It’s hard to separate what a game is trying to be and what it does well from what we want it to be. Dead Space 3 fulfills its goals with gusto, it provides an end to a chapter of the Dead Space saga and of course opens a new one. It makes sense for the climax of a three-part story to be so action-oriented and to have trouble recreating the tension and slow burn of the previous games. Things were going to get resolved, and it was going to take guns and large set pieces to do so. All the pieces fit together and they do what they’re expected to do. I don’t think anyone is going to feel cheated out of their $60.
For many fans of the series though, this won’t be the game they want.
If EA and Motive Studio plan on remaking all the main Dead Space entries, they have to change a lot of what made Dead Space 3 so divisive.
Simple, do not bother with a Dead Space 3 remake. Rather have a new entry for Dead Space.
Remaking 3 would need to be a reworked and somewhat changed remake as 3 was flawed in most peoples eyes and the worst entry.
WTMG's Kyle Nicol:
"Was Dead Space 3 really that bad?
Well, it’s a complicated question. Dead Space 3 is undeniably the weakest of the trilogy. It’s a game that deviates so far from the original formula, that it throws a lot of what made Dead Space special in the first place out of the window. Although, where it does make up for it is one of the best cooperative shooters on the market, even after all this time. Do I recommend playing this game ten years later? Hell yes. But make sure your expectations are in the right place. It has a lot of problems that bring it down."
With the upcoming Dead Space Remake, we replay and rank the original three games.
Dead Space
Dead Space 2
The Callisto Protocol
...
...uhm...
...
...Lost Planet 3?
They need to seriously continue this ip with a new entry. Even if it's just another movie I don't care I love everything about this game.