CRank: 5Score: 0

Same can be said for linear games, such as Uncharted.

177d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Angry Joe is not a good reviewer. Respectable maybe, but not good.

178d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

What makes it so great? Just curious, still waiting on my copy to be delivered.

180d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I mean I kind of agree with you, I'm just saying that to the developers, they don't want to risk souring the raiding experience for those willing to take a chance on a raid by implementing matchmaking. Because most people, and this definitely applies to the vast majority of gamers, will take a single, short, bad experience to heart, most won't put up with a bad first impression, and I think the devs would rather the raid be a mystery that lingers in the minds of those who haven...

184d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

" Whats the difference between me looking for complete strangers on my own and Bungie having match making?"

Lfg makes you put in an effort, makes it less likely you'll get someone who will drop out.

If they allowed matchmaking for raids, then the guys that have no knowledge, experience, patience or motivation to complete a raid will come flooding in. Those people who won't take the raid seriously enough to try for more than a few wipes...

185d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

It shocks me how some people can play a game more than a few times. I mean I can kind of get it with games that have choices that make the game highly replayable, choices like different characters/classes to play as, different story paths, maybe different playstyles with new experimentation, but you can usually get most games like that done in 2 or 3 playthroughs, but I can't see how someone can go through a game like say Uncharted after you've gotten the platinum.


187d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Yeah. It could end up being "buy 20 retail games and the points you get from that will afford you one 15 dollar indie title off the eshop".

188d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment


Or rather, instead of the insulting thing you just said, they say it's confusing because it requires you to know what's going on through other means of lore, like the books, to truly know what's going on, that or you need to have read or watched the lore (books, tv shows, novels, etc.) to fully appreciate the story, the characters, and the importance of what's going on.

Something might happen in the game that a simple halo player might no...

190d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Have been worried about this myself ever since they announced your character will have a voice. I'll wait and see, but it is something to be concerned about.

191d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Except that it's a game, not a car, it's not that big a deal if it doesn't work for a while. I've bought and played a lot of games in my time, and honestly have never been truly pissed more than a few times, because that 9 times out of 10, for me, if a game is broken, it's usually fixed within the first week, max I think I've ever had to wait was a month. And even then, there's always one mode of the game that does work, so it's rarely ever full on broken.

193d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

I don't think how broken a game is should be taken into account at all in the score. They should definitely mention the crap out of it, but 9 times out of 10, a "broken" game will be fixed, usually within the first month of release. Score the game itself pretending it's unbroken, I look to the scoring system as a gauge of the games actual quality, I look to the actual words of a review to tell me if it's broken or not.

194d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

So? Not every game you like deserves a 10. Not every game that gets critically acclaimed deserves a 9 or a 10. People have different tastes. 8 is still a magnificent score. Now had it been a 6 or less, yeah that's a red flag (as is is review for Bioshock Infinite), but it was an 8. Please stop perpetuating this idea that anything below a 9, regardless of how good you and others think it is, is somehow a bad score or something to criticize a reviewer over. You're the type of people res...

202d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Not instant enough

202d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

"Master Chief Collection is still plagued with issues almost 12 months later, and will NEVER be fixed"

It's certainly playable for me. If we're going to get technical about it, and consider any small bug or problem as "broken", then every game would be broken, as every game has bugs.

That sataristic quote was to make fun of the morons who have actually said this or agreed with this statement. With uncharted, people's standar...

207d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nope, not at full price, not without at the very LEAST Uncharted 2s multiplayer. I'd buy this for 15, maybe.

"Durrr master chief collekshon included mp for all gaemz and luk what happened, it was broek, I'm glad i get less content for more money, durr"

Maybe so, but I'd rather have a several month long broken remastered collection (mp wise)that eventually gets fixed than a remastered collection that will NEVER have multiplayer, not even...

207d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

What we have here folks, is someone so desperate to differentiate themselves, they're willing to defy all logic, all fact and all wrongdoing. The way to deal with these people is to either ignore them, or feed them with what they want (attention for being special and different).

On an unrelated note, you're smart, special and better than everyone else, kalebninja. You know better than anyone else, and can see through the lies after lies after lies of the constant, num...

212d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment


216d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

" the people who "hate" on this game are mostly fans who actually believed in bungie and the potential this game had."

No, most of the more vocal complainers are people who didn't give Destiny a fair chance. If you haven't even beat a single raid, your opinion of the game is not valid, and the majority of the people I see complaining are lazy people who on principle of laziness, will not spend 5-10 minutes on a group gathering service to play...

230d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

"It was done with a purpose, a feeling of resolve"

Gotta disagree with you there. Mgs4s areas to me felt ridiculously unresolved as I moved through them, trying to silently take out everyone while enemies just kept infinitely respawning. Really broke immersion for me. While the enemies in mgs v will respawn, they only do once you quit the instance and come back, which can be explained away by new soldiers being called to defend that outpost while you're gone, wh...

230d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

It could definitely be better, and I do kind of agree that treks to and from bases can be a hassle, but I still think this beats the hell out if previous metal gear games linear structure.

The stealth, controls, mechanics are light years ahead of anything previous mgs games had to offer, the staggering amount of detail in the gameplay and many ways you can approach something more than make up for the story imo.

And I'm even enjoying the story more than pr...

234d ago 4 agree10 disagreeView comment