moparful99 (User)

  • Trainee
  • 5 bubbles
  • 5 in CRank
  • Score: 54930
"Gamer status"


297d ago by moparful99 | View comment | Immature
Please re read the email.. The developers and publishers dictate pricing not SONY! Thats what is aggravating me, everyone is blaming Sony and its the publishers doing. #5.2.2
297d ago by moparful99 | View comment
Sony doesn't set the prices, the publishers do.. #4.1
297d ago by moparful99 | View comment
I completely disagree with you. When you look at someone's gamerscore it really doesn't tell you much.

Also 100 percenting a game on the gamerscore system doesn't reward you with anything signifying that achievement. With the trophy system you can easily see at a glance what level someone is at.

When you look at someones gamer card on PSN it shows you how many bronze, silver, gold, and platinum trophies they have. Gold and especially platinum tr... #1.5.1
324d ago by moparful99 | View comment
@JCNBA Did I say anything about Tomb Raider? Nope. I was arguing for TLOU remake seeing as I think its a good idea.. I have no problem with the Tomb Raider remake or any other remake for that matter.. I have no idea why you make it seem like I'm defending the Last of Us and nothing else... #4.1.2
324d ago by moparful99 | View comment
I know what you meant. But You can't have the "digital benefits" while buying physical discs without giving up basic rights. That 24 hour check in nonsense was beyond reasonable, on top of that a game could only be lent, sold or traded to another individual once. After that it had to be taken to select retailers where it could be traded or sold to them. I personally to buy or sell used games but I have a lot of friends and family that we like to borrow each others games, more th... #30.1.3
324d ago by moparful99 | View comment
You're right there could be 10's of thousands, however it doesn't change the fact that less than 1% of people the people that played that game achieved what you did.. It would still be nice to know exact figures.. #1.1.1
325d ago by moparful99 | View comment
Do they matter? Matter is a relative term. Do trophies and achievement enhance your enjoyment/ percieved value of a game? If yes then they matter.

I know for me they give me a sense of accomplishment. When I meet someone new I see how my trophy score stacks up. With the advent of the rarity system that Sony implemented with trophies it adds another level of accomplishement. Getting a trophy that less than 1% of the gaming community has is a rewarding feeling. #1
325d ago by moparful99 | View comment
Except it's not $60 and has all the DLC. Your logic is belong to me. #14.1
325d ago by moparful99 | View comment
That's what gets me about the argument against remakes. If they weren't desirable people wouldn't buy them and publishers wouldn't make them. How on earth can someone argue against something that is clearly desired by enough gamers to warrant the practice. I love remakes for the most part. The God of War saga remains my favorite. Experiencing the entire God of War franchise on my PS3 on one disc was sublime.

Despite my dislike of Halo I can easily see why so... #13.1
325d ago by moparful99 | View comment
@Gamer666 Playstation Now says "HI" #7.2
325d ago by moparful99 | View comment
the Last of Us remake is tantamount to a "Game of the Year" edition but is being released on the PS4 instead of the PS3.

It's not like they are just marginally improving the graphics and calling it a day. They added a lot of value in the form of all the DLC, is cheaper, is an incentive for PS3 owners to upgrade to a PS4, as well as bolstering the PS4's catalogue...

You see it as a superfluous cash grab but the community sees it as an easy... #4.1
325d ago by moparful99 | View comment
If the concept of a "superior indie platform is not important" then why are they strictly releasing on Xbox platforms?

If they wish to release only on Xbox thats their right but to act as though console exclusivity isn't important while remaining exclusive is kind of a contradiction.. #3
325d ago by moparful99 | View comment
I'm sorry but the defense for Microsofts proposed DRM is illogical. If you want the ability to never have to swap discs ever again just buy digital games.

If Microsoft truly wanted to give us this "freedom" and the decision wasn't a profit driven one designed to snuff out used game sales then they would have lowered the price of digital games. Period.

Its obvious and apparent that the motivation behind their DRM policies was strictly profit... #30.1.1
325d ago by moparful99 | View comment
So your entire argument is founded on the fact that Sony sold memory cards separate? Why is this a bad thing? Nintendo used them with the N64, Sony used them with the PS1 and PS2. Save files were KB's in size and didnt' require expensive hard drives. With the advent of HD consoles and game installs suddenly hard drives were needed.

Also lest you forget that Sony designed the ability to swap in ANY 2.5" sata hard drive. They didn't force you to buy a proprieta... #28.3
325d ago by moparful99 | View comment
Judging by your immature response i'm guessing 12? Seriously I'm almost 30 and have been gaming since the age of 4. I'm well aware of Sony's history and more than qualified to comment on it. I've owned countless playstation products from the original all the way to my PS4. Sony earns my continued support because of their connection with their audience, they just "get it"...

For whatever inexplicable reason you have this disdain for them and it c... #28.2
326d ago by moparful99 | View comment
You based this absurd comment off of? Sony has alwasy been a great steward to our industry and us the consumer. Even when they destroyed the competition with the PS2 they continued to develop new IP's, technologies, and remained an approachable company. Microsoft is the company that has wrought our industry with terrible practices like buying dlc, nickel and diming for features that should be included or free, and in general treating their customers as though they know whats best for them... #28.1
326d ago by moparful99 | View comment
PS3 was imferior to the 360? Are you kidding me? The cell procesdor was way beyond the cpu inside the 360 and PS3's exclusives proved this very point. The ps3 was also superior in regards to upgradeable hard drives standard. Built in hdmi standard. Superior multimedia options including full hd 7.1 surtound sound support. Blu ray standard. Free psn access and multiplayer. Etc.. The xbox 1 on the other hand is known to be slightly weaker than the PS4 and forced kinect which decreased alrea... #1.8.4
329d ago by moparful99 | View comment
The saddest part about your entire statement besides the very weak argument against Sony is that you actually seem to believe what you are saying to be true..

Forget the fact that Microsoft created a mockery of gaming with the 360. Knowingly sold the most unreliable electronic device in history. How many people bought multiple consoles? Talk about rewarding terrible behavior..charging you for add ons like wifi, proprietary hard drives, and buying a premium console just to ge... #26.1
330d ago by moparful99 | View comment
One of those indie developers could become the "next big studio" companys like naughty dog and ready at dawn weren't automatic AAA studios. They worked their way up and giving these indie studios a spotlight will only strengthen Sony's already world class portfolio of studios. Look at Hello Games with No man's sky, they look poised to make the leap to AAA and they're on board with Sony...

Just sit back and relax, 2 or 3 years from now the flood of f... #16.1.1
330d ago by moparful99 | View comment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 149
Showing: 1 - 20 of 2962