I'm in chapter 10, something tells me that's not a person I should be reading about just yet.....
You're in the wrong thread then.
Holy gawd, the negativity around this place lately.
At the auction, couple ladies drinking champagne actually had some in their glasses; it'd move around as their glasses tilted, nearly spilling. Saw it after zooming in by accident.
Been almost 5 years since the last one. I actually find UC4 refreshing after going so long playing everything BUT Uncharted.
Played it for a couple hours with a friend and didn't care for it in the least. Hey, it happens
No way it's a 10 with that MP. Tried a couple of the user map missions too and wasn't compelled to keep playing.
Interesting, but GT's competition buying the name and video library isnt quite the revival I think most fans were hoping for. It's like when WWF bought WCW. Wound up being WCW in-name-only. They buried it, creatively.
Most of those GT guys reformed as EasyAllies I believe. Need them back to make it truly mean something. Not much faith in an IGN "raw/smackdown" brand extension. In the end it's still IGN.
Are they still releasing that Sly Cooper animated movie? I remember the first trailer and then all the attention moved to Ratchet.
If they are still making a Sly movie, I'm hopeful a game would follow.
What ever happened to the little guy from Knack that they made an announce trailer for, saying knack was coming to ps all stars? Wonder if they just decided to hold off until a sequel?
Agreed. Guy who wrote this: you already wrote this. Drop your cards on the table and walk away. If your hand is weak, fold. 10 addendums (and counting) in the comment section isn't strengthening your position, merely weakening it.
Edit: dbl post
I don't have a problem with naughty dog stealth. Never did. TLOU was the best survival horror/stealth hybrid i've played in ages. Sorry pixelgate.
Troy can do whatever he wants. Everyone else does.
For one, lets not confuse "honest review score" with "blatantly transparent trolling".
Oh, too late.
I guess saying the game aspires to be a toilet is now professional? SJW that.
Well, this is a video game site. People don't generally come here to talk about who St Louis will play in the next round, or Game of Thrones.
*insert's Tyrion's speech from GOT this past Sunday about the lost art of conversation* :p
Looking in their comment section, the Post literally has another staff member of theirs vehemently disagreeing with this guy's article, but in a serious way and not satirical. Starting to think this guy is a legitimate troll that meta just irresponsibly gave the keys to the castle, and that the score will stand.
Sets a bad precedent. Meta can just make up their own score to anybody's scoreless "graphics are too good, too much detail I don't know where to...
Is this a mistake on metacritic's part or some blatant trolling? Reason I ask, is the washington post already posted their review yesterday, 4/4 which is 100%. It's a legit review by a Lou Kesten using the posts usual scoring system. I'd post the link but im on my phone.
The, I don't know what you call it, article with no score and no actual review of the game listed under "comic riffs" shouldn't be on metacritic when an actual 4/4 review under...
There's literally a trophy for doing a speed run in 6hrs or so. How in the...how is that a "little too long"?!
They brought the confusion on themselves by posting an incomplete review with an "in progress" score that they said wasn't final.
To me, it always felt like an opportunistic publicity stunt to stay in the headlines long after everyone else.