing PVP(sigh).

People need to look up twinking and understand that it's never a good thing for any game or series.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

MysticStrummer3254d ago

The definitions of "broken" and "unbalanced" have changed apparently. This doesn't break or unbalance anything, people are just mad that new players could have an easier time obtaining certain items. Moving on to the next imaginary crisis.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3254d ago
llxKonanxll3255d ago

This is pathetic. Just to sum up this whiny article, the author is pissy because now players can co-op with you regardless of the oath or level...his argument is it's just a way for people to steamroll their way through the game and it takes away the 'satisfaction of beating the game all by yourself with no help'. -well i'd disagree. It gives the game a better social aspect. If I'm a level 80 and i have a friend who's just starting out and wants some help, I should be able to help him if he wants it.

Another issue he has is the 2v1 or 3v1 gank spanking scenarios when you invade other worlds. -Well, when you decide to invade another worlds, you run the risk of the master having a couple friends along. That's how it's been since dark souls(could've also been DS but i don't remember).

His last complaint is being summoned while the master of the world is fighting the boss with a high leveled friend who beats the boss quickly, thus runs the risk of missing out on the fight if you're far away from the fog door- that's why you ring your bell right next to the fog door.. It's not hard, and who knows you might invade a NG+ world.

I don't see why this guy has an issue with any of this. BB is meant to be a more streamlined. Besides it's only co-op that was most changed. Be grateful you can't invade at any level.

icaruslives3255d ago

It's obvious you didn't bother reading what I was saying beyond my initial "points", considering I made more than 3 and you neglected half of what I said so let me clarify.

1) The game is not meant to be a social game and of course you can help your friend. It's called boot up skype and make a character with him, you guys will have a great time slaying beasts together without it being a cheese-fest where he loses out on experiencing the game because you slaughter everything for him in 1 shot. If you want to play with your friend so badly, it'd be infinitely more fun if you both go through the game together with the balance in tact. This way is pointless.

2)the gank squads thing I'm against is because before it was just a normal 3v1, or 2v1. Everyone would be in a fair level range with fair gear depending on where you are in the game. Now, the ganks will consist of host level 20, and his two buddies level 200 and 250, while I or you are level 20 as well. Do you not see the problem with this?

3) That's not at all what I said. I said you get no satisfaction in killing a boss because even if you're at the fog, people can now 2 shot bosses so you all go in and it's over before the music even starts.

If you don't agree with me and think I'm whiny that is your opinion and I respect that, but don't try to sum up a 1500 word piece and neglect half of the key points I tried to make just to throw people away.

I expected a lot of hate with this as I said in my piece about the community loving this patch, but I am mainly posting this for CONSTRUCTIVE discussions, not angry responses.

Have a good night.

llxKonanxll3255d ago

It's not an 'angry discussion'. I'm just pointing out that your criticisms are weak.

M1ST4K33255d ago (Edited 3255d ago )

They are valid points. Their fixes violate the initial game design.

IMO, they couldn't bother going through the amount of work that it would take to fix the matchmaking and simply bumped the level range so you are constantly finding matches... but every match is unfair (specially regarding PvP).

I love blood borne's single player... Have played a lot of PvP too... I have more than 200h already on the game. But I think I'm done with the game... will keep playing it from time to time (DLC coming :D ) but nowhere up to the time I "wasted" on DS1 / DS2.

DragonDDark3255d ago

You make it sound that summoning is not optional..

Gazondaily3255d ago

@llxKonanxll

"It's not an 'angry discussion'. I'm just pointing out that your criticisms are weak."

Really? Because when you start off your post like this:

"This is pathetic. Just to sum up this whiny article, the author is pissy"

Then how on earth can you say that your sentiments don't come off as 'angry'?

Masterofwiiu3ds3255d ago

The patch has done 1 thing for me. It allows me to play with my buddy who is just starting out. Before, it wasn't even a consideration.

This one positive outweighs the sum of all the negatives the patch brings with it. By a huge margin.

gangsta_red3255d ago

The patch pretty much dissolves what made Bloodborne so great in the first place.

Massahud3255d ago

1) The game is meant to be social, it even reminds a social network where you can leave messages to other users and like/dislike those messages.

2) Even before patch 1.04 it was a high risk ring the sinister bell at level 20. You could enter in a level 50 player game with two level 80 friends, considering the lvl difference. And they can add some calculation using the level of all players to limit the invasor level.

3) It's the player choice if he want an easy experience with his high level friend helping him, maybe he just wants to see the plot, or does not have enough skill for bloodborne.

I for myself wouldn't summon a high level friend because you have to up your own playing skills and reflexes while you play this game.

generic-user-name3255d ago

IMO your only valid complaint is point 2. Point 1 and point 3 have zero effect on anyone unless they willingly allow it and if they willingly allow it, that's their business, none of yours.

MysticStrummer3254d ago

@gangsta - This does nothing to what makes Bloodborne so great.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3254d ago
mixelon3255d ago

Its a difficult one - I generally think they've made it better for the average player by making the changes but there's no way you can do that without making it worse for certain types of player who liked a certain aspect a particular way.

Celeras3255d ago

Being able to play with your friends at any point far outweighs any downside to this so-called "issue". It has zero effect on any player outside those directly involved except in a single instance: where you invade a player and now have to deal with his higher level friend. In which case, the invader risks nothing for invading regardless. You still can't be invaded by higher level players yourself.

This is nothing but an "on principle" complaint for the elitist who doesn't want players to be able to make the game easier for themselves. If that's what they want to do, who cares?

icaruslives3255d ago

There is a huge difference between making it less difficult through things like normal co-operation, and making it easy by going online and getting a glitcher who has a super high level character to beat the game for you.

It's Bloodborne, it's not some random game. It thrives because of it's challenge and difficulty. It's designed to be fair in a way that once you learn the game and overcome what it offers, it is no longer crushingly difficult and in turn you reap the endless satisfaction.

Why as a Souls fan yourself, would you want people to infinitely cheese the game when they miss out? I don't understand the mindset.

Also, "being able to play with friends at any point", you mean how we could before?

My favourite thing to do with my friends is co-op the game together. It's not hard at all, the patch only does one thing, it enables your end-game character to help someones new game character.

If you guys want to play with your friends, you could do that and have absolutely no trouble connecting. Use Skype too, it's fun times. Just start a character with them and enjoy the challenge together. Why is that a bad thing that needs fixing?

Why do you insist on needing your level 120+ NG+ character to make the game such a cakewalk that your apparent cherished friend won't be able to even see some of the BEST PARTS about the series you apparently want him to enjoy.

It makes little to no sense to me.

goldwyncq3255d ago

There are many ways to enjoy what the game has to offer. If someone chooses to summon a high-leveled player for aid, then let them be. How does that affect your personal enjoyment of the game? Not everyone plays for the same reason as you do, please keep that in mind.

sereal_killer3255d ago

i agree.
People just dont want their game ruined or i think more the image of their game ruined but it has little effect on their game.

If they want to go get a friend and beat the game the ez way let them they paid for it.

Yo can also have glitched your way thru the game the "proper" way.

Sure invading now might be a little harsher with the chance but i thought that's what you wanted , more challenge ....

die_fiend3255d ago

This article is fundamentally brain damaging

Show all comments (45)
140°

The 7 Best Souls-Like Games - Mastering the Challenge

The Souls-like genre remains popular, along with FromSoftware's classics there are many contenders. But which are the best Souls-like games?

toxic-inferno23d ago

Hmm... In my opinion, the 7 best are the 6 made by FromSoftware (DeS, DS1, DS2, DS3, BB and ER), then Lies of P. But each to their own.

kevco3323d ago

Still DS1? You don't feel it's been surpassed yet?

Demon's Souls has the remake of course, but DS1 has surely been outdated?

Smellsforfree23d ago

I think that the DS1 remake is better looking than DS2. The interior lighting matched with the low resolution textures in DS2 is very garish, IMO.

Besides graphics, what do you mean by DS1 being "outdated"? I'm someone who played through Elden Ring and just recently played through the DS series, and as far as gameplay went, there were all very similar.

Cacabunga23d ago

I haven’t played many but Bloodborne and NIOH1 are on top of my list.. had a blast with these 2

toxic-inferno23d ago

For world design and interconnectedness (that's a word, right?) DS1 is yet to be beaten.

290°

9 Years Later, Does Bloodborne Deserve All The Praise It Gets?

Saad from eXputer: "Almost a decade later, it's time to take the nostalgia goggles off and accept that Bloodborne has long been surpassed by its successors."

jznrpg25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

Yes, yes it does. It’s still a great game. Elden Ring isn’t better just different and a bit easier . I like that you have to be aggressive but smart in Bloodborne

thorstein25d ago

I literally replayed it recently and it's better than I remember. I think it's like going back to a beloved book and noticing things I hadn't before.

raWfodog25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

Yo! I was getting ready to reply with the exact same four words you started with lol. Yes, I think Bloodborne has withstood the test of time and remains a great game. That’s why all the fans are hoping for a sequel someday. Hoping that we can catch that magic again with a new storyline.

Leeroyw25d ago

Yes. Just replayed it a few days ago. My first Platinum. And yes. I rage quitted so many times and called it BS too when I started. It's tight. The combat is amazing and the lore is rich.

GamingSinceForever25d ago

Elden Ring was easier? I don’t know about that at all. I remember leveling up in Bloodborne and breezing through it. In Elden Ring no matter how powerful I got I was still catching a beat down from every boss.

thorstein24d ago

That's due to scaling enemies. I remember not doing Haligtree untill near the end and having enemies withstand almost a full blast from Azur's Glintstone Staff Comet Azure. My level was quite high.

Melee characters are not fun in that game, especially for the Elden Beast.

MeteorPanda25d ago

Considering l did a run 2 months ago? Yes.

Show all comments (54)
160°

Bloodborne's Potential Remaster Continues To Be Sony's Biggest Missed Opportunity

"Sony is missing out on a hugely profitable opportunity by ignoring fan demands for a Bloodborne remaster and PC port," says Ahmed from eXputer.

thorstein53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

Bloodborne came out on the PS4. It is owned by From Software. What missed opportunity? I am sure the people at From Software know what they are doing. Especially since they are hiring devs instead of laying them off.

Maybe do an article about that instead of writing a hit piece on them acting like they don't know how to run their business.

53d ago
-Foxtrot53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

To be fair Hidetaka Miyazaki said in an interview

“Unfortunately, and I’ve said this in other interviews, it’s not in my place to talk about Bloodborne specifically. We simply don’t own the IP at FromSoftware.”

So the ball kind of is in Sonys court, it feels like a missed opportunity because it’s something people really want and Sony just hasn’t really been bothered to get it off the ground. There was rumours it was at one point but it all went silent.

Cacabunga52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Sony has been missing nothing but opportunities for a few years now.. since GOW release, it’s worrying silence we’ve been getting..

As for Bloodborne, imo it would be too soon to release it because PS4 game still looks phenomenal..

Bloodborne REMAKE I think will be PS6 launch title by Bluepoint. I truly hope so! 2 gens later we can get the same wow effect as Demons Souls.

Eonjay52d ago

He is right because it is Sonys IP but a little further back he also explained that they only work on one game at a time. This means that From must also be available. In other words it could already be in the pipeline. Ecen if that is the case, it's still up to Sony to reveal it when they are ready. As ever, I prefer not to hear about it until it's about 3 to 6 months from releasing.

CrashMania53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

'Bloodborne came out on the PS4. It is owned by From Software'

Actually Sony owns the IP, same with Demon's Souls. I think they'd prefer if From did the work on any future of both of those though, but if Sony wanted to they could have those off to anyone else to work on them, like the DS remake.

thorstein53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

Yeah. Thanks for the info.

But I still think that remasters should wait a generation. And Blue Point did Demon's Souls which was superb.

It can be a huge risk. And I think Hidetaka Miyazaki hinted that it would be a PS6 title. I don't he has no say in what happens, it's a partnership.

--Onilink--52d ago

To be honest, if there is a remake/remaster (not that it needs one) I would prefer someone else to handle it, like they did with Demon Souls

From many perspectives From Soft is an amazing developer, BUT, on a technical level they are far from impressive, both in terms of dated visuals (again, on a technical level, not art/design) and usually poor performance.

And what is the point of a remake/remaster if not to provide a visual and performance enhancement to a game that already nailed the rest?

Michiel198952d ago

@thorstein what huge risk? Part of one of the most well known ip's in gaming nowadays, there's not much risk there when it comes to a remake.

thorstein51d ago

@Michiel

I meant remasters in general are a huge risk, not Bloodborne.

Bloodborne isn't, but I think it's going to be on PS6, like how Demon's Souls went from PS3 to PS5.

Sorry for the confusion.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 51d ago
thesoftware73052d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Thorstein,

Wow, your post seems angry..relax it's an opinion.

And btw, it is on Sony, they have the exclusive right to the game, on top of that, they could have easily, at bare minimum, offered an official 60fps patch, with a few extras and charged people $10 to upgrade or $30-40 for new buyers.

I believe I saw an interview where , FromSoft said it was all up to Sony on a sequel and other dealing with the game.

A "hit peice", that serious huh?..relax lol.

thorstein52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Wow you seem angry. I responded to crash 2 days ago about the remaster and who did it.

Why do you care what other people think in a moment about some journalism. Calm down, buddy, it's just my opinion. From 3 days ago.

Edit: I just went back through my comments and found 2 where I call out the author in the past month. Wow, I'm a rageaholic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 51d ago
potatoseal53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

It will be a launch title on PS6 just like the remake of Demon's Souls for PS5 launch

OhReginald52d ago

Sony realizes people will flock to buy ps6s for a bloodborne remake. Easy money.

jznrpg52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Rumored it’s slated for PS6 launch. Some say PS5 Pro. Who knows ?

P_Bomb52d ago

Highly requested, unfortunately neglected.

jznrpg25d ago

Some say we didn’t need TLOU2 remake but that was a PS4 game and now we need a BB remake but that was a PS4 game. We send mixed signals

Show all comments (23)