MONG writes: "The dreaded debate: physical games vs. digital games. Brought on by a simple chat about Super Smash Bros. for 3DS, two members of the MONG team are about to duke it out. In one corner, Harry, supporting the physical copies. In the other, Mike, the champion of digital copies. Who will win? Let’s see their thoughts below:"
These groundbreaking video games changed gaming forever and drew in scores of fans in the process.
These are some of the greatest games similar to Blasphemous to play while waiting for the much-anticipated Blasphemous 2.
NetherRealm confirms its Mortal Kombat franchise has sold over 80 million copies in the last 30 years, and here's how it competes against other fighters.
Don't care what anyone says, Smash isn't a traditional fighting game. May as well call Powerstone and Playstation All Stars fighting games. They're more of an arena fighter /party game.
Including Smash Bros in a list of fighting games, is like including GTA in Racing games.
Do we really need a fanboy war for this? I mean really it's only a matter of personal preference and taste. You get the game in the end anyway no matter what method you choose.
We've had this debate since the early 2000's, I don't see them going anyway anytime soon, mostly because of things like Christmas, Birthdays, collectors, and many people not being able to consistently rely on internet.
More likely they will go the way of DVD's where they have not disappeared, because there is still a large market, but not being nearly as big as before.
Myself, I still prefer physical games. You actually have more rights, I like to lend/swap with friends and I find this very appealing to look at.
http://half-decent.com/wp-c...
If digital games were cheaper than physical copies I would go that route a bit more.
I like digital downloads because of how easy and quick it is to just start gaming but I prefer physical discs for my game collection. Cases are awesome and definitely for those retro NES/SNES collections.