CRank: 5Score: 0


1926d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I am having no framerate issues what so ever in the game and I am 31 hours in. Plays pretty smoothly here.

Graphically, to be honest, I am surprised they managed to make the game look this good on the 360.

I am like yourself, my PC would probably run Far Cry 3 on medium settings but I just prefer my console for games.

And to be really honest, I don't really think the game is that well optimised for PC, for the simple fact that the graphic...

1927d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

taquito - the problem isn't the graphics its the gameplay.
The engine is poorly optimised. Proof of that is the PC version, which barely looks much better then the 360 version and thats a fact, so no need to spout crap and be mad because of the fact that 99% of pc games don't look that much better due to being ports.

I new engine with better graphics isn't going to fix this awful game if the gameplay stays the same.

But why would Activisio...

1928d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Only co-op DLC. Not a big deal then.

I guess thats what the PS3 gets as an 'apology' from Ubisoft, for having the inferior version.

1928d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Don't see the interest in netflix.

Just use torrents to get all my stuff and its free.

1928d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

You may want to look at the comparisons. The 360 version of Far Cry 3 looks much better then the PS3 version, especially the view distance and texture quality.

Now Bethesda may be lazy developers, but Sony is partly to blame for all this.

If the PS3s hardware wasen't so hmm 'unique', then possibly we would see multiplatform games like Far Cry 3 and Skyrim, up to par with the 360 version.

1929d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

This game is simply amazing. Many people seem to be disappointed with the MP. They forget MP is not the main focus of FarCry 3. You play it for the SP.

1929d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

GOTY I think

So many great things to say about this game.

The huge sense of exploration that you feel when you step into the world. The stealth aspects of this game are extremely fun.

And once I got my 'Explosive arrows' OMG things got any better.

1 scenerio. I was simply exploring and I hear this person crying for help. Not far up the road we had some evil dudes, ended up killing them. I browse over the cliff and way...

1930d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Maybe at a later stage? Or maybe Ubi felt Far Cry 3 doesn't fit well with the Wii:U's main audience.

Who knows.

1933d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's a good thing that hunting animals is actually useful, as it allows you to upgrade such things :)

1933d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

You focus on the wrong thing - graphics.

In order to have the same amazing gaming experience that console player do, the graphics have to meet a certain standard, while console gamers are just having an absolute BLAST with this.

This is why I feel sorry for PC gamers - the graphics have to be of 'high standard' in order to get the same awesome experience console gamers do, otherwise it downgrades it for them.

As to the most important ...

1933d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Do Sony know anything about ergonomics and natural hand and finger positioning? The way they designed the DS3 - I guess not

And now LOOK at THIS thing!

*eye roll*

1933d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

LOL Cause for concern.

I am pretty sure a lot of developers/publishers that make much better games would love their games to sell 10M+.

The fact that sales are down for this game (though still damn high compared to other games) is a GOOD thing.

I think some casual gamers are slowly (finally) beocming sick of palying the same game for the past 5 yrs

1933d ago 9 agree0 disagreeView comment

The success of the Wii has paved the way of more casual/kiddy style games, with more attention to simple gameplay.

Wii:U being great would just do the same.

Great for Nintendo (profits)
Great for mom/dad & the kids and those casual 'gamers'
Bad for real gamers

Sadly it seems that more and more, the industry needs casuals to survive, as the number of core gamers seems to continue to decrease.

1934d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

Why make improvements to a game that sells over 10m+ anyway?

Why stop creating sloppy code and optimisation when it still sells 10M+ anyway?

Consumers are to blame

1935d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Even though the 360 versions of multiplatform games do look better, guess what?

PS3 owners are still playing the SAME exact game.


So this whole, it looks better on 360 is only used in console wars, but really doesn't mean much. Remember PS3 gamers are still playing the SAME game.

The big problem with the PS3 is the controller. A 2D controller design used to play 3D game...

1936d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Not sure why people are bothering comparing 360/PS3 launch sales to the Wii:U

Of course the Wii:U is expected to sell more. It's targeted for casual gamers. Much bigger audience.

Lots of parents popping in to buy one for their children.

1937d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

THe problem with the game is it is to heavily scripted as regardds to your targets.

They all follow a certain path and it becomes very predictable.

Would of been much better if it was open worldish as well.

1937d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I came in to this article expecting the player playing the PC version (with a mouse) and I would of said 'Not THAT impressive), since it easy and really doesn't take much skill to aim with a mouse.

But this was done on the PS3? Wow now THAT is skill

Well done to the player

1939d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

One of the problems is the games.
Core type games on a casual gaming device.

Sorry but handhelds are casual.

Nintendo succeeds in handhelds because they offer a massive amount of casual style games, which is 99% of what the handheld market is made up of.

1939d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment