The Division is without a doubt one of the most anticipated games, scheduled next year. First time ever the game was shown to wide audience was during Ubi's E3 2013 Press Conference. And gamers across the world were speachless. Back then it looked just awesome.
Wanna know how it looked like comparing to this year's gameplay?
Just check this video. 2013 vs 2014 vs 2015 compared side-by-side.
from paulsemel.com: In this exclusive Q&A, the author of the new technothriller based on "Tom Clancy's: The Division" discusses how it ties to the games while also bringing its own story to a close.
If you're looking to try out an exciting, team-based shoot 'em up, The Division is currently on sale on Steam!
TIM WHITE WRITES: "Multiplayer or single player? Developers, you can do both, just not willy-nilly."
I hate when I see single player games and see people begging for multi-player. Jeez guys it don't need to be on every game. Latest one I seen was atomic heart.
Multiplayer or even co-op
If it was always a single player game then that's how it is
It's a trend that never really went away. For me multiplayer in a primarily SP focused game was an excuse for DLC. Then there's the mentality gamers had that adding multiplayer makes a game worth the price, otherwise it should be half price for half a game. A way of thinking devs reassured when they started adding multiplayer to their sequels. We see the same with multiplayer focused games getting SP in their sequels.
Tbh multilayer now is a way to add live service and mtx elements, very rarely does it come of well.
What single players game used to be in a lot of cases now require 3 other people for keeping to really enjoy it and I hate having to rely on others to get the maximum from a game.
Sp should be sp, if devs want to add a separate multi mode then that's fine with me, the legends addition to ghost of tshushima was fricking sick but totally separate to the main game. Sick of co op too.
I remember when certain single player games had them as included optional modes that was played on the couch. Had brilliant times with Syphon Filter and Golden Eye. Me and my bro used to used to fight over who would play as Gabe even though it was technically just a skin. Good times.
Oh here we go.. Let it go the final product will always change there reason for slight visual downgrade. Its still going be good game if your soo upset cos this then dont buy it.
Most 3rd party games shown at events specially early builds there to look good get people pumped.
Its a selling point but come on really many also look for something new and core gameplay or story ect ect..
I understand why you want to point out the downgrades but sometimes I feel its to put people off or start putting Ubi EA whoever down.
Anyways my thoughts nothin personal at you man.
This game will be good
The problem isn't the downgrade, it's that ubisoft always announces a game to early falsely advertising the graphics and then when the game is later shown it looks like less not "bad" the game actually looks good just not as before.
I preorder based on gameplay. Too many prople have grown to care about the level of graphical detail!
It truly does amaze me that on the same site were people boast about the bumber of games the ps4 has because of all the indies that so many complain and claim false advertisement when it comes to the graphics of a none commercial trailer. If you got your hopes up because of a trailer at an attention grabing games conference than you lack common sense! It's a demo promo not a commercial. You can easily tell how old people are and their emotinal maturity just by the level of their xomments on this site!