N2NOther (User)

  • Contributor
  • 5 bubbles
  • 9 in CRank
  • Score: 42570
""

Comments

Man, they need to make these things available for consoles. That was amazing. #6
2272d ago by N2NOther | View comment
Yes, the game developer should be responsible for the mental stability, rationale and morals of everyone who plays their games. This has to be the stupidest statement anyone has ever made. #15
2272d ago by N2NOther | View comment
If you were smart you wouldn't be traveling in packs of three...One well placed nade or a quick blast from an M60 and you've just given the other team a UAV. And it's not to get kills in HQ, it's to prevent the other team from securing it. Which is the object. What are they supposed to use? Harsh language? Me? I'm a fan of readying a stun grenade and running into the enemy. Once I die I drop the stun and then my martyrdom. Comedy ensues. #8.2
2273d ago by N2NOther | View comment
Usually I don't feel like ratings make the movie but turning an hard M rated game into a PG-13 movie is a terrible idea. #16
2273d ago by N2NOther | View comment
Gamestop is a business and it's easy to hate a business who makes money.

There is NO WAY the industry will force Gamestop to sell games at a lower price. Why? Because Gamestop is the number one video game retailer in the world. They make tons of money for these companies. It becomes a matter of the lesser of two evils.

Great games sell well. Sometimes great games don't, but that's because something about the game didn't or doesn't appeal to everyone it should. Like s... #8
2273d ago by N2NOther | View comment
Ok, so, again, why the disagrees? Are you disagreeing that I'm going to buy it for the 360 and that I only by exclusives for the PS3? Because that's pretty much impossible to disagree with. #64.1
2273d ago by N2NOther | View comment
No, we should be rewarded with kills for exploiting stupidity. #11.1
2273d ago by N2NOther | View comment
My question is how many "real people" have you seen die? How much combat have you seen? Then again, how much combat have you seen where you die and respawn, or when when you rack up kills get the ability to call in air strikes and helicopters? Or hear from avoiding getting shot it, or shoot a rocket at a bus and it doesn't blow up? Or can get shot but if you run up you can slice the guy's arm and instantly kill him, and then you just hang back and heal.

Seriously, again... #10.3
2273d ago by N2NOther | View comment
Why do people continuously cry about Martyrdom? I don't play hardcore because every time I have it's a camper's heaven, so I don't really care about team kills...But this "it takes no skill" nonsense is beyond retarded. The ONLY time I die from it is when I run into someone else's kill or am trapped in a corner with it. Which is rare since I rarely find myself in a corner. If you die from martyrdom you have to be either stupid enough to not wait a few seconds before rushing in or ar... #8
2274d ago by N2NOther | View comment
Why does anyone even care what lead platform it's being designed on? I'm getting it for the 360 like I do every cross platform game. I only get PS3 exclusives for the PS3. #64
2274d ago by N2NOther | View comment
This is easily the game I'm looking most forward to. #16
2274d ago by N2NOther | View comment
They do have special licenses to say used games. #31.1
2274d ago by N2NOther | View comment
Tell you what...Stop making games that last 8 hours and have zero replay value and I'll stop buying used games. Very rarely do I buy single player games that I know I'll beat in a few plays. That's when I buy it used so I can not only save a lot of money (on average about $10 or more than a new game) but I can return it in 7 days. If not I can trade it in and have only payed about $20 for the game.

And all you that criticize the workers at Gamestop, yes, they're doing they're jo... #35
2274d ago by N2NOther | View comment
COD 3 is a solid game with exceptional multi-player. The problem I have with this article, and the thought process in general, is the "why is it WW2 after we had Modern Warfare...it's Treyarch's fault". Treyarch has been working on this game since they finished COD 3. 2 years ago. By the time COD 4 was revealed to be modern, they already had about 9 months of development in place. Development for a WW 2 game. This cost them 9 months worth of their budget. What were they supposed to... #13
2275d ago by N2NOther | View comment
Really? Because COD 4 is usually sold out, while Halo 3 has tons of used copies available. #7.5
2277d ago by N2NOther | View comment
So you're saying you have no skill? I mean, if it takes no skill to get kills in that game, and that's how "well" you do....You can average that many kills, cool, but how many times did you die? 35-10 is good...35-30, not so much. #9.5
2277d ago by N2NOther | View comment
It takes no skill, huh? Then how come there are people that are terrible at the game? Which I'm guessing you were one of them. #9.3
2277d ago by N2NOther | View comment
Kind of like Halo 2 being forgotten when Halo 3 came out? Sure you still have people that play Halo 2, but not nearly as many as Halo 3.

COD 4 will continue to be played until Call of Duty 5. No, World at War is NOT Call of Duty 5. #7.3
2277d ago by N2NOther | View comment
I prefer COD 4to Halo any day of the week but COD 4 doesn't have much to offer once you've ranked up as high as you can go. Only 2 of the new maps are any good, and with so few coming out, they've wasted too much time between updates...What's next? a few new playlists? Why not create a new game mode, more maps and such? I only play COD 4 when my friends are on since I can't stand playing with people I don't know, and I imagine it's gotten that way for a lot of people. Unfortunately there are... #8
2278d ago by N2NOther | View comment
Please tell me, in the history of gaming, where a console manufacturer has bought a publisher and it's studios and allowed the games to go cross platform? #1.14
2278d ago by N2NOther | View comment
1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 ... 76
Showing: 1221 - 1240 of 1501