Classic! I don't know about you, but that Apple doesn't look like that on my TV. :S
"LOT Bioshock 2 verdict - Really bad screentearing on ps3." Really, bend the truth much? That was never said in the article. Let me quote it for you since you can't seem to read: "Thankfully, neither system performed terribly, but the PlayStation 3 performed slightly better than the Xbox 360. Since the frame rates were so close, this decision was made based mostly on screen tearing. The screen tearing on the Xbox 360 was worse, and was especially not...
Good comparison! I am glad to see that the two versions look so close. Still wonder what is going on with the vegetation on the Xbox 360...what a mess.
Great game! But I have to admit that the multiplayer was less than amazing. They would have been better off just leaving it out.
How do you figure?
Actually, you are wrong. All of their Head2Head's are offered as early access to their members and then the post goes public. Someone on N4G jumped the gun and posted it during that time period.
Nope, no registration needed.
Wow! Visceral Games did a phenomenal job porting this game to the PlayStation 3! This is how all ports should be handled.
Yeah, other sites that perform analysis' has confirmed that the PS3 and the Xbox 360 both tear. So gone are your conspiracy theories about them "twisting" the facts. PS3: http://zoome.jp/ps360/diary... 360: http://zoome.jp/ps360/diary... Truth sucks huh?
Luckily they don't zoom in 300%. The images you see are crops of the 1280x720 captures. What is funny is that you didn't even notice how they gave the PS3 the performance win. It amazes me how people can't understand a scoring system...
Try viewing the website on your TV through the PS3 web browser. I am sure you will be shocked to see it looks the exact same as what you have been playing all along. You simply cannot be sure that what you see on your monitor is what you will see on your tv. Unless of course they are one in the same.
You are right, they are close visually. But there are a few glaring blemishes on the PS3 version, most notably the water effects.
If it weren't from the long load times on the PS3 it would have caused a tie. It really is unacceptable to have a 4gb install and still have longer loading times. That is almost half the size of the game!
Wow, the PlayStation 3 environment reflections look pretty bad.
As mentioned on a previous page: Remember, what you see on your monitor WILL be different than what you see on your TV. If you want to really see how accurate these images are, load the site up on your PS3 Web Browser. LoT (like DF) capture straight from the consoles, so the images you see are unaltered. Any variations are from TV/Monitor settings.
Remember, what you see on your monitor WILL be different than what you see on your TV. If you want to really see how accurate these images are, load the site up on your PS3 Web Browser. LoT (like DF) capture straight from the consoles, so the images you see are unaltered. Any variations are from TV/Monitor settings.
I have to agree. It all depends on how well the single player campaigns are.
I agree, I would have loved to play this game on my PS2. Hopefully they will port the PSP game to the PS2. I mean they have done it for many games and Kingdom Hearts is to big of a franchise to miss this treatment.
any proof to backup such a bold statement?
I have to agree. BioWare did a great job on the first game and improved on the formula in every way for Mass Effect 2. I am really digging the more action oriented gameplay.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.