But it's the underlying philosophy that's key: "The PS4 is a gaming machine that will function as a media box also, while the Xbox One is a media box that will also function as a gaming machine" #2.1
I'm struggling to think of anything that looks better. Uncharted: Golden Abyss and LittleBigPlanet Vita are probably the closest -- but I think this looks better. #1.1
Yeah there are a lot of reasons why, as discussed in the article. If it was a simple as switching a switch, then the feature would be a no-brainer. But sadly, it's more complicated than that. #25.2
The article's not an attempt at undermining the PS3's success. It's just a discussion about whether it's really important that the PS3 takes the lead at this stage. #3.1
It's to protect the idea. Just because they've registered it, doesn't mean it has to be implemented. A similar patent was actually registered for the PS3, too. #1.2
Spot on! With this offer, a bigger hard drive, and a year's worth of PS Plus, you're essentially getting 12 months of top gaming for less than £200! Such a bargain. #1.1
Oh, I agree, don't get me wrong. The sheer amount of original content is what makes PlayStation great. I'm just worried that the model is not sustainable.
Sony will know the answer to that better than I do. #7.1
But as the article discusses, they only have so much money they can spend on marketing. While the likes of Microsoft can spend ALL of that money on a single game like Halo 4, Sony simply has too many games to promote in the same way.
As such, I believe the sheer number of releases are what hurts the advertising in the long run. #3.1
Sony will know the answer to that better than I do. #7.1
As such, I believe the sheer number of releases are what hurts the advertising in the long run. #3.1