540°

PlayStation TV sales up 1,272% on Amazon since price cut

PlayStation TV sales appear to have skyrocketed following the device's price cut earlier this week.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
nix3315d ago

that means it's actually up by 636%...

nix3315d ago

i meant money that Sony would be making.. they've cut the price so lesser the profit.

the_dark_one3315d ago

ok, but they are not talking about the profit here they talking about PSTV sales going up by 1272%

user55757083314d ago

would be nice if they specified europe. still too expensive in north america

theFAYEsorceress3315d ago

that is NOT how math works lolz even if they said "profit" was up "x" amount of percent, you'd still be wrong... "sales" has ALWAYS referred to the number of units sold.

Unspoken3315d ago

But the ratings remained the same.

Cut price nearly in half and now it is closer to what its actually worth.

Just check back in a few weeks and we'll see the percentage drop down just as dramatically after everyone who was on the fence aquires one.

NecotheSergal3314d ago

Not even one incidental agree on this post XD

But yeah, what the_dark_one said. You must be new here. Or really young.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3314d ago
Summons753315d ago

Well what do you expect when something was over priced and they finally stopped expecting people to buy that? I might even get one now.

UKmilitia3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

they just need to see more sense and lower price of vita cards.

lower price nad i will be buying a vita and one of these tv things.

Rodney253314d ago

Lol I love How you called it "one of these TV things" makes you sound like a grandpa getting mad at technology.

Kane223315d ago

it was not overpriced. i just think people didn't really have a reason to buy one or sony didn't do enough to convince people. lowering the price of anything is gonna get people to buy it more. this is nothing new.

donwel3315d ago

And a severe lack of advertising, though that's been par for the course with Sony and the Vita.
I remember sales of the Vita picking up around christmas time when it had a bit of a presence on UK television but they just seem to have forgotten about it again now. It's some of the most unusual handling of a gaming device I've ever seen.

miyamoto3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

If you are a fan of the LEGO games Lego Ninjago: Shadow of Ronin PS Vita/PS TV version is really the console experience on the go.
So much fun!

XanderZane3315d ago

Now if they can fix the PSNow pricing we'll all be happy. PSTV is a waste of money. I'm very happy playing my PS Vita games on the regular screen. I haven't seen any advertising for the PSTV. I still won't get one.

Kleptic3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

I don't even know what the PSTV is? Is it still a Eu/Uk only thing?

I bought a Sony TV late last year for a great price, and it has PSNow as well as some remote play features built in (didn't look into exactly what it was, launching the app just starts bugging you to connect a Vita)...also has bluetooth connectivity that allows a DS3 to be paired and connected (for the PSNow stuff)...weirdly though, the manual specifically says this model TV will only work with a DS3, not a DS4...

so...is that all the PSTV did outside of typical video streaming? I can understand why no one has ever heard of it, especially considering it seems a lot of newer Sony televisions have it...kind of built in...

FamilyGuy3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

@kleptic

The PS TV is a PS Vita console, it plays vita games on your tv (and does many of the things a vita can do) rather than being portable.

rainslacker3315d ago

What would be an appropriate price to you? Not saying you're wrong, but the price has been pretty reasonable for a while now...particularly for the one with the controller, game, and mem card.

Think there was just a lack of demand due to terrible marketing, and possibly Sony not caring that much. I imagine they aren't losing money on these things though, or else they'd drop the line entirely.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3314d ago
mushroomwig3315d ago

Not surprisingly, I also have it on my Amazon wish list now. Just waiting until pay day!

SniperControl3315d ago

I actually bought one on Thursday(day before price drop) then found out on Friday that Sony were dropping it to half price, went back to Argos for a refund of the difference and they would not do it.

It was only when i kicked up a fuss and started to quote European consumer law and getting trading standards involved did they relent.

One for customer power...

sonerone3315d ago

U should've just bring it back, ask for refund sayin it's not working or something and than buy a new one on half price. U could save some stress for yourself

SniperControl3315d ago

@sonerone

I shouldn't have to though, i only bought it the day before(18 hours in fact), I bought a large screen TV last year and it went down in price by £150 one week later, John Lewis had no problems whatsoever in refunding the difference back to me there and then.

I just think i got a jobsworth who didnt want to refund the difference.

Not many people know that EU consumer law gives the customer alot of power, 90% of customers in my position would have walked out there with nothing and there tails between there legs.

Yehshuah3315d ago

you damn average consumer. all you do is work and buy. no wonder the world is like what it is.

DarkZane3315d ago

If that price cut come to north america (I don't doubt that it will) I am definitely buying it. Freedom Wars, Tales of Hearts R and Sword Art Online are just 3 of the games I wanna play on TV.

dolphin_supreme3315d ago

I know you can stream vita to ps tv, but ca you use a ds4 to pkay your vita games? If so, then I'm definitely getting it! Love my vita but the controls are too close for my hands. I also don't like those hand grips.

uth113315d ago

The PS TV can use a DS4 or Ds3

Becuzisaid3315d ago

I'm almost certain that you can, though do your own research on it to be sure.

morganfell3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

You can use a DS4. I purchased one specifically for that purpose. Just plug it in to the PS TV and hit the PS button on the controller to assign it and then you can go wireless. After that you only need to pkug it in if you want to use the PS TV to charge it. Personally, I use a separate stand alone charger but the point is it functions like a normal controller on a console.

Rockstar3315d ago

You absolutely can. I'm using my camo DS4 on it right now.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3315d ago
rainslacker3315d ago

It's only $89.99 right now on amazon for the bundle. Regular one is $68. Think that's a pretty good price to take the plunge, because all those games are great(can't speak for SAO though).

I'd recommend Ys also, but not sure if it's compatible as of yet.

Morpheuzpr3315d ago

I could never got over how stupid people are. They were always saying that the Vita was too expensive yet they were paying $500-$600 for a phone that at the time the vita released were less powerful and had lower tech.

I personally believe they are the reason the Vita is at the state it is. They always preferred to play crappy mobile games vs games like Uncharted, Gravity Rush, Ys, Tokiden, Freedom Wars, Killzone, Little Big Planet, Rayman, Soul Sacrifice and so many more. It's ridiculous IMO.

SaiyanFury3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

I love how you got a disagree, and no doubt I will as well, but what you said is absolutely true. People will dish out 4-500 dollars for a phone every 2 or so years, yet complain about the price of the Vita. God above, the entitlement mentality annoys me to no end. People just can't stand to hear the truth. Bubble from me for conveying simple common sense.

Haki11123315d ago

Compare a mobile phone to a mobile gaming device is the truth? You sir just went full potato

OldDude3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

I love how stupid your argument is. Comparing a phone to a Vita. Last I checked I couldn't make a phone call on my Vita.

Hey I have an idea, lets compare it to my Harley, it makes just about as much sense.

Morpheuzpr3315d ago

So to you the ability to make phone calls is worth the extra $200-$300? And FYI the vita has Skype so yes you can make phone calls with it.

pwnsause_returns3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

You can make phone calls with it with Skype.....the 3G version didnt sound so bad after all, considering that you are paying for mobile data, and in top of that, a cheap Skype plan.

Then again by the time the 3G version came out, lte service was beginning to take over.

G20WLY3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

Oops. Morpheuzpr just made OldDude look real silly.

The point Morpheuzpr was making was that some people drop 400-500 or more every year or so on REPLACEMENT phone - i.e. they already had a phone for calls - and yet these gamers complained that the Vita was too expensive.

Incidentally, as much as I love my Vita, the memory cards ARE too expensive and I think that's held back people from buying one. I hope Sony address that issue next.

This price for PS TV is a no brainer. Play PS4 games from a hotel room on a work trip? Yes frickin' please! :)

blastcorp643315d ago

Sony should do what phone service providers do by offering subsidized vitas for a 2 year commitment to PS plus or something along those lines. I would guess most people don't pay $600 for a phone but through some sort of subsidized program or payment plan. Besides, phones are inherently more in demand due to necessity. I'm sure only a very small minority buy phones for gaming.

maniacmayhem3315d ago

Smartphones and that particular market is in a whole different class than the dedicated portable handheld crowd.

Phones appeal to a wider audience, has A LOT more uses and is a necessity to most people of the world. The Vita is not, it caters to the niche hardcore gamer demographic which are not willing to spend 500-600 on a gaming system, they sure as heck wont spend anywhere near that for a portable gaming handheld.

Ravenor3315d ago

I'm always a little aghast at the logic some people employ here.

"So to you the ability to make phone calls is worth the extra $200-$300?" Like what kind of Sony juice have you been sucking down?

I'm all for dedicated gaming platforms, but comparing them to Smartphones is Grade A stupid. My phone is basically a little computer, my Vita is not. It's a game machine that does game machine things.

ALSO, STOP, STOP, STOP making value judgments for other people. You think the Vita is a good value, others would rather buy a phone then a dedicated game machine, some people (me) just don't like using them. There isn't a one size fits all in this situation and sometimes, SOMETIMES people value the functions a phone does infinitely better than a Vita (Apps, Web Browsing) far more than games on the go.

KwietStorm_BLM3315d ago

I don't know how that comparison fits at all, basically saying all those people who pay unlocked prices for phones (like me), are buying ybrm with the intention of using it as a gaming device. I sure as hell don't care much for games on phones, and I personally haven't seen people complain about the price of the Vita. I do always see complaints about the games available, that being that there aren't enough, or that the system isn't taken advantage of. All those people you say who prefer "crappy mobile games" were never in the market for the Vita in the first place. To somehow come to the conclusion that they are the reason the Vita is in the state that it is, it just sounds like you're coming to the defense for something you have no obligation to defend.

rainslacker3315d ago

I think it's problems lie more in the perception that it doesn't have any games. The system was never really overpriced for what it is. The 3DS was only like $20 cheaper upon the Vita's release and it is nowhere near as capable. Memory cards made the Vita less appealing as they were required. The constant barrage of misinformation about the system hasn't helped it sell well. Other than that, Sony gave up marketing the system way too soon, and instead of trying to be clever with the name, they should have just called it the PSP2, so people would recognize it for what it is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3315d ago
Show all comments (81)
140°

PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher

With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?

thorstein4d ago

No, and they already solved any need with the overlay that's coming.

Vits4d ago

Unless they are trying to kill their recently created PC business, I would advise against opening a dedicated PC store. It's an extremely hard endeavor, and people, in general, are very comfortable with Steam. Even Epic, with their billions of dollars invested, is still struggling to find a foothold, and they have Fortnite.

just_looken3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Money is one thing security is another but again millions have 0 knowledge past 2020.

Epic store for years struggled with a shopping cart/account theft/credit card theft

Rockstar launcher/store to this day over 5 years later still has horrific user interface security flaws lost account's and stolen CC

Then you got that activision need phone number oh we lost it launcher

The crown jewel is the ea launcher/store ea app 3 yrs old still has hundreds of threads were people lost games/accounts/game access or just straight up crashes.

Edit" Oh ubi launcher were you buy a game that may or may not be there again or work and the launcher 5yrs old still has no 4K support if you launch it on a 4k screen there is a high chance it will just crash.

ocelot074d ago

Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming.

It's just a known fact. The PC gaming community prefer Steam and Steam alone. They don't like different launchers. I personally don't mind them. But majority just stick with steam. Hence why EA and Ubisoft went back to on releasing on steam and why Microsoft release games on steam as people hated buying from the windows store.

The only other launchers that I imagine are doing ok is GOG due to being drm free and epic games due to the free games every week. Sony shouldn't release any sort of pc launcher n

Nitrowolf24d ago (Edited 4d ago )

It literally says in the OP that PC gamers don't like multiple launchers lol. It even mentions Steam being the go to for gamers

Tacoboto4d ago

Title: "PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher"

N4G: "Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming"

When you don't even read the headline...

ocelot073d ago

I read it and had a brain fart. As read the title then this "With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?"

So I hold my hands up on that mistake. Rest of my comment still stands.

Giblet_Head3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Steam and GOG are highly preferred because of the rich feature set. Ubisoft, Rockstar, EA, Epic etc have all set a precedent over the years for customers to instinctively expect individual publisher launchers to be so extremely half-assed that the majority simply don't want to bother dealing with what is almost an inevitable disappointment by comparison to Steam or GOG. Those publishers and their inaction or general disinterest to improve have effectively ruined any future adoption to be taken seriously.

Einhander19724d ago (Edited 4d ago )

This is just another ridiculous double standard article.

It's like how Microsoft can spend 20 years of making nothing but gaas and live service style games to sell microtransactions, dlc and subscriptions and get praise for doing it, but if Sony wants to make a single game like that every website under the sun is writing articles saying how Sony is anti-consumer or whatever.

derek3d ago

Yep, huge double standard look at the tortured reaction to the ps5pro, websites hyperventilating like Sony is forcing people to buy it.

just_looken3d ago

Wait my xbox from 2004 has avengers gaas on it? wow your so smart

m$ Gaas started with the other companies like sony

Gamepass yes they are deep into that but its still a huge money saver sense you do not own your games then get a service like that.

Now there pc xbox launcher that is trash for years now

Show all comments (15)
240°

Is Driver (PS1) Still Worth Playing in 2024?

"Driver was a technical achievement for PS1, a pioneer in cinematic gaming, and an often brutal challenge - TechStomper asks if its brand of 70s car chase antics still holds up."

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
PrimeVinister12d ago

The driving holds up, most of everything else does not.

PrimeVinister12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@Shane Kim

Well, I mean the driving physics hold up. The draw distance, police AI, visuals in general etc do not

Cacabunga11d ago

One of my all time favorites on PS1. I spent a summer vacation playing this was so good

isarai12d ago

Sadly youd be hard pressed to find any driving game with better physics these days. But the draw distance really kills it for me

PrimeVinister12d ago

The physics hold up ridiculously well. And the draw distance is a real hurdle at first.

__y2jb12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Nonsense. The physics in any modern game or any 360 game is light years beyond Driver.

Dandizzle12d ago

This game is hard, you will fail and quit

PrimeVinister12d ago

But you will get there eventually... maybe

MatrixxGT12d ago

All in the first two minutes.

jznrpg12d ago

Stop with is it worth it articles. If you want to play a game play the damn game!

anast11d ago

I loved this game awhile back.

Barlos11d ago

Yeah but is it worth reading pointless articles?

__y2jb12d ago

It wasn’t worth playing in the 90’s.

Espangerish12d ago

My thoughts exactly. I bought it at release for full price and got frustrated and bored with it very quickly.

Show all comments (41)
240°

Is Gran Turismo (PS1) Still Worth Playing in 2024?

Gran Turismo for PlayStation launched a sub-genre and revolutionised console racing - TechStomper asks is it still worth playing in 2024.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
Terry_B14d ago

Well..you can play it completely offline at least ^^

PrimeVinister14d ago

Something we really miss, just turning on the console and having the game start without signing into stuff

Terry_B14d ago

Fully agreed. That and Splitscreen Modes for Racing games.

PrimeVinister14d ago

@Terry_B I miss having people to splitscreen with, but I can't blame anyone for that :-(

Cacabunga14d ago

Not too late.. we can still change that.

PrimeVinister13d ago

@Cacabunga I will let you in, see ya soon compadre :-P

MrBaskerville13d ago

@Terry_B
GT7 actually has 4 player splitscreen. Which is wild in this day and age.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
TiredGamer13d ago

Good news is that Sony released a final update to Gran Turismo Sport to allow it to function offline. Expecting the same for GT7 at some point in the future.

PrimeVinister13d ago

That is great news, I really liked Sport even if many others did not :-/

Chocoburger14d ago

I'm not big into sim racing, but I got sucked into the hype for this one from magazines back then. I just played arcade mode and that was enough for me to feel like I got my money's worth.

Yeah, it's definitely worth playing today. GT 2 has a few interesting fan made graphical mods when played on an emulator as well.

PrimeVinister14d ago

The arcade mode is underrated, it's a great alternative mode and you can even unlock GT HiFi with it.

Fonsecap14d ago

Cars back then had much more personality then those we see today. Modern cars all about the led lights and the tablet size screens and they all seem alike, back then they could be simpler in design but had tons more personality.

PrimeVinister13d ago

That is something a few people have pointed out - that cars all look the same now. I have to agree that a lot of new vehicles lack personality.

fsfsxii13d ago

You guys are so anti-fun its depressing, like who tf cares about personality of objects like wtf? Just learn to enjoy stuff as is.

PrimeVinister13d ago

It's hardly anti-fun to remark that some objects look nicer than others.

And everyone has their favourite era of cars, I sincerely doubt many will pick the 2020s a few decades from now.

Fonsecap13d ago

Dude, like wft cares about personality of objects? What about art? Paintings are objects and they're considered good or bad if they show or lack personality so I ask, wtf are you talking about? Cars are also considered pieces of art, vintage cars, classic cars, classic bikes and so on. Artists are appreciated by the objects they craft, blacksmiths, painters, engineers, designers, so wtf cares about personality of objects indeed... ( Sorry for my English, it's not my native language)

MrBaskerville13d ago

Talking about cars is fun if you are a car enthusiast. Just saying.

ApocalypseShadow13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

That Corvette Stingray to this day is one of the most ferocious whips ever driven. Overpowered against other cars yes. But to drive it and be that close to losing control, but being in command around those curves, just can't be duplicated.

HiFi mode is also something I miss. There should be a mode in today's GT where it's Mano o Mano and the detail and resolution jump full throttle. In today's games, Max Ray Tracing and lighting and textures to make it look even more real..

PrimeVinister13d ago

A modern HiFi mode would be really cool! It would be really interesting to see how real they could go by stripping it all way back.

And Stingray is a solid choice 👌

TiredGamer13d ago

HiFi mode in GT1 was only a stripped down 60 fps mode for one track. Should have been called "Performance Mode" or "High Frame Rate" mode.

PrimeVinister13d ago

@TiredGamer it was only three tracks, but it was still cool

Petebloodyonion13d ago

Not according to Former Playstation president Jim Ryan for he told Time that he doesn't see why anyone would play old games given the advancements in fidelity achieved today.

https://time.com/4804768/pl...

PrimeVinister13d ago

I don't agree with him, but he had a few good points.

Show all comments (33)