I'm not a journalist. I'm simply a guy who critiques and comments on games and their surrounding culture.
With the exception the the bird dude, whose name I forget, the enemies you fight are all variations of the same ones you've encountered by halfway through the game. The only thing that changes is their elemental damage, if that.
I appreciate the comments but I have to ask, did anyone read the article? Because I would curious as to what people think about my complaints?
Not from where I'm sitting. That said, did you read the article? Is there anything I said that you disagree with?
I ageee and in many aspects, as I addresssed in the article, Nioh does just that. However, these two areas - enemy variety and a larger, interconnected or even more interesting world would have done nothing but add to the experience.
As I say in the review, it has flaws but it's something special.
It's worth $60. :)
This is exactly right. I don't give 10s often but I did give a 10 for this review because that's how I measure the amount of fun I've had with the game.
I actually do like Romancing the Stone. Quite a bit, actually.
Thank you! Very much appreciated.
Thanks for reading and commenting. I don't disagree with your points but as I stated in the review, I care that Nate cared about Sam, but I never did, unfortunately.
Also, I should note that I never liked the Goonies and I saw it when it first hand out in theaters. ;)
Thanks! I take it you read the article?
Ugh. Another day, another "Shame on you for not being politically correct" article.
It's not censorship but there is still a disturbing amount of pressure being place on devs to not make the game they want in fear of offending people. It's obnoxious.
Hi, thanks for reading. Did you read the whole thing or just look at the list? I explained in the beginning how the list was comprised. No one had a Nintendo game high enough on their list. Also, a list of our favorite games isn't journalism. At all.
There are 3,477,829,638 males in the world. Define "most."
No one is wrong for saying something is "good enough" if they genuinely feel it's good enough for them. I was NEVER expecting great graphics. I am expecting them to be using that power in the scope of the game, the ambition in the mechanics, behind the scenes stuff we don't think about. I will take "sub-par" graphics over load screens. If they can make it a seamless world where I don't see a load screen for every new area I enter, that's WA...
I'm a convert.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.