180°

Why The Division Is Doing Multiplayer Right

Clipping Error discuss why they think The Division is doing multiplayer in such a way that players will enjoy much more than in other games.

Read Full Story >>
clippingerror.com
joab7773340d ago

You could also group up with other ppl, go search for lpot, and then help each other get on the helo...I would imagine.

jriquelme_paraguay3340d ago

i dont believe in ubisoft anymore. lets SEE the game...

Blaze9293340d ago

Ubi-lying too much, so I'll wait and see.

-Foxtrot3340d ago

How can you say it's doing it right when we haven't had much in depth gameplay on the multiplayer

I just hope for an off line mode. Shouldnt force people to go online only. Seems like a game you can get involved in by your self

pompombrum3340d ago

Isn't it supposed to be an MMO though? An offline MMO makes no sense to me and defeats the purpose of the game's initial design purpose.

thereapersson3340d ago

I'll have to see more info on this game before I judge on whether or not the multiplayer is up to par. We really haven't seen much of this title. Isn't it due out at the end of this year?

DarkOcelet3340d ago

Its a shame they are blocking many Single Player fans just like that.

I wanted to explore the beauty of this world SOLO just like Fallout and Elder Scrolls.

Roccetarius3340d ago (Edited 3340d ago )

No, it's simply a co-op MP game. Think of it like an online Evolve game.

wsoutlaw873340d ago (Edited 3340d ago )

Lol i dont go to a racing game saying they should have a mode where you dont drive because I don't like driving in games. If they want to make an mmo/coop game then don't try to change it. I get why some people say they don't like mp games, but you haven't even tried it. Coop can be extremely fun and theres no reason to be adverse to it with out playing. I heard the same thing in destiny but coop and the coop only parts are so much better.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3340d ago
KiwiViper853340d ago

I agree, I think having co-op only will totally destroy immersion. I want to explore and take my time not rush to the next mission/gun battle like you know would happen in co-op

wsoutlaw873340d ago

Then play with people like you. there are plenty of ways to find players to play with. I think some people hear mp and think cod and its not like that with every game.

ZombieKiller3340d ago

I agree FoxTrot....how do we know when all they have shown is MP presentations set up to wow us? On top of that, it's Ubisoft. So far this gen, they have failed miserably with games. Unity was atrocious. Far Cry was a rehash of FC3 (or at least it felt like it when I played it through).

I noticed (particularly this gen) that Ubisoft games look good in the presentation. It shows the potential....but then you get the game in your hands and it's either a glitchy mess or not nearly as good as promised.

Not saying don't buy, but approach with caution as this one, like the rest, looks AWESOME in the presentation. I'm hyped for it too, trust me but with the track record so far, it seems like it's too far off to tell anything.

JackBNimble3340d ago (Edited 3340d ago )

Definitely not a day 1 buy, not with UBI's track record any way. I would hold off until you get word on whether or not they screwed this one up first.

Although this one this game is one of the few games that do interest me , but thanks to UBI's repeated f**k ups I'll wait first.

freshslicepizza3340d ago (Edited 3340d ago )

it's their game so why can't they make a game that requires online interaction with others? nobody is forcing you to buy the game and if they make it perfectly clear it requires an internet connection to play what's the problem? we get hundreds of games released per year yet you want to make an issue out of this one just because it requires you to be online?

it's their choice to alienate people from playing if they cannot connect online or don't want to be required to be connected to play. why do people defend short games that charge $60 and at the same time don't want to spend $60 on a game that requires an online connection that might be good and you want to keep for awhile?

are you not connected online when you wrote this comment? is the system you want to play this game not connected to the internet? or are you just speaking on behalf of others who are not connected online?

what i will say is games like these need to not have connection issues because if they do customers should be able to ask for their money back depending on the situation.

Transporter473340d ago

I think this game is going to be Online only like Destiny which could be a good or bad thing. We shall wait and see.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3340d ago
Thatguy-3103340d ago

No judgement should be made until said product hits retail. The concept and what it aims to do is amazing and hopefully they're able to execute it.

GreetingsfromCanada3340d ago

How about we wait until the game releases or for more confirmed info for that matter.

Excalibur3340d ago

Sounds very interesting, makes me want to play it even more now.

Show all comments (34)
80°

Exclusive Q&A: “Tom Clancy’s: The Division: Hunted” Author Thomas Parrott

from paulsemel.com: In this exclusive Q&A, the author of the new technothriller based on "Tom Clancy's: The Division" discusses how it ties to the games while also bringing its own story to a close.

Read Full Story >>
paulsemel.com
rpad74d ago

did you edit out the parts where the author repeated everything you asked?

50°

Ubisoft's The Division series just had 80% slashed off its price on Steam

If you're looking to try out an exciting, team-based shoot 'em up, The Division is currently on sale on Steam!

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
170°

Stop Forcing Multiplayer Into Single Player Games

TIM WHITE WRITES: "Multiplayer or single player? Developers, you can do both, just not willy-nilly."

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
Flawlessmic381d ago

I am in absolute agreement with the OP 👌

shinoff2183380d ago

I hate when I see single player games and see people begging for multi-player. Jeez guys it don't need to be on every game. Latest one I seen was atomic heart.

-Foxtrot380d ago

Multiplayer or even co-op

If it was always a single player game then that's how it is

Inverno380d ago

It's a trend that never really went away. For me multiplayer in a primarily SP focused game was an excuse for DLC. Then there's the mentality gamers had that adding multiplayer makes a game worth the price, otherwise it should be half price for half a game. A way of thinking devs reassured when they started adding multiplayer to their sequels. We see the same with multiplayer focused games getting SP in their sequels.

Flawlessmic380d ago

Tbh multilayer now is a way to add live service and mtx elements, very rarely does it come of well.

What single players game used to be in a lot of cases now require 3 other people for keeping to really enjoy it and I hate having to rely on others to get the maximum from a game.

Sp should be sp, if devs want to add a separate multi mode then that's fine with me, the legends addition to ghost of tshushima was fricking sick but totally separate to the main game. Sick of co op too.

Hofstaderman380d ago

I remember when certain single player games had them as included optional modes that was played on the couch. Had brilliant times with Syphon Filter and Golden Eye. Me and my bro used to used to fight over who would play as Gabe even though it was technically just a skin. Good times.

Dagexon379d ago

I didn't notice your comment before I added mine.
But good times indeed

Show all comments (15)