And not only that, you gain 20% performance, due to less pixels.
My point is clear, even when old consoles had 80 mils, there was not even a single game that would sold half the user base, so the user base, on consoles, pc etc. don't mean anything, ps4 has now 40 mils, and what, will uncharted 4 sell like 30 mils?
PS3 and x360 had both 80 mil sold and even the highest praised exclusives were not selling 10 mils.
Also the pc game market is much bigger, so people playing everything, even browser games, that have more players than any AAA games.
Look at android, most top popular games have more than 100 mln players.
Exactly, this is the reason EA Access was denied by sony on ps4.
Yeah, just like those 3d tvs, we all know how it ended.
It is not failed, it is great cross over.
Give it a break, people are buying 21:9 screens "just to not see the black bars", man, this is pure BS as any 16:9 tv can display 21:9 and in my country, largest 21:9 display is 35 inch and that mean that a 16:9 tv has bigger 21:9 screen http://displaywars.com/42-i... And you gain wide view, much better than 16:9.
Won't work for xone, too weak, but the same tech is on PC and the problem is it could but is still using this 720 reconstruction BS, even in 1080, you need 2k or 4k to really up the graphics.
They really should make games 21:9 (ultra wide) on xone. (and to be honest on ps4 too, it is just better, order 1886 is native 21:9) Not only it lowers res from 1920x1080 to 1920x822, so you gain performance, 24% less to render. But you also don't loose quality, it just changes the aspect ratio, so pixel density is the same, yet you gain ultra wide game view and it is just better than standard 16:9, just compare on google the division 21:9 vs 16:9.
Hah so the disagrees means the wife is not wise.
It NEEDS WINDOWS 7 SUPPORT, what were they thinking, most people still using win7?
So you didn't pay for ps+ and you think the dev gave it for free? Oh boy...
Your wife is a very wise women then. (ha ha now try to disagree or agree, lets play a game...)
LOL WAT?! You can simply do 8.1, 8.9, no need for up to 100, it is the same as 10. But it should not be 10, just 5, like in school. 7/10 looks good, but it really is 3.5/5, not so good anymore, right?
Average of what, good ratings? No, you clearly didn't have math or paying much attention to it. But ok, average should be 6/10, 5/10 is below average, but 7/8 is good.
"roughly between 75-86. Not bad scores at all mind you, just average. " WAT? 50 is average, 75-86 is good - very good.
DARKKENT If you expectation was judging a game by metacritic then ok. But metacritic has nothing to do with being some kind of game quality guidance for sure.
Now that's a surprise, lol...
And how many pc's are there with the power of ps4? Sure as hell more than ps4s players base, and psvr is not oculus. And on PC you can even lower settings more than on ps4, so again, more people can play.
Bathyj This is BS man, they all have 3 subpixels, you cant make all colors without 3 subpixels YOU CAN'T. PERIOD. You need red green blue to make any color. BUT, they have different layout of subpixels, in oculus or vive they have pentile screen, it just shares one subpixel per group, so a special algorithm is converting between rgb color data and pentile perceived colors, there need to be correction. Thus making RGB display superior, bu...
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.