You can't argue with stupid people, but you can certainly play with them.


CRank: 5Score: 0

Re-skin? It's brand new game, with entirely new features. Sure the game play is similar, and do you why? Because a battlefield game is supposed to play like a battlefield game; just like a cod game is supposed to play like a cod game, and an uncharted game is supposed to play like an uncharted game and.... well, you get the point.

311d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well no s**t it plays like a battlefield game. What else is it supposed to feel like? The point of going back to WW1 was to give people a fresh, new setting. Other wise, who heck is wants to play pure trench warfare? This is GREAT news for battlefield players.

311d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Oh gawd, I hope it has nothing to do with the year 21-- something. But i'm sure it wont, not with Titanfall 2 on it's way.

356d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Personally I don't think it's battlefield-like enough. DICE was aiming for a game that could easily be picked up by any gamer, and based on the beta, I think they achieved that goal.

563d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

No doubt the beta looks slightly better on the PS4, but unless you zoom in and really focus on the detail comparison, the difference is hardly noticeable. That 900p vs 720p does make a difference.

563d ago 0 agree7 disagreeView comment

I see a lot of PC fanboys getting defensive. Don't be mad because the extra hundreds/ thousands of dollars you spent on a PC don't justify the small graphical difference.

It's not the console players' fault your decided to spend $20 more just to add guacamole to your $5 burrito.

566d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

Wow, you're delusional. Sure PC looks with ULTRA settings, but the small difference is not worth the extra $1000+. I'll stick with console.

566d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

The patch does not include the map. You have to go to the store and downloaded from there.

603d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

I agree with DICE; leave single player out. Because I know once I beat the game, I'll never touch the campaign again. But since DICE is taking this route, I sure as hell expect a good MP.

623d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

PS Fanboy Bubble ^

625d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

True, I would have preferred a online only crackdown, but oh well.

629d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Makes sense. Can't use cloud tech while offline. At least it gives people the option to play on/offline.

629d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nice, but 155 million is A LOT of consoles.

635d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

NO! That idea makes too much sense. It defeats the purpose of having something to complain about.

637d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

This is being blow way out of proportion. Are people seriously enraged by this, or they just looking for something MS related to complain about?

637d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

And 10-12 months of waiting for those who will get it on the PS4.

643d ago 5 agree5 disagreeView comment

Holiday 2016?? I was thinking the PS would get by 2016 at the latest.

643d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Sometimes, yes. But in the cases that it does perform better, the difference is almost unnoticeable.

643d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

PS fanboys will not be happy.

644d ago 17 agree15 disagreeView comment

Lol, and then you woke up.

644d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment