I agree, massive maps don't always mean interesting ones, I played Ghost Recon Wildlands, and while the game is fun exploring its massive world became boring quite fast because of how empty and bland it is.
she posted on her Twitter "sorry guys i swear it's not DA related post I am very sorry"
hahaha you need to relax, this is the Internet of cousre you will find bad grammar
I am having mild amount of fun, I enjoy the different environments, they are beautiful. But I can't see myself playing it for weeks or months like Fallout 4, GTAV, etc.
GTA V was amazing but the world map also had vast areas that were empty with not much to do. when you make a huge map it's inevitable that there will be lots of landmass with nothing interesting on it, Skyrim, Witcher 3 etc. I think that's one thing Fallout 4 did well, the map was smaller than other open world games but also denser, you didn't travel long distances without stumbling across something .
If you wait a bit longer you might find a copy for $1 I am sure!
graphics and music are less important than gameplay/battles and story/characters for me personally.
While I enjoyed Nights of Azure, there was no way for me to play this game in January or February or March, too many other games will take priority, especially Horizon Zero Dawn and Mass Effect Andromeda, I will be sinking all my free times into playing these two game for quite a while.
There is nothing evolved about FF15. it has some western-style rpgs elements like open-world and tons of (fetch) side quests but lacks the coherent plot and world-building that previous FFs had. it's not a bad game but not great either, it feels incomplete in many ways and lacks identity. Hopefully Square Enix learns from it and next installment is better.
while I don't regret buying or playing this, it does not live up to the standard of Telltale's other works, like TWD and Borderlands.
no reason to resort to insults now. AAA games usually get 9s and 10s, so 8 for FF game that has been in development for a decade, is low in my opinion. If you think 8 is not 'low' by any means, than you think 7 would have been good? 6? 5 is low then? please elaborate what you consider is low for this game.
surprisingly low score
RE4 has been re-released so many times I can't see how anyone can say it's under appreciated.
My ass tells me it's a Nintendo system, therefore it's low end. Just logic.
There is nothing groundbreaking about it technologically, it's a low end tablet.
N4G get you s**** together
witcher 3 had huge areas that also were barren.
amazing battles system in Grandia III, one of the best IMO.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.