TABSF (User)

  • Trainee
  • 5 bubbles
  • 5 in CRank
  • Score: 62870
""

Comments

But is it a Titan? #8
532d ago by TABSF | View comment
Can't see why you say that Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 pretty much runs every game ever made at max settings.

If people actually do their research and look at review websites Nvidia hold the crown over AMD in performance.

So AMD may have got a promotional deal with Dice but Battlefield 3 runs much better on Intel and Nvidia solutions. Battlefield 4 has the same system requirements as BF3. #2.1.1
535d ago by TABSF | View comment
Show me, where is a link from AMD themselves saying this?

Like I said, it doesn't matter what the PS4 got, PC is beyond it a year before release and that's the truth.

I can send you many links that will show you that AMD's "flagship" CPU FX 8350 gets humiliated by Intel Core i5s and i7 so how will a laptop / mainstream CPU compete, it will not.

PC GPUs can go beyond 1920 by 1080 since 2007, anti-aliasing is a given, 4096... #23.1.1
544d ago by TABSF | View comment
Sure the PS4 is a good piece of tech but to say that what is being done has never been done before is foolish.

They're using an AMD APU solution, AMD have been making them for years now and It basically a PC/Laptop processor that features CPU/GPU/Northbridge

The CPU Jaguar Cores are about 10% quicker than Bobcat however its about 50% slower than Piledriver, furthermore Piledriver is slower than Sandy, Ivybridge and Haswell.

On the GPU sid... #23
544d ago by TABSF | View comment
Truth is AMD CPUs are weak, very weak Core i3 and i5s would easily destroy Jaguar.
Hell AMD flagship CPU FX-8350 (Piledriver) at 5GHz only competes with Core i5s.

Everyone knows the ultimate set-up at the moment is Intel and Nvidia combo. Intel Core i7 4770K and Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

Try arguing it, I send you a 100 links proving me right! #10
550d ago by TABSF | View comment
AMD is just saying this hoping for more CPU sales

Hardcore AMD fans will tell you that Intel are either, just behind, just better or not that much better are not being entirely true to themselves.

Intel has dominated the CPU market since Core 2 Duo was released and since then their has been no comparison.
AMD are competing on price but that's about it.

If you get a FX - 8150 or FX - 8350 then expect to compete with i5 2500K, 3570... #11
566d ago by TABSF | View comment
Interesting

AMD Radeon HD 8970
------------------
1000MHz Core Speed
2304 Unified Shaders
144 Texture Mapping Units = 144GTexel/s
48 Render Output Units = 48GPixel/s
312GB/s Bandwidth (6500MHz x 384bit interface / 8 = 312GB/s)

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780
----------------------
902MHz Core Speed
2304 Unified Shaders
192 Texture Mapping Units = 173.1GTexel/s
48 Render Output Unit... #11
566d ago by TABSF | View comment
Nope you're wrong, HD 8000 will be a new series just like HD 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000 and 7000

Just like every Series there will be OEM variants.

I get Consoles as well for exclusives if its justifiable to get 1 platfrom for a hand full of games.
I've got a PC because I can play all 3rd party games better than the console counter parts plus PC exclusives

Another thing, no backwards compatibility, I can play MS-DOS games on... #4.1
567d ago by TABSF | View comment
Yeah shouldn't be a surprise there is a hole bunch of PC GPUs that can out perform the PS4 and XBO

AMD Radeon
----------
HD 6970
HD 6990
HD 7870 GHz Edition
HD 7870 XT
HD 7950
HD 7970
HD 7970 GHz Edition
HD 7990 (3rd party dual HD 7970)
HD 7990 (AMD official HD 7990)
HD 8870 (OEM)
HD 8950 (OEM)
HD 8970 (OEM)
HD 7970M
HD 8970M

Nvidia GeFo... #2
567d ago by TABSF | View comment | Trolling
For anyone that thinks that Steam is average or not good, I'm incredibly sorry to tell you but you need to be educated and I'm here to do it.
Steam offers so much that no current generation console or next generation console can offer and here is the list:

Steam Greenlight - Supports indie devs, allows gamers to support games
Steam Workshop - Access to thousands of mods for games
Steam Recommendations - See what actual gamers think and friend t... #19
568d ago by TABSF | View comment
Online Passes
DLC
Micro-transactions
Locking the game to one account

These are all measure I support, on Steam I can buy all the games I want put them on a USB 3.0 HDD and take it to a friends house, then sign into my account and play them no problems.

As for 1 time installs, that is a joke. #8
576d ago by TABSF | View comment
They are extreme examples but he said a generation ahead of High-end PCs did he not?!!

The fact is if money was no object PC is about 10 times the performance of PS4 with the most extreme set-up.

That extreme set up (Ultra PC) would be around $10,000 , around 2Kw and about twice the width of a standard PC tower and almost as tall as a desk.

The "Best PC" would be around $3,000 around 700w and would fit in a standard ATX case.
583d ago by TABSF | View comment
This guy is on drugs!!!

The CPU in the PS4 is a laptop processor doubled up and the GPU is claimed by AMD as "Mainstream" not high-end or Enthusiast.

So here we go!!!

PlayStation 4 Spec
CPU = AMD APU Jaguar 8 Cores @ 1.6 or 2GHz
GPU = AMD Radeon HD @ 1.84 TFLOP/s
RAM = 8GB of GDDR5 with a Bandwidth of 176GB/s

Xbox One Spec
CPU = AMD APU Jaguar 8 Cores @ 1.6GHz
GPU = AMD Radeon... #20
583d ago by TABSF | View comment
The PS4 GPU is only around 1.84TFLOP/s so if you do the Calculation of clock speed, unified shaders and cycles you'll get the TFLOP/s

800 MHz x 1156 Cores x 2 Cycles = 1,849,600MFLOP/s or 1,849GFLOP/s or 1.84TFLOP/s

The PS4 at best will compete with a HD 7870 GHz Edition and is no where near the RAW capabilities of a HD 7950 or 7970

HD 7950 = 925 MHz x 1792 Cores x 2 Cycles = 3.31TFLOP/s
HD 7970 = 1050 MHz x 2048 Cores x 2 Cycles... #13
585d ago by TABSF | View comment
There is 27 GPUs out or will be out before the PS4 and NXB will be released. These 27 GPUs are more powerful than the GPUs in the new consoles. Not to mention HD 8000 and GeForce 700 series will be out by then.

These GPUs below can play beyond 1080p above 60fps, even 3840 by 2160 at 30fps. More than what can be said of PS4 (PS4 BF4 720p at 60fps)

AMD Radeon
----------
HD 7950
HD 7970
HD 7970 GHz Edition CFX
HD 7990 (3rd... #53
634d ago by TABSF | View comment
GPUs more powerful than that in the PS4

AMD Radeon
----------
HD 6970
HD 6990
HD 7870 GHz Edition
HD 7870 XT
HD 7950
HD 7970
HD 7970 GHz Edition
HD 7990 (3rd party dual HD 7970)
HD Malta
HD 7970M
HD 8870 (OEM)
HD 8950 (OEM)
HD 8970 (OEM)

Nvidia GeForce
--------------
GTX 480
GTX 570
GTX 580
GTX 590
GTX... #90
634d ago by TABSF | View comment
I agree with born2expire

"Look at it this way, AMD needed the consoles, Nvidia did not. AMD was on shakey ground and experts where giving them a 50/50 chance if they survive 2013, where as Nvidia was in fine shape."

Truth is Intel is destroying AMD on the CPU side with only 1 in 4 CPUs being sold are AMD, on top of that AMD chips cost more to make since they have large die size meaning more materials, worst part is they sell them more competitively... #87
634d ago by TABSF | View comment
Well I was not gonna comment but there is just so much crap its insane.

AMD manufacture CPUs, they acquired ATi and subsequently re-branded them AMD. realising that on CPU power and performance they have been falling behind Intel since Core 2 series they went for the better bang for buck option.

AMD having ATi on side accelerated their APU project. AMD then announced the Fusion project in 2006 which is all about APUs Accelerated Processing Units.
An A... #47
660d ago by TABSF | View comment
Yeah but the difference is Cliffy

EA pull servers
Have crappy limited Beta
Charge $60 for everything
Charge heavily for DLC
Remove services what you could of put money in
Crappy micro-transactions (for stuff unobtainable any other way)

Valve still have servers for games over a decade old
Have extensive on going beta for games already out (patch betas)
Price their games fairly
Usually release DLC... #33
665d ago by TABSF | View comment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 98
Showing: 41 - 60 of 1956