These screens don't do it justice, these are screen-games from a live-stream it seems. Go watch the trailer in 720p if you haven't already: http://www.youtube.com/watc... #8

Actually Mika, the Xbox One is closer spec'd to the Wii U than it is the PS4. It's REAL FLOP performance is actually 800-1000, compared to the PS4's 1.8 FLOPS.

You can't look at the raw specs of these systems.

1) 2 of the Xbox One's CPU cores are reserved to the OS.
2) 37.5% of the RAM is reserves to the OS.
3) And 10% of the GPU is reserved to the OS.

And now there's reports that Microsoft has down-clo... #3

We haven't even got our hands on it yet........... #3.2

That's why I love Kamiya lol. #7

The difference is, Naughty never went around claiming they were using a "brand new" "next-generation" engine - Activision did.

Besides, CoD is using an engine from the 1990's, Naughty's Dog engine was made in 2006. #20

But there's no reason why it shouldn't be there though.

And Kamiya did say that W101 would get a release date at the last Direct, and it did, so I think he's temporarily chillin' on his trolling lol. #2.1

People can't detect sarcasm lol. #3.1.2

Insomniac: Never developed on a Nintendo system, ever, word taken as factual.

Shin'en: Proven devs of Nintendo platforms, word is ignored or is called a lie. #4

1) Puts out late or half-assed ports.
2) Ports don't sell.
3) Dev uses poor sells as justification for not bringing future games to the platform.

^The Developer 1-2-3 Step lol.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.a... #2

Yes, I did. I finished in a little over 70 hours in a speed-run. I really didn't do any side-quests at all and did minimal gem creating.

A normal or completionist play-through should last you well over 100 hours.

It's a very epic game man, I recommend you finish it. #1.2.2

But doesn't Babidi work for Sony? #2.1

That was Shulk at the end of the trailer though, and Shulk's voice actor even said that he's working on X. To me, that's 100% confirmation that it's a Xenoblade sequel. Not to mention that the battle UI and combat looks just like it.

But other than the name, everything else sounds pretty legit. Weird......... #1

I don't agree with #1.

I generally liked All-Stars, but the one thing I didn't like most about it was the stages. A lot of the fusions didn't make sense and felt completely forced. This caused a lot of the stages to just seem completely random and silly.

"Introducing dodges and Guards would be helpful for those players"

You can already dodge and guard, don't see what the writer was saying. #2

OR, there IS a fee, it's just that you pay the fee when you buy the game at retailers:

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/r...

Basically, used games aren't going to be as cheap as they normally are. Instead of paying $30 for a used game that is $70 new, you'll be paying $55, which will cover the activation fee. #2

No games, no sales. Simple as that. #6

Researching is part of the development process. #6.1.2

All these companies start developing they're systems the very next year folks. I thought this was common knowledge lol. #6

Pretty much. It's off to a really bad start, but that doesn't mean it can't turn around. I remember when the PS3 was "doomed" until Metal Gear solid 4 came out June 14th, 2008 - almost 2 years since launch lol. #1.1

Yes it did. The system sold 3.06 million by December 31st. It was really successful at first, it wasn't until 2013 hit that the sales started slacking off. #1.4

And yet, EA has used EVERY excuse OTHER than sales to justify why they're not putting games on Nintendo platforms.
- "It's not pwerful enough."
- "We want to focus on the lower-spec'd consoles."
- "We don't want to stretch out teams too thin."
- "Frostbite 2 can't run well on it."

Not once did they say they felt that they're games couldn't sell on the Wii U.