isntchrisl (User)

  • Contributor
  • 5 bubbles
  • 10 in CRank
  • Score: 27370
""

Comments

This isn't real, people. How many of these things do we have to see before people get it through their head? This one was particularly lazy about where the photo was taken (in a bedroom). It's also completely safe. Almost everything on that list has been announced already and Nintendo has gone out of their way to say they're going to show off a lot of games for the first time. #81
33d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
I'm personally not that concerned about the graphics. I'm much more worried about how repetitive the game will be. #2.1
123d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
I'm more interested in the Wii U version too. The fact that it's so far off (if it even comes out at all) is really disappointing to me. #1.1.1
124d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
And what was your reason for putting quotes and pointing to the article? It doesn't say anything remotely close to that. #1.3
265d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
It was an odd decision to release two somewhat similar heavy hitters so close to each other in the first place. I'm not surprised this happened. #5
266d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
At this point, I'd love for Nintendo to just buy Platinum outright. The guys at Platinum seem to like the idea, at least. #7
275d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
Nintendo has shown footage of the Wii U version. It looks fine. #1.4
284d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
Platinum would be a very fitting second party developer for Nintendo, I think. I'd love for Nintendo to buy a majority share in the company. Which of course means they won't. #19
314d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
What the hell? Why would Nintendo go out of their way to secure it as an exclusive if they were going to have so little faith in its performance? Do they really expect it to sell a ton of copies in the west? I'd imagine that Japan would be very attracted to this game's presentation. #6
324d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
Absolutely. A banned account means that person isn't paying to renew that account. And they aren't paying for DLC either. That's a lot of lost revenue for MS if they go ban-crazy. #95.1.1
324d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
This is one of the problems of making Xbox Live a subscription-based service. Microsoft has little incentive to cut their customers off from paying them money every year. #95
328d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
Oh, I'm not getting the Xbox One at all. I wasn't the person that hit "disagree." I think my first reply to you reflects that. I'm still interested in the PS4, but I am a bit bummed that they're charging for P2P multiplayer now. #8.2
384d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
It's more like: We were watching consumer polls and pre-order numbers and didn't like what we were seeing. #8.1
384d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
I'm not reversing my stance either. But it's disappointing to see how many people are quick to forget that until yesterday, this company was going to screw you over to their heart's content. #1.1
384d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
The Xbox One definitely has a very clear goal. And it doesn't include anyone that can't afford to feed Microsoft a lot of money. #1.2
397d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
N4G: comment first, read the article never. #5.1
414d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
The Wii version had fantastic controls. It was so satisfying to shoot an enemy in the knee and then pop him in the head. #1.1.2
428d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
Guess that means they're telling us ahead of time that they're going to be giving another game a 10/10. #38
428d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
Nothing screams "strong partnership" like announcing zero Wii U games for the year, EA. #3
434d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
There was also an MGS: Twin Snakes + GC bundle. #2.3
515d ago by isntchrisl | View comment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Showing: 1 - 20 of 162