330°

God of War III Remastered is Undeniably Unnecessary

God of War III Remastered was just announced today, and while that on paper would seem like cause for excitement, it's cause for disappointment.

Read Full Story >>
hardcoregamer.com
Abash3318d ago

A lot of people missed out on the game because they didn't have a PS3 last gen, so how is it unnecessary when they intend to continue the series with a PS4 installment?

Cindy-rella3318d ago

Making this article is undeniably unnecessary.

breakpad3318d ago (Edited 3318d ago )

i agree that GoW is unnecessary ..i didnt like any GoW of the series and i would prefer a new game IP ... Sony started to milking the cow before even born..no new (exclusive) IP no successs for PS4

sonarus3317d ago

I agree that a lot of people missed out on the game. But it just seems a little lazy by sony. If they had remastered all 3 for full price it would have been more sensible. It was cool with the last of us and GTA cus those games came out towards the end of PS3 life cycle and were more ground breaking. GOW3 wasnt even best game in the series. Just seems lazy

Jalva3318d ago (Edited 3318d ago )

"A lot of people missed out on the game because they didn't have a PS3 last gen"

And? If they cared about the game back then they would have bought a PS3 by now, for the love of god stop this 'remaster' craze before it gets out of control, or it will end up being this generation's DLC trend...

Ricegum3318d ago

I have a PS3 and I didn't play this game, and will certainly be picking up this definitive version. I guess I just never really had time for God Of War for whatever reason so I guess this is a good thing for me because I always meant to give it a go. Looking forward to it.

Genuine-User3318d ago (Edited 3318d ago )

Hyperbole detected.

I have seen many people carry interest in games that are not available on their platform of choice. It's possible to like something without having the finance to own it.
There are only a handful of remasters out of the 70+ retail games released on current-gen so far. And only one by SCE; The Last of Us.

The only thing getting out of control is your hyperbolic comments and constant trolling on God of War threads.

hangdang3318d ago

Do I need to point out that maybe they didn't "Care about the game back then?" If you don't want it, don't buy it and shut up. Just because you don't think it's necessary, it doesn't mean that there aren't people who don't. Vote with your wallet. Common sense stuff.

from the beach3318d ago

You still could play it on PS3, lol. RIGHT NOW!!

OB1Biker3318d ago

@Unreal01
Same for me I want to play on PS4 so much better.
BTW notice. The double standard approach about remastered for xbox

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3318d ago
nicksetzer13318d ago (Edited 3318d ago )

And for the people who missed 1 and 2 then what? They should just start on the 3rd game in the series? How is that different from just starting with the 4th game?.... not to mention a resolution bump is hardly worth $40, at least to me. I would say all 3 games would definitely be worth $40-60.

If the aim is toward those who never played the game, then they totally failed, as those people will still not know the story from 1 and 2.

tinynuggins3318d ago

I agree. I've never played a GOW game but they always looked fun. I would like to start with the first one though. Kind of a missed opportunity if this is geared towards those who are looking to experience the franchise for the first time.

gangsta_red3318d ago

I agree, why give the people one/third of the experience. Is it because they plan on putting the other two entries on PSNow?

They already have a HD collection for PS3, they should have taken the extra time to port those along with part 3 and sell a complete package.

Seems like such a wasted opportunity from Sony.

Crimzon3318d ago

I agree. The remastering is welcome and I'm glad they're doing it, but the price point is appalling. Asking $40 for a resolution bump to an old game is obnoxious, it should have been a $15-$20 PSN release.

LAWSON723318d ago

Nobody interested in GoW should just be playing GoW 3.

N311V3316d ago (Edited 3316d ago )

If you were only able to play one GoW game I'd argue that GoW III is the one to play. It's the pinnacle of the series and the previous two pale in comparison. Also GoW III does a decent job of filling in tha back story.

MysticStrummer3318d ago

Some people apparently can't handle the simple fact that a sizeable part of the market buys remasters.

pivotplease3317d ago

Only complaint is that including ascension would have been a cool move. Not the best of the series but it deserves to make the cut.It would have been like a collection of the HD games.

MysticStrummer3317d ago

I'd rather have a complete collection also. That's the only way I'd consider buying it, but a complete GoW collection on PS4 is no more or less "necessary" than a single game from that series. My comment was just referring to guys like Jalva up there.

Thatguy-3103318d ago

There's just no point to it dude. No one was asking for the Remastered edition to begin with. Sony should just focus on offering new experiences from here on out. I'm just thankful that they didn't use the big conference stages to announce this. Now when I hear remasters I just roll me eyes because everything is getting Remastered instead of introducing new IP's.

ZombieKiller3318d ago

I am a fan of this game and will buy it again. Not necessary but wanted. Yeah I want it, which is why I'll buy it. Just like you don't want it, you won't buy it....and write an article about it like anyone cares.

Genuine-User3318d ago (Edited 3318d ago )

The amount of stealth disagrees is proof of the hypocritical nature of fanboys on this website. I don't recall people having a problem with Microsoft's interest in bringing Alan Wake to the X1, or the already released Wind Waker HD on Wii U.
People also defended the broken pile of crap that Master chief collection-multiplayer up until it was barely fixed.

ZombieKiller3317d ago

Not to mention the PS4 amount of exclusives outweighing the X1's. Maybe unnecessary if there were no next gen games but there are plenty of them....especially on PS4. I have too many games to play this year and this is another one that just made the list. It's a shame it comes after Arkham Knight and not before so I can actually give it a glance (I'm kidding, GOW3 is one of my favorite games actually)
I for one, appreciate the remasters because I've noticed alot of "no name studios" or lesser names remaking them. That gives them time with the tools and great practice so maybe one day they can make a game of their own. Not to mention they can prove their worth so that maybe they can help with later project directly related to the sequels kind of like Activision did with SHG (I know, bad example ....Activision)

iTechHeads3318d ago

Some people fail to understand that.

There's a lot of Wii to PS4 upgrades this gen too so there is a market for PS3s greatest hits on PS4.

Don't worry though, all-new games are coming for PS4. They'll come when they're ready. Better to delay games like Uncharted 4 then release them broken.

DivoJones3317d ago

Well seems like they could've remastered the entire collection that released on PS3. But definitely won't do anything to stop the outcry against HD remasters on new consoles.

pivotplease3317d ago

People say it's unnecessary but it's actually fantastic to have games like this available down the line. In two or three years this and TLoU can be picked up for super cheap during a drought or when that craving hits and you won't want to be starting up your PS3 at this point. Both games are masterpieces in terms of what they set out to do. I'm actually happy because I plan on getting both remasters in a year or so. And it's not like there's a wild amount of resources being used. This comes out in less than 4 months. I'd more likely say dmc and metro are unnecessary. And aren't people on the hype train for gears remasters? I'd go as far as to say this game is a step up from those despite lack of MP. Why shouldn't it get the treatment?

OB1Biker3317d ago

When TLOUR was released I envied the people who never played it before and were going to play first time the best version..
Its the other way round now as I haven t played this game and cant wait for it.. got to go back to my GOW on vita games just before :)

spacewarrior13317d ago

if a person missed the games out then thats their problem. it only takes 2 mins to go on Amazon and order a PS3 and the game and they could receive it a few days after. also people forgetting the game is also on PS Now which was designed with people getting a chance to replay or play games they missed. just because a bunch of lazy cheapskates couldn't afford to buy a PS3 i now have to suffer these stupid pointless lazy ports.

souldestroyer143317d ago

They. Can't afford a ps3 but can afford a. Ps4? That doesn't make much sense.

ginsunuva3317d ago

A lot of people missed out on a lot of games.

Should we remaster every game every generation?

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3316d ago
Jackhass3318d ago

I'd agree -- I'd remake all the games. There's really not much more this series can do. It's gone as big and crazy as it can get. But I would like more polished, better looking versions of the games.

iamnsuperman3318d ago

I am a little surprised they didn't do all of them. The idea of releasing this is clear. A new God of War is comming. But they should have gone for a trilogy

ValKilmer3318d ago

If Microsoft can remaster all the Halos, Sony should remaster all the God of Wars.

It can be done.

fanboysmackdown3318d ago

Totally agree.....they could charge $60 for all three and that would satisfy and justify the release I think. I've never played through all three but would if it was given a proper remaster. And PS Now just doesn't cut it.

TXIDarkAvenger3318d ago

I disagree.

There are a lot more mythologies that God of War can explore. There isn't really any need for a remake.

ValKilmer3318d ago

It's a tough call. Kind of like The Last of Us: Remastered, the game looked beautiful on PS3.

It's sort of a DVD to Blu-ray sort of jump, but this game is a masterpiece, so it deserves to be played by in the best way possible.

Relientk773318d ago

I don't want remasters, and I'm not getting this

ValKilmer3318d ago

Did you play Last of Us Remastered?

JasonKCK3318d ago (Edited 3318d ago )

Getting sick of them myself. It's like last gen all over again. Deja vu anyone? I think if they have remake anything, they should go back to the Sega, N64 PS1, PS2, Xbox days. Last gen games are too new IMO.

Jalva3318d ago

They're not going to waste that much time and money, they just want a quick buck, and they know that many gamers are dumb enough to play ball.

tdogchristy903318d ago

I would have preferred heavy rain.

pivotplease3317d ago

Uncharted trilogy would have to be my top one. I would also get one of mgs4 if it proved worthwhile (doing away with installs and polishing up some of the environment textures).

N311V3316d ago

I'm excited for a GoW III remaster but would also like all the remaster you suggest aswell.

Show all comments (109)
30°

Video Chums Top 10 Remasters on PlayStation Plus

"There are new PlayStation Plus tiers and I've been enjoying many remasters after subscribing to Premium so here are my 10 favourites." - A.J. Maciejewski from Video Chums

Read Full Story >>
videochums.com
170°

PlayStation Store Games Under $15 Sale: Over 400 Games Under $15

Daily Video Game writes: "PlayStation Store has just launched another new digital game sale that has over 400 games under $15, including many AAA games titled "Games Under $15 Sale" for PlayStation 5 and PlayStation 4 gamers right now!"

Read Full Story >>
dailyvideogame.com
anast680d ago (Edited 680d ago )

Dragon's Dogma and XCOM 2 are the best deals. The rest of the games are still overpriced. I would say 8.99 is good for AC: Origins, but you need to put $10 more into MTs to avoid the grind that slows down the story. So, the game is actually 18.99.

It's not on this list, but Pathfinder: Kingmaker is only $9.99. This is a deal if you have a current gen. consoles, as it runs poorly on prev. gen.

hangdang680d ago

I beat AC origins without grinding or spending any money on MTX?

anast680d ago

I had to grind for side missions. So, did many other people.

HeliosHex680d ago

Has anyone been able to login in to the ps store on ps5 I haven't been able to in days and my network is good.

RedDevils680d ago

Reset or shutdown your PS5. I always can go login to PS5, in fact just a moment ago.

HeliosHex679d ago

Hey thanks again. Although the shutdown/reset didn't work i found that resetting the mdm and hub did the trick. I use a Lan network instead of wifi. In case anyone has a similar setup and problem.

RedDevils679d ago

I forgot to mention about the router reset, that usually do the trick when it come to network problems happen with iphone/android. btw np

940°

God of War Will Run up to 60FPS With Performance Mode on PS5

Santa Monica have confirmed that God of War (PS4) will run up to 60FPS on PS5 with the performance mode selected. Additionally save transfer for both God of War (PS4) and God of War 3 Remastered will be supported.

Read Full Story >>
mobile.twitter.com
NeoGamer2321270d ago (Edited 1270d ago )

For sure this is awesome. God of War is my favorite Sony franchise! Played every God of War game to date including the remasters and on PSP! Can;t wait for the new game in 2021!

potatoseal1270d ago

God Of War: Ragnarok - 2021

It's enough to make you shed a tear

bouzebbal1270d ago

I'm proud for platinuming every single one of them..
60fps is worth a try.. Can't wait

Skuletor1270d ago

Even God of War: Betrayal?

NeoGamer2321270d ago

@SickSinceSix
OK, not God of War Betrayal. lol.

@bouzebbal
I am not that great at the genre so I have not platinumed any of the games, but I enjoy them nonetheless. I remember chains of olympus as the first game when i purchased a PSP on a 9.5 hour flight to Italy from North America. I still think that PSP was the best portable gaming device I have ever owned.

Army_of_Darkness1270d ago

That's not really impressive considering how the pro can sometimes hit 60fps on performance mode... I want to see 4k mode at 60fps. The ps5 should be more than capable of that.

NealGamby1269d ago

I’ve never played GOW. Maybe I should try it out.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1269d ago
GamerRN1270d ago (Edited 1270d ago )

I want 60fps in Resolution mode though! That's what I'm holding out for. I want 4k 60 with the graphics cranked up!

I've been waiting to go back and finish this game... I just got past the part where you see the frozen giant and do all that stuff... I want to finish the story!

cell9891270d ago

Whoa easy there let’s wait for the final details on resolution

1270d ago
1nsomniac1270d ago (Edited 1270d ago )

Love this site. Last gen game only manages to hit up to 60fps on new gen console if run in performance mode.

If it’s an Xbox game it gets ripped apart. If it’s a Sony game it gets gushed over.

I agree with GamerRN I’m not interested in performance mode. This is next gen it should be 60fps in resolution mode!

smashman981270d ago

60 fps was already hit in performance mode on ps4 pro some I'm hoping the same thing.

1nsomniac1270d ago

After a little reading it appears they’re not patching it at all, it’s just running as is. Therefore the games frame rates are capped so it’ll only reach what the engine lets it.

So not sure how this was even news in the first place!

Teflon021270d ago

1n
Not really, I see alot more of the opposite now. Pretty sure it could easily run 60 in performance if it was capped at 60. They'd just have to make sure it has a mode that carried performance mode features and caps 60fps. If the game is updated for PS5 features and such and only runs 1080p60 you'll see ppl complaining. The details on resolution hasn't been out so the assumption is it'll run a good rest if it's updated

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1270d ago
SamTheGamer1270d ago

So basically they said game will on backward compatibility mode and no next gen patch yet.

dlocsta1270d ago ShowReplies(8)
darthv721270d ago

Performance mode is a must have nowadays. Since getting the enhanced systems... I cant play any other way (on games that support it)

I_am_Batman1270d ago

The game already had that on PS4 Pro though. It doesn't sound like it'll take advantage of the increased processing power of the PS5 for now.

Nitrowolf21270d ago

only it will be stable rather than jumping between 40to60

I_am_Batman1270d ago

Hopefully. But "Up to 60 FPS" doesn't sound very stable to me. We'll see.

JEECE1270d ago

If it has an unlocked framerate, it should.
I don't like the "up to 60 fps" language either, but I get the impression it is them covering themselves so that no one can take footage of it dropping to 57 in one very specific instance and then do the whole "Sony lied" thing online. Remember the idiotic, "only 100 games will be backward compatible" nonsense, and how long it took for that to die?

FanboySpotter1270d ago

The wording is bothering me. "Up to" ig that's fair since it's not ps5 optimized and only bc.

JEECE1270d ago

Feels like insurance against twitter trolls to me. Because if they say it plays at 60 fps locked, even if that's true 99.99 percent of the time, some nub will record it dropping slightly once, then make a big deal about it.

I_am_Batman1270d ago (Edited 1270d ago )

If it's 99.99% running at 60fps, that's for all intends and purposes as good as locked 60fps. That's generally accepted and I can't remember an example where framedrops this rare ever caused any backlash. I don't think they are worried about a vocal minority of console warriors making a fool of themselves, by claiming otherwise.

I think it's much more likely that they have to lower clocks to guarantee compatibility, which causes it to perform similarly to the PS4 Pro. Another possibility I can think of is that it runs at 60fps boosted most of the time, but some big enough chunks of the game experience framedrops due to some very specific low-level optimisation that is harder for the PS5 hardware to emulate.

It's all speculation though and hopefully we'll find out before launch when the embargo for backwards compatibility lifts.

RonsonPL1270d ago (Edited 1270d ago )

Don't be worried. Be certain
that there's no stable 60fps mode :( if they use words like this. This means it wobbles and is 60fps at times and it's not at times. If we talk about a PS4 game, this is absolutely horrible news.
There's 0,00001% chance it means 60fps 99,9999% and a drop for half a second once per game walkthrough, but first, it's so unlikely I'd say it's impossible, and secondly, if it means drops even in certain rare scenarios like some alpha effects in exlosions (I know, it's God of War. Just using an example) and stable 60fps otherwise, it's still a very bad news, cause it means either the devs are stupid or PS5 doesn't have the power to even run PS4 games at doubled framerate. The stupid dev scenario would require them to go for locked 1440p res or something significantly higher than PS4pro in performance mode, possibly with some unnecesary additional details or quality settings. PS5 should be able to maintain rock solid 60fps in GoW at 1440p. Now I'm scared it's too slow for that.
Backward compatibility mode doesn't matter much as it's like playing the PC game on a faster PC with a different CPU architecture. In the end, you either have the power needed, or you don't.

This also means there will be no rock solid 60fps mode for God Of War 2 or the GoW 2 won't be designed with PS5 in mind. If it's designed around PS4's limits, then it's not totally impossible but uncertain at least.

RonsonPL1270d ago (Edited 1270d ago )

About the performance:
There's a question of how fast the train goes vs. how many waggons it can pull. PS5 optimizations might help adding some stuff but not necessarily allow to process the same amount of objects faster. Even x360 -> Xone meant easy 60fps ports of pastgen games with significant improvements. Now it's not clear by now if we'll even get the same between PS4->PS5 and PS4->Xbox X generation jump.
Whatever the GoW 3 on PS5 will be, I don't think there are any chances for rock solid 60fps mode in that either, especially when raytracing will leave gaps if turned on, if there are not assets prepared for non-Rt lighting. GoW 3 will be PS5 only.
This is a very stupid and it's yet another step in wrong direction in my opinion as I preferred Gow 1-3 60fps and action focused gameplay rather than all that cinematic and narrative stuff which meant a regression in terms of gameplay. Simply put, GoW PS4 is less fun to play than PS2 and PS3 games were for me. By far. It was a Slasher. First they changed it into a TPP game, then poisoned the gameplay even more by abandoning 60fps gameplay (to be fair, I was already disappointed with drops in GoW 3 on PS3, but at least that was default (and only) mode and the game kept 60fps in many places allowing at least to get the feeling and "wow" factor coming with 60fps. And of course the gameplay mechanics were designed around it too, allowing for more variety and more enjoyable gameplay mechanics and visuals.

Sad to see the once great game series ending up like this. I'm sick and tired of "narrative is the only thing that matters!" approach. I wasn't a fan of ND, Insomiac, Sucker Punch, Sony Santa Monica, back in PS2 era because I cared about the stories. I was yelling "those guys are the best!" whenever I played their games because they were super fun to play, with gameplay being the priority, a game made by gamers for gamers. Not by some people who'd rather be in Hollywood, telling stories and who think movies and stories are a higher culture than gaming, who think they are so much better when they make cinematic experiences. And about the last part, "for gamers", it's probably why this comment will get 100 disagree score, but modern gamers often are not aware of what a gameplay oriented game can be, if done by one of those "best of the best" studios. It's because there are almost no such games nowadays. Even my peers tend to forget. PS2 was released 20 years ago.
Just look how many people were surprised how fun DMC 5 is to play.
But you won't get the praise on Twatter if you're just that guy who makes games (you know, that entertainment for nerds). You will get it if your game is reviewed like a movie. What is the character development, what's the story, what quality the narrative and screenplay is. Then you are above that silly gaming stuff. Now you are a serious artist. You are above. You are among those Hollywood hot shots.

Sadly many gamers love movies so much they don't even realize when they're getting robbed from gameplay. Then you see all the high scores for mediocre gameplay games, and 10/10 for GoW even despite the fact its gameplay is not even at 80% of what it could be if the game was focused on it. Yes. I dare to say it: GoW gameplay score is 7/10 or even lower. Same goes for TloU 2, Detroit: Become Human and many others.
None of those games hit that top level of quality for gameplay and fun factor. And just look how it looked back in PS2 era.
ALL of the "god tier" devs delivered gameplay for 9/10 and 10/10. ALL of them.
Now none.
60fps on PS2 vs 30fps on PS4/5 accidentally overlaps with these differences.

MrNinosan1270d ago

Que?
This must’ve been the most silly trollpost I’ve seen on n4g, and that is on a site filled with trolls.

Write a diary about something you like instead man. That might help you get sane.

RonsonPL1270d ago (Edited 1270d ago )

@MrNinosan

OK, Let's take the situation apart.

1. Who presented arguments and an subjective opinion everyone is entitled to?
2. Who wrote a pointless comment just to insult and express disagreement as if the downvote button was not named "disagree"?

Now. Tell me, but honestly. Who's the troll here?

I'm too old for this, seriously. Give me an argument or buzz off.

Harryvok1270d ago

Performance mode in the original had frame rates up to 60fps (that was the cap), but generally hovered around 45fps. 4K mode was locked at a 30fps cap, although it did dip of course. This game isn't getting a patch that changes the modes or resolutions, it's just running in BC mode with the performance mode going up to 60fps and 4K LOCKED to 30fps cap, just as in the original game. It isn't a reflection on the performance of the PS5 at all. It's just running the game as it always way in BC mode with the extra power pushing the performance mode up to its 60fps cap.

Also 'up to' makes sense. It will undoubtedly drop a couple frames here and there. Xbox 360 and Xbox One games with a 60fps cap are still dropping frames here and there in BC mode on the Series X. You're not going to notice a few frames here and there at 60fps.

RonsonPL1270d ago (Edited 1270d ago )

@Harryvok

""Also 'up to' makes sense.""

PS4pro was around 40fps as you mentioned. That's just +50% more raw power required. I understand what you're saying about the compatibility mode, but I disagree. it's not a full emulation, where you could actually make a very valid point that improving the performance by 50% might actually require much more because of the fact you're emulating things.
PS4 had x86 CPU cores and Radeon GCN architecture. PS5 has x86 CPU and a Radeon.
We'll disagree on what you can extrapolate from this, and I cannot be certain either as there's not enough information available yet, but I understand

next

""You're not going to notice a few frames here and there at 60fps.""

That's both 100% true and 100% false. Objectively this is both.

Depends on which display type you're using for gaming and then up to what are your priorities. If you can endure the horrible flicker but you simply are not interested in playing games with broken motion reproduction, then you'll not only notice instantly even drops to 57fps, but the the experience of playing the game will be significantly degraded. It's not possible to explain this without actually showing the game in properly working motion-friendly mode, so maybe this changes your mind and if not, at least makes you willing to allow other points of view as equal and valid: If the flicker is so bad in 60Hz mode, imagine how awesome are the benefits if some people are willing to suffer playing with it.
(and I suffered it gladly while playing God of War on PS2)

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1270d ago
SmokinAces1270d ago

I think people are taking the wording out of context, it just means its select-able up to that number. I'll give you an analogy to hopefully help it make better sense. Say you get in an elevator of a sixty story building, you can choose to go to the thirtieth floor or you can go to the sixtieth floor, if you choose to go "UP TO" the sixtieth floor it doesn't mean you're going to go to the fifty fifth floor and then back down to the fiftieth and then up to the fifty eighth and so on. I dont believe the term implies fluctuation it just represents the highest choice you can go "UP TO". That's just my two cents hope it makes sense, guess we'll just have to wait and see though if that's the case.

UnHoly_One1270d ago

What???

That's a bunch of crap.

It means it runs at 60, but not all the time. That is the ONLY reason to add those words in.

Now it could be that it might hit 59 a couple rare instances, or it could mean that it is mostly 45, but peaks at 60 occasionally, or anywhere in between.

The core of the phrase is that it is absolutely not perfectly locked at 60 at all times.

RonsonPL1270d ago

No. When the game runs at 60, it runs at 60.
When it struggles more often than rare and occasional stuff, like explosions or one boss fight per 20 hour gameplay, then it's called up to 60

Historically, looking at PS4 generation, up to means anything between "almost never" to "a bit" through "half of the time or a bit more than half".

Examples of up to 60fps which were totally NOT 60fps: Tomb Raider (the first new one on PS4). It was up to, but was nowhere near the experience you get from stable 60.
I never ever saw anyone complaining for calling it 60fps when you get a drop once per 5 hours. I call PS2 God Of War game 60fps. This one had some rare drops as well.
Up to means NOT stable 60. Period.

SmokinAces1269d ago

@UnHoly_One

I appreciate your opinion and point of view, I dont appreciate the "bunch of crap" comment, I have no issue with a counter point but it would be nice if it didn't require the hostility. We dont know if that's the only reason for those words, we truly won't know it until an official analysis is done and in the end you might be right but it could very well be a stable and locked 60fps experience as well and that's what I believe it will be and I was just trying to give an analogy as to why I felt that way.

Happy gaming friend.

Show all comments (104)