You don't have to use it. As for the screens, you realize that changing outfits isn't that hard, what do you think happens when you trade a player in the game? The uniforms are just like costumes in fighting games. #6.1

Yeah we discussed it at great length as three of us played it. I am loving it so far. #1.1.4

No I totally agree, I hope it lasts longer. I went on a rant about it more on the podcast, because the online is really a lot of fun. #1.1.2

Actually I am the admin at FilmWatch, not N4G, I have no control over these stories. #3.3.1

Last I checked though, Amazon was not Microsoft, I personally think it is stupid if they do charge that much, but everyone assumes it is truth now when nothing has been announced. It just gets old seeing "professional" journalists posting speculation as truth. #3.1.3

The fact that none of the pricing is confirmed for one, plus he states Move is $100 which is true, if you don't want the navigation controller. I could care less about either of them, but this is the kind of journalism that gets people arguing on this site. It gets hits based on fanboy wars. #3.1.1

I hate misinformed journalism. #3

Seriously?
The first game had this feature, how is this news?? #2

Because it is for both versions, the review is the same across both platforms. #3.1

@UNCyrus
We did not have access to the 360 version so reviewing it would have been unfair, though we have heard like many others out there that the game is substantially better on PS3. That is the reason I added the editor's note. #2.4

Yes I am fully aware that it is BS and that I suck. You are right I play games for no reason other than to ruin the dreams of RPG fanboys and screw with Metacritic. I am an evil person and your enlightenment has forced me to see the error of my ways. Oh thank you oh noble and kind sir. #7.1

I am giving the 360 version a 4.5 and the PS3 a 4.0 just to screw up MetaCritic ;) #4.4

Yes, actually they all do. None of us are paid to score games, we do it for fun and because we love playing them. You can complain all day because your game didn't get the score you felt it should, but at the same time that is based on YOUR preference. We all review games based on our tastes and how it compares to others in the genre, as well as many other factors.

And you shouldn't go by what others say to choose your games, but also no one is going to believe what you say ei... #4.2

Just to let you know it was two different reviewers. There are going to be variations in scores an opinions. #3.1

I tried extremely hard to avoid spoilers, the story is so well written I didn't want to give anything away. #11.1

@1.2
Actually I reviewed the retail version. I found a copy at Best Buy before Christmas and have been playing it since. The final retail US version has not been fixed, it has been in stores for two weeks now. #1.7

If they claim it to be unplayable why did they give it an 8.2? Just curious as I found the PS3 version inferior, but certainly not unplayable. #3.1

I played the game on both systems, but I spend so much more time on Xbox Live it seems to be my stand-in for online play. Outside of the PS3 bugs at launch the online performance felt the same for both games, I changed the wording to be more generic now. #2.1

Yes that was a beautiful game, Russell finally completed some passes, though two interceptions is just unacceptable. Raider Nation! #9.5

If it makes you feel better my second opinion column states 10/10. #9.2