We get it. You liked the game. Now please; stop.
I'm telling you not everyone buys a "AAA" game when it comes out. You assume literally everyone has every "AAA" game, and therefore they shouldn't eventually come to PS+ - a dick-brained assumption.
You're defending any criticism made against PS+, like a typical fanboy. The games lately have been inferior quality, save for a couple. The end. No one said anything about graphics vs gameplay.
If it wasn't for people like you we could still be playing online for free. Stop defending every bullshit decision a company makes just because you're a fanboy. What's even at stake for you?
If people gave a backlash for Sony introducing PS+ as mandatory for online play, maybe you wouldn't have to be paying extra money just to use your own internet. Instead everyone was busy sucking Sony's length for not screwing them over like Microsoft was trying to. This is why fanboys are a problem.
"I don't get why so many people want AAA games when they will just be games they have either played before or still own or games they have avoided because they are simply not their type of game" I wish people like you wouldn't use assumptions when trying to make a point.
Okay so you've given one example.
I LOVE PS+, but you shouldn't need it to play online. It's a bullshit move by Sony who only did it because they saw Microsuck getting away with it.
What guys? I see disagrees, but not a compelling rebuttal to my question. Standard on N4G. I love my PS4, I have PS+, but that's not the point. When everyone was busy sucking Sony off for not screwing their customers over like Microsoft were, they slipped it under the net and no one said a thing. The fact that Sony nut huggers previously brought up free online play during silly console wars makes it even more confusing.
True enough. Why was no one was pissed at Sony when they started charging for online pay? They gave into the same bullshit Microsoft pulled and sold out. PS+ is a good deal, but I shouldn't have to pay for it to play my games online. The same goes for XBL Gold. I pay to play games online already. It's called my internet bill.
They basically mean "Microsoft" exclusive. Who can blame them for putting the same game on another of their own platforms? It's not on Nintendo or Sony products, so it makes no difference to them.
And you're all giving into it.
You're basically proving you don't even watch his reviews, and can't see past your own bias.
He has all the consoles, and pretty much reviews everything fairly. There's really no room for "he's just a fanboy for X" bullshit arguments against him. He's the only I will always listen to when it comes to game reviews.
Sorry but that's a fair score and Angry Joe has a lot more credibility than most places online.
This isn't the only reason people think it's mediocre.
The fact that the guy could even do that is a sign of poor design on the the "Share Play" feature.
Yes I'm really jelly I didn't spend money on a mediocre game with nice graphics. Maybe the "hate" is because it didn't deliver on its hype, and as usual a bunch of fanboys who have buyers remorse are defending it
Well they're only "mixed" if you include the random "Who the hell are they?" website reviews. All credible sources have given it mediocre scores.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.