I appreciate your bluntness, but there's more on the system than that. That's some big generalization you've made. Plus, it's not like each Mario and "Donkey long" game is the exact same or very similar to one another. (Though the NSMB series falls in that category!)
An article of this type by a writer who has a history of these clickbait titles, writing something that a GameFAQs member could have come up with.
We've included many of those in past installments. Didn't get around to Soul Sacrifice Delta, Hyperdimension Neptunia Re:Birth, among others yet, though.
So awesome. :)
No, a stupid click bait title would be "Nintendo: The Company Currently Playing It Too Safe With Their Software and Why They Are Doomed to Extinction Because of It." Unfortunately, that wouldn't fit what this article is about. How about instead of being rude because you're hiding safely behind your computer screen and can get away with it, why don't you actually read the article next time? Then you wouldn't make a comment whining about an article tit...
Did you think the "O" was a "U"? :)
I just think it's fun to ponder such things, what the PS4 and Sony did right, and use rookie analysis. I'm weird that way, though! heh
"Will be gaming's best year" Where have I heard this before? Every year.
Of those I have Mario Party 3 and Bomberman 64: The Second Attack (which was different to B64 as it didn't have anywhere near as many obnoxious bomb jumping puzzles as well as a bigger focus on story and exploration). I really want Conker, but that game's out of my price range.
I'm personally tired of the Kitase's fascination with Lightning and wanting her to slam her down every gamer's throat.
So... game characters that are beloved and star in games that are still of the utmost quality (let's pick Mario and Luigi for now) should be killed and have no more games released for them because the author is tired of them? Yeah, that's not selfish and entitled at all. Saw the word "rehash" a lot. Did you go to the University of GameFAQs, too?
Speak for yourself, Mr. Hyde.
That was the tipping point at least. I've seen the argument go around at many other venues, N4G included. EDIT: It was the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back (i.e. it was the same old argument I've seen elsewhere but this time on a new site boiling down to "Wii didn't win because reasons." I felt the need to write about it. EDIT 2: It's very easy to see who has actually read the article before commenting. Those of you ...
Totally agreed! One would have thought it dropped support to work on Wii U games, but then the Wii U launched with missing promised titles that were delayed a year. I don't get Nintendo sometimes.
Hey NYC_Gamer. The PS2 also had much more third-party support, so that's a very good reason why.
The PS2, NES, SNES, and every other leading system received tons of shovelware. Perhaps those systems weren't wins for gamers, either, by your logic?
Actually, if you read the article, the attach rate for the Wii rivaled, but was lower than the 360 and PS3. Software sold rather well on the Wii, many of which, of course, being Nintendo's own titles. You don't sell over 20 million copies of Mario Kart Wii from people who have put their systems in a closet.
I'm confused. This is the fourth Mario & Sonic game.
Total ripoff of Madden NFL '99.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.