520°

A New Cartridge-Based Console Is Being Made To “Reestablish The Culture Of Video Gaming”

Siliconera:
Remember cartridges? They were chunky bits of plastic and electronics that games used to be distributed on – the last one was the N64, released back in 1996. The good thing about a cartridge is that when you own one the creator of that game can’t suddenly take it away from you. This is one of advantages of the cartridge when compared to digital distribution that has led to the development of the Retro VGS (Retro Video Games System), which is an upcoming cartridge-based games console.

Read Full Story >>
siliconera.com
DarkBlood3249d ago

Man I want me one of that lol

MrSwankSinatra3249d ago (Edited 3249d ago )

I would want to if they weren't re-purposing Atari Jaguars. Say what you will about the Atari Jaguar, but I'm strongly against using existing hardware and transforming them into something completely different. The whole vision of this thing is a contradiction, how are we supposed to preserve retro gaming when they're actively destroying things like old cartridges and in this case jaguars? Hell this same type of thing is happening with Yooka Laylee where they have this N64 bit version, but the thing is that it does nothing it's just a N64 cartridge flash drive. They're re-purposing existing carts to make into freaking flash drives!

lashes2ashes3249d ago

The Jaguars outer housing has been used for dental x-Ray cameras for years now. At least this way the money from there sale stays in the game industry. There is insane amounts of game related shells and cartridges all over the place and the majority of people, gamers included think of it as junk from a bygone era. So would you prefer they end up in a landfill?

MrSwankSinatra3249d ago (Edited 3249d ago )

@lashes2ashes Actually Atari sold their remaining stock of jaguar outer shells to the dental industry after they discontinued the jaguar. Dental companies didn't just take take functioning jaguars and gut them to make dental x-rays.

Aenea3249d ago

Actually, I've read they got their hands on the mold (or somesuch) with which they can cheaply make the shells themselves. Apparently a lot cheaper than if they had to design their own shell and then have the mold made that allows them to make more.

They are doing all kinds of different colours as well so these aren't the old shells of the Jaguar made back then by Atari but just new shells that look exactly the same!

evs4903249d ago (Edited 3249d ago )

Where does lashes2ashes say they gut jaguars to use their shells?

OCEANGROWNKUSH3249d ago (Edited 3249d ago )

They actually acquired the original molds, they arent "gutting jaguars" to make these. In fact they offered for sale a clear jaguar case mold, before they altered the mold.

Visiblemarc3249d ago

Yeah, I'm a bit confused. The purpose here is to use unwanted older hardware.

The vast majority of existing retro hardware will be buried in garbage dumps.

This is a better use.

NukaCola3249d ago

My local store 2nd & Charles sells 5 different models of a system called RetroN (1 -5) that play different cartridges plus some handheld devices that can play NES games. Also has new retro controllers usb and oldschool hookups. I can't wait for a version that can play N64 games. RetroN 5plays NES, SNES, Genesis, and a bunch more for 150 bucks.

lameguy3249d ago (Edited 3249d ago )

When will the age of "remasters" end!? Oh the humanity!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3249d ago
player9113249d ago

The already have those consoles that accept n64, snes, genesis, nes, etc. Although I personally dislike physical copies these days. I would rather have a system that accepts a medium, backs it up, and plays locally. The Ouya actually is the best retro gamer box I have found to date. Supports 4 PS controllers natively and works fantastic.

XanderZane3249d ago

I'd get it if each cartridge had 50+ games on them. There's no need to buy this and then be spending $5-$10 a pop for each cartridge with just one game on it. Those days are over for me. If they can't get me 25-50 games on one cartridge for $15 - $25 I wouldn't even waste my time with this.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3249d ago
Relientk773249d ago

Well I'm definitely intrigued

KryptoniteTail3249d ago

It needs online play, otherwise it is trash. Online isn't a PS4 thing, it goes back to Saturn (and further back outside the U.S). Sorry but certain genres suck without online (especially Fighting games, npt everyone has access to a thriving offline community) and we can never experience something like an 8-bit "Journey," not without the Internet.

The core idea is absolutely genius, simple but genius. It just needs to embrace basic features which old consoles tdied/wanted but didn't or couldn't perfect. There's a difference between old school and stupid.

rainslacker3249d ago

Many retro cartridge games wouldn't be enhanced with the inclusion of online features. It used to be nice to just throw in a cart, and it'd be a complete finished game with no DLC or MT.

3248d ago
Tetsujin3248d ago

@Masenko

"I can't stand you casuals, obviously you don't want real and varied competition."

I'm an active tournament player through EVO (under my real name which I will not reveal) and your comment is the reason the ones who play online more than offline are knocked out faster, or "might" barely make it past the first pool. The reason players prefer to play offline is more than just "nostalgia" like you want to argue however your entire post is proof you don't know how tournament players really are. I should dissect your entire post to show how ignorant you really are, however you're not worth the time or effort, and borderline trolling at this point.

Before you go on defense mode the argument here is the fact that people need to remember there was a time where gaming didn't have online, dlc, or patches (expansions were to add to the game, not cut and re added later like it is today). Rarely did a game release so broken they had a recall, however now it's easy to release a game and patch it later. Too many people today rely so much on the online aspect they forgot there's this idea called offline mode, and this other thing called local friends. There's a reason why official, sanctioned tournaments have them offline and in person.

OT
I wonder what games would be available for this console, because it would be nice to revisit memory lane again for some of the games that are difficult to obtain under normal channels. I also like how there's USB ports on the console so you can use various controllers based on preference.

rainslacker3248d ago

I understand, but there are still a lot of games that wouldn't have necessarily been improved by online play. For games that had MP features, I can understand where you're coming from, but I will say that I do miss the amount of couch MP/co-op that there used to be as many games seem to have thought that no one hangs out with friends anymore.

And yes, I was quite happy "button mashing" with my cousins or friends or whoever happened to be around. I actually like socializing with people I know and having fun while doing it.

Those awesome moments meant a lot more when you can share them in person with someone in the room, like that first time when a group of people see a fatality in MK, or one person makes a comeback with barely any health left on their bar. It was so much more satisfying giving the other person a hard time about it when you could see their reaction in person, in real time, and not through a speaker on a headset or a small video chat window.

It's fine if you want to play the best players around the world, but come down off your high horse. I'd imagine the reason you may not enjoy "button mashing" with your friends is because you just have a terrible attitude towards them.

keegamer803249d ago

I remember Sega Genesis having online in the mid nineties. I think it was called the sega channel.

mydyingparadiselost3249d ago

Yea, the Sega Channel was a cool concept and was great... until you lost the Shining Force save that was at the end of the game because loading a save using Sega Channel was literally ALWAYS a crap shoot.
Ah, great memories :/

Tetsujin3248d ago

Also Xband for Genesis and SNES, required dial up. Even before then there was some test hardware for tha Atari systems however at the time the technology was limited so it never took off.

Retroman3249d ago (Edited 3249d ago )

@ kryptonite

Why do every bloody game need to be online and if not it's rubbish . you must be new skool, old school gamers dont care about online crap F.U.N is the game . a cartridge console is great dont mine playing Final fight, Battletoad, Contra, Einhander, Gunstar super hero, Gradius, R-type , Battle arena toshiden, Metal slug, Raiden 6 etc.... again .

im sure some tired of open world games as i am
like to go back to offline 2 player fun games . no cursing ,no microtrans action, no digital down loads, no buggy half done 59.00 game that need patches

Psychotica3249d ago

Just the opposite it true. It's when online was added that gaming got worse..

Skizelli3249d ago (Edited 3249d ago )

I personally feel that online capabilities hurt console gaming more than it helped. Not only did it take away the social interaction, but developers use it as a pass to release broken games knowing they can just fix it later.

Don't get me wrong, I've been gaming online via consoles since Dreamcast and I've had my fair share of good times with it, but it pales in comparison to the days when all of your friends/siblings were in the same room together playing GoldenEye or Halo (hell, even Super Mario Bros.). I miss that. I knew that was all about to change the day I played Halo 2 online with my friends for the first time.

I'm sure there's a lot of people who feel the same way I do. I'm willing to bet it's part of the reason live streaming is so popular right now. People miss that connection with others while playing (or watching) games. When you're anonymous, I might as well be playing the computer.

I'll tell you what I don't miss: Split screens. If anything, this console should support LAN.

rainslacker3248d ago (Edited 3248d ago )

I think it substituted one social interaction with another. Online play wasn't a terrible idea, and I actually think it's good, but when MP started being removed from games for favor of online things just started to be less fun. I prefer couch MP/co-op myself, because I actually know the people I'm playing with, and it's just more fun than playing with random people or even playing with friends online.

It seems couch co-op/MP is making a come-back in some genres, and it never left fighting games, but there are so many online MP games which don't get played among friends sitting in the same room because there is no option for more than one person to play at a time, and passing around the controller is only fun for the time you have the controller.

Pillsbury13249d ago

Then you sir are not the target market, please keep walking thank you.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3248d ago
FallenAngel19843249d ago

The PS TV was the last home console to use cartridges

MASTER_RAIDEN3249d ago

The only thing psv tv plays in cartridge form are games designed for a handheld. There are no games designed for the psv TV specifically. It's a non mobile platform for handheld games. Not a cartridge based home game console.

WeAreLegion3249d ago

"There will be no system updates, digital downloads or buggy games."

So, the bugs that DO come with the game will just stay there? Good. I was hoping that feature would return.

WilliamUsher3249d ago

It was a lot less common than it is nowadays.

I can't think of ONE major AAA release that didn't require a day one patch.

Old games had bugs but it was rare that they launched with game-breaking bugs, opposite of today's games... like Assassin's Creed Unity, or Project CARS, or The Witcher 3, or Dark Void, or RIDE or any other number of games recently released that required more patches than a leaky old dam.

Spotie3249d ago

It was less common largely because there were less games, not because the frequency was any lower.

WilliamUsher3249d ago

@Spotie,

"Less games" is relatively and fairly incorrect if you were including all the different game systems out then. The SNES, Sega, NES, 3DO, Turbo Grafix 16, Jaguar PSX, N64 -- throughout the 90s there were only a few games I ever remember not working right at launch. There was a nasty save game bug in WWF No Mercy for the N64 that would erase your save game or the whole game would freeze, but there was a recall on that and THQ/Nintendo got it sorted shortly after launch.

Beyond that you're incorrect, frequency was lower since there was no such thing as patching console games back then. Look up Nintendo's seal of quality and why it was implemented following the crash back in the mid 1980s.

You would need to back up your claim with some sort of hard data that frequency was relative to the amount of games released for home consoles.

wannabe gamer3249d ago

it may have something to do with older games being i dont know....a zillion times less complex than modern day games. lets debug a game thats hundreds of Kilobytes or a few megabytes vs modern games that are up to 50GB+. ya know i dont even wanna hear a reply cause its gonna be some keyboard cowboy gamer that things making a game is so easy just go fix it already blehbleh

Show all comments (101)
40°

The Sordid History of the Coleco Chameleon / Retro VGS

Marcus Estrada writes: "Cliqist takes a look at the sordid history of the Coleco Chameleon, otherwise known as the Retro VGS video game console from Mike Kennedy."

garyanderson2961d ago

Even if this thing was never a scam, it's amazing that people got excited for it at all. It was pointless from day one.

140°

Why Did the Retro VGS Fail to Attract More Gamers?

Marcus Estrada writes: "As you may have heard, the Retro VGS crowdfunding campaign has been canceled due to totally stalling out at just under 150 backers. Those backers were apparently immensely into the project as they managed to raise over $40,000 with such a small group. The question that some are now asking is why didn’t this project make it? Why was a certified retro enthusiast console unable to attain a goal of $1,950,000 when something like the Ouya managed $8+ million with just a fuzzy idea?"

Neonridr3112d ago (Edited 3112d ago )

I think it was a misunderstanding as to what this unit was and what it could actually do. Had it been a console that played retro games via multiple cart ports along with the ability to play newly programed game carts I believe it would have done a lot better.

thorstein3112d ago

And yet, those already exist. So, I am not sure what I would be getting here since I have all my old console games and can just plug them into one my Super Retro Trio.

Many similar devices are found in used games stores.

Neonridr3108d ago

oh I don't disagree, I totally understand the Retron line also exists which does the same things.

I think people were expecting something else to begin with and the final product was nothing like the vision.

AndrewLB3112d ago

If I want to play retro games, I fire up an emulator.

gangsta_red3112d ago

Maybe it's because of the Ouya failing that many were hesitant to also back another crowd funded console.

derkasan3112d ago

I think that's part of it. The other could be because it didn't make as many lofty promises. I remember people saying the Ouya had "infinite processing power" and could run Skyrim and BF3 on Ultra.

GrimDragon3112d ago

How is this failing not evident from the start? Your talking about a cartridge based console something that hasn't seen the light of day in yrs and for a good reason it's expensive to produce silicone chips. Anyone who's followed gaming since the days of Atari know this. it was the biggest problem of its day. How do you bring back something like that against the convenience of digital content and blue ray disk? You made a retro game system that wanted to go way too retro. Iam sure backers had to have asked who's going to manufacture all these cartridges what stores will risk shelf space for all these thousands of indie games who's going to run quality control etc etc. it was stupid from the start. Not to mention a retro system far to focused on indie games where the vast majority of those games suck one mine craft in a hundred. And you can't rely on classic retro games from new geo, sega and capcom when they already have other more viable outlets for their games. Ouja made more money more quickly because it was vastly more versatile and was really promising in concept but alas the execution was a complete failure. Hopefully lesson learned by all involved.

gangsta_red3112d ago

I agree, not to mention the fact that more than likely most of the games for this system would have been available on much more popular platforms like WiiU, PS4, X1 and Steam. Making buying the actual cartridge not only pointless but pretty much for a small select group of nostalgic gamers.

I personally would have loved to of seen this take off just to see another avenue for independent developers to sell their games on.

NeckBeardBSMTDweller3112d ago

@GrimDragon wait a minute, so what your saying is that this was really just an electronic Ouija Board, that played recycled ET atari cartridges, and it died because of a failed execution? (Electric Chair)

GrimDragon3112d ago

Lol@neckbeard that sounds about right

3112d ago
Show all comments (25)
40°

Retro VGS Console Indiegogo Being Canceled, Devs To Regroup

Serena Nelson writes: "It was bound to happen. The Indiegogo campaign for the new console Retro VGS is being canceled."