CRank: 25Score: 0

I took these tests for GamerDNA a while ago :p

2162d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nah, not too late. It's a nice setting too (ancient Rome).

2162d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Seriously, Australia is a major mistake. Sony should have done a little research before choosing an exclusive provider there.

2162d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

You can use the skins for New Game Plus.

2199d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Because it's extra.

2201d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Guess what killed the PSP Go?

2208d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah, Standard and Poor's are big Microsoft fanboys for dropping Sony's credit rating due to four straight fiscal year losses. ;)

2228d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

500K retail sales are amazing for PC, but according to EA, a ton more bought BF3 via Origin.

2234d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not vgchartz's fault. Companies don't release digital sales figures unless it's good news.

2235d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Those 500,000 sales of BF3 on PC only represent RETAIL sales. It doesn't count digital sales.

2235d ago 7 agree3 disagreeView comment

LOL Preordering started in 2005? Are you serious?

Civ 2 was released in 1994 and was impossible to get without preordering.

2242d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

How old are you, GamersRulz? Preorders have been huge since 1995. Try finding a copy of Civ 2 if you didn't preorder.

2242d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's being lead developed on the PC. The reason there is a 360 version is that it's an easy DirectX port.

2270d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I liked the BattleTech RTS, too.

2270d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sorry, it's Origin.

2277d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wanna read the PDF again? It says that if you have a beef with Sony, you can ONLY deal with them out of court if you agree to the Terms of Service.

"By accepting this Agreement, you agree to its terms and to abide by SNEA’sSNEI’s Sony Online
Services policies" and by that, you're sent to section 15 where it says that by agreeing to the TOS, you're bound to arbitration with Sony.

2285d ago 4 agree14 disagreeView comment

"B) It's highly unlikely someone that is suing Sony actually believes their information is still secure."

They may think it's secure NOW, but want damages for their mistake. It happens all. the. time.

2285d ago 3 agree16 disagreeView comment

Because you own a PS3 and want to play online, buy content, etc?

And if you believe Sony correctly fixed all of the security issues, why wouldn't you continue using PSN?

2285d ago 7 agree26 disagreeView comment

For all of Sony's claims to being apologetic and claiming they were truly remorseful over letting all of their users personal info and in many cases credit and debit card info get stolen over a security system that they were told was vulnerable, telling PSN users that they can't sue them or else they're booted from PSN is... not exactly showing remorse.

2285d ago 16 agree33 disagreeView comment

You'd be right, except you're wrong. This is not "old news from July". The press conference happened on September 3, 2011. Thanks for asking.

2295d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment