Top

Rimfro

Member
CRank: 5Score: 0

The original isn't really that great to me. Don't get me wrong, the song itself is timeless in it's way, but I've always felt it was overhyped. Great for movie montages, but I tend to skip this one when listening. Way better Simon & Garfunkel jams out there. The Gary Jules 'Mad World" was a better cover, back in the day. The movie "Old School" will forever remind me of this song. Hahaha. The original is almost always used in comedies, as a joke, in over...

22d ago 1 agree6 disagreeView comment

If you want graphics, you play on PC, not PS4. But I'm sure you'll try to convince me that somehow your PS4's decade old gpu should be impressing me. PS4 fans bragging about performance, are like a guy bragging about being the world's tallest midget. Haha. You need some fries with all of your salt.

22d ago 14 agree5 disagreeView comment

The Vive has the superior display tech, a far better controller included, and integrated steam support built in, with Valve playing a lead role in the software development side of it.

On the other hand, you have the oculus, which immediately looks like the cheaper product just on the eye-ball test. Comes with an Xbox one controller, which most already own, and was bought out by Facebook, who has taken major control on the software development side of the Rift.

113d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

EeJLP- Um, no. Your entire argument is irrelevant. PC game developers tend to cater to the highest possible configuration, then make all of the settings scalable down from there. It doesn't take that much effort to allow your game to properly scale to the resolution of our choice. That's the beauty of PC gpus, we have options that console gamers can't even imagine. The last steam survey I did, I had three 1440 screens, and a 65" 4K connected at once. I wasn't the only one...

113d ago 3 agree8 disagreeView comment

Uh, @roadhouse, you are talking out of your rear. I have yet to run into a game that didn't run natively on my 4K screen. This isn't a console. We don't upscale unless it's by choice. It doesn't look "fake" compared to real 4K. The PC will display almost everything at the resolution you select, and it fills every pixel. Maybe I'm just in the "incredibly small" minority of gamers that cares about those things enough to have a powerful PC. And 4K is a...

113d ago 9 agree1 disagreeView comment

The console peasants are rabid this weekend. They bitch about how Tomb Raider being exclusive to the One is horrible for gaming, then whine and cry at a rumor that an exclusive of theirs hitting pc would render their console useless. Hahaha. Keep your garbage bloodborne. I played it for all of ten minutes, because I have a 4K tv, and three 1440 monitors, and the game looked and ran like garbage.

You guys can have your decade behind the times resolutions, and absolutely archai...

114d ago 2 agree6 disagreeView comment

Exactly. Game on PC.

187d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

@testfire:

You're right, resolution does matter. That's why I only game in 4K, at 60fps on PC. If resolution really mattered to you THAT much, you wouldn't be primarily gaming on consoles. That's what's hilarious about all of these "console war" comments. ALL OF YOU are taking MAJOR graphical/resolution downgrades by gaming on consoles in the first place. You guys are arguing over 180 lines of resolution. Hahahaha. It's like claiming to be th...

187d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

The average low-end PC user is running 1080p. The PCs rating lower than that aren't meant to be gamed on. You literally need nothing to start a steam account on your pc. Spin won't give your PS4 100% destructible environments. Just kidding. I love my PS4 brothers. ;)

267d ago 6 agree6 disagreeView comment

Don't sweat the fanboys putting words into your mouth. They are all busy trying to cope with the fact that the cloudz wasn't just a myth, and that the secret sauce was VERY REAL.

1440p is quickly becoming the new 1080p, on PC. Not to mention gsync, and 144hz/fps. Even the average low-end pc user is achieving 1080p. Meanwhile...HAHAHAHA

267d ago 6 agree12 disagreeView comment

@moldybread: I love how you try to paint Xbox users as potentially xenophobic. Haha. It's really sad that console fans have stooped to the point of painting supporters of another platform as prejudiced towards other nations, only because they support a different console than you.

It's as bad as blind-followers of political ideology. You can't actually defend or refute another's position, so you just accuse them of something really bad, only to put them on the...

312d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Meh. It's not that bad. Most titles I play, I'm playing at 1440p/144fps. Some multiplats are like this, unfortunately, but this is usually not an issue. But when you look at all of the ground-breaking gaming experiences, and the way pc games are showcasing new sides to gaming, and telling new stories not ever confronted by games, I'll live. I've always felt like the Batman games have been a bit overrated lately.

315d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's not hard to run games well on the pc anymore. Mid-level hardware is achieving performance and fluidity, vastly superior to consoles, for just a couple of hundred dollars more.

Console gamers have been playing the same games for several generations. The only upgrades to console gaming has been slightly improved graphics. Still use the same control input. Still use tvs that intoduce hug amounts of input lag. Still struggle to stay hd at fps over 30. Consoles are actual...

315d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

The gap between consoles and pcs isn't closing, it's widening at an alarming rate. HD became the norm around the launch of the 360. Resolution, and frame rate has barely moved forward in an entire generation.

The majority of games on consoles, are still struggling to hit that 1080p/fps "sweetspot for gaming", and 30fps is still the norm. And many titles are still sub hd, trying to squeeze frames out.

On PC, 1440p/144fps is the standard now....

315d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Console gamers will never understand the level of control that is afforded by sub 1ms response, and 144hz refresh rate. Gaming comes down to playability and control. PC gaming slays consoles in that right, and we aren't even discussing hardware, input methods, or graphics. Just the ability to display a faster image. I can go on...

315d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

I don't see how it's a good point. They literally are just flipping a switch, and leaving it up to developers to activate. I doubt it took vast resources, or focus to make this feature possible. SMH. Xbox is like LeBron James. It doesn't matter how much they do right, the brand will always be held to a different standard than other systems, and I have no clue why.

Sony gets a pass on their terrible network. Stripping features, charging for BC, "winning"...

322d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

He's right. More options, custom mapping. Ps4 controller, xbox one controller, steam controller, motion controls, tons of mouse and kb options. Not to mention framerate. You can prefer a console or controller all you want, but you'll get crushed by m/kb because it is quantifiably superior.

322d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Unfortunately, you won't hear a counterpoint. Just phantom disagrees from the casual console crowd. I've bought 35 games for $80 during the steam sale. I'd say like 20 of them are AAA titles too.

325d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

So much hate. Who cares? The only ones hyping VR are the Sony fans. If you want true VR, you'll be gaming on PC. #tistrue

327d ago 4 agree7 disagreeView comment

It's like a compilation of everything awful about the 90's. It's only missing a rollerblader, or a wolf head. #bruh

337d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment