jeeves86 (User)

  • Contributor
  • 5 bubbles
  • 8 in CRank
  • Score: 40640


Some people just don't dig weed. Everybody knows someone who suffers from some debilitating illness whose life was completely turned around once they started smoking and if it helps them, that's great.

Other people like to live their lives without it. No big deal. #5.1.1
377d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
Wow, look at all the people that don't get it. Must be the font. #1.2.4
377d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
I'd have to disagree. There are people out there who absolutely 'have' to have it first, regardless of what it costs.

This is particularly true at Christmas with parents who are desperately searching for that one thing that their kid 'must have.' #1.2.1
381d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
I would hardly call RedEye a news program. They're a satirical late-night show, they even acknowledge it when they get themselves wrangled up in controversy.

These guys were pretty nasty about the Canadian military a few years ago, three days after four Canadians died fighting for US interests in Afghanistan. It was in particular poor taste due to the fact that four deaths in one attack just doesn't happen all that often. They said a bunch of other stupid and inse... #1.1
384d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
That's kind of a spoiler image there, Mezzo. Think you could have grabbed a different one? #1
391d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
I like the game, I like the game a lot, but I can still acknowledge problems with it. The game was gorgeous, the score amazing and it was pretty challenging, but I found a few glitches, a few draw-distance issues (which admittedly weren't that far away), and a few nitpicks with the story. The blood hilariously squirts out of people like strawberry jam and then just pools around outside of them in a perfect circle.

My main complaint with the game is the character develop... #16
391d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
That's not exactly how reviews work... #4.2
391d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
@ slinky - that's...incorrect.

Read the article and the tumblr page, not just the title and not just the comments. You will find all the 'correct' information.

Additionally, you're wrong about photographers too. #8.1.2
392d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
It would be different if he were at least credited for the map, but he wasn't. #9.2
392d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
He didn't "steal" anything. #1.1.2
392d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
@ Mr. Nuts - You're STILL upset about L4D2? The game has been available on Steam for about $5 on multiple occasions, and it pretty much includes L4D1 in its entirety. It'd be unlikely that any of the previous characters would make a re-appearance.

L4D2 is like the Saints Row 2 of open-world crime sims. Not completely off the wall insane, but still fun because it doesn't take itself too seriously. There are enough gritty zombie games out there to last a lifetime. #1.1.3
400d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
The issue here, judging by many, many comments is that the review was too opinionated. Which shows that they don't understand what exactly a review is.

Have any proof that he really just doesn't like violence or gore? Then maybe Polygon got the wrong person to review their game. Get this guy to keep on reviewing Fisher Price toys. #24.2.1
405d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
That sounds like a ridiculous rating system. But it certainly reflects what the author writes in the review over just doling out a number. #9.1
405d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
@ Winter47th

Reviews ARE opinions. It is the opinion of the reviewer who is reviewing the game whether the game is good or bad. There are no objective qualifiers that make a game good or bad, it's all about personal opinion.

There is a serious difference in a blatantly slanted review, bashed or praised heavily for minutiae reasons, as the Polygon review appears to be. However, you can't have a review without an opinion.... #1.1.7
405d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
@ SeanScythe

The fact that so many people agreed with your second comment makes me weep for humanity.

BTW, a feminist is anyone who calls for equal rights for women and depictions of women in the media.

So there you go. #1.1.3
407d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
I could see how it could be turned into a rape joke, but you have to be reaching pretty far for that.

It's only good PR to apologize for something that could be considered offensive. No offense was intended, but it happened regardless. #17
407d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
It'd have to be in development first for them to announce it at E3. #21
411d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
Hence the word "exclusive."

There are a lot of games for the PC. Ask anyone who's ever looked through the Steam catalogue #4.2
415d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
I'm sorry. That is the worst excuse ever...You won't let your friends borrow your games? Cause "support the devs?" Your friend borrowing a game could lead them to buy the game for themselves later on down the line, or buy new when the next game from said developer is finished and hits retail.

Everyone should be allowed to buy used and not be guilted into the 'you're destroying the industry' rhetoric.

The 'used vs. new'... #1.2.3
416d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
I was being sarcastic. The man made a broad generalization of a group of people who, let's face it, many of them do fit that description, like it or not.

Just because you don't fit the mold, doesn't negate the fact that there are many people out there that do, perpetuating that generalization.

That's what I was getting at. #21.1.2
416d ago by jeeves86 | View comment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 56
Showing: 61 - 80 of 1104