Top
CRank: 5Score: 0

Wait, since when did playing a game all of a sudden mean completing a game?

51d ago 17 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think it'll be their secret reveal at PSX 2017, kinda like how The Last of Us: Part 2 was last years.

65d ago 12 agree1 disagreeView comment

I wouldn't expect a New Elder Scrolls for quite a few years, simply because they're still focused on ESO and don't want to cannibalize its future with an entirely different Elder Scrolls.

65d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Metro never had the term exclusive mentioned anywhere at all(it was merely a world premier) and Battlegrounds is only a 'console launch exclusive' (aka timed exclusive).

66d ago 17 agree0 disagreeView comment

No it's not Saijahn. There's no reason they would write out 'console launch exclusive' instead of 'console exclusive' if it was in fact a pure exclusive.

67d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

They keep trying the same thing with games they announce. Just like Tomb Raider was an 'exclusive'. They're merely wording it a certain way to make it seem better than it is.

@knockknock: No, at their conference they specifically said "xbox console exclusive 2015' for Tomb Raider and they're doing the exact same thing by saying 'console launch exclusive' here. There's no reason to not just say 'console exclusive' if it is in fact...

67d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Player Unknown is a 'console launch' exclusive, not an actual pure exclusive, merely timed.

67d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lets just hope they make a fantastic game with great content, without having to prolong the experience artificially just so you feel like it's worth more in value. Any developer can prolong a gaming experience in a multitude of ways, but that doesn't make the game more worthy of the asking price, nor does it enhance the experience at all. Just let them make a great game, regardless of length.

71d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm not really sure you can call it unfair, considering you bought those games for the systems you had at the time and that was all that was promised for them. There wasn't no guarantee that future iterations of PlayStations would even play them. Would it be nice if they did PS1/2 games BC on PS4? Absolutely, but if Sony doesn't see it worth their time, they won't.

Honestly, how many out of the Millions of PS4 owners would actually play their old games on it...

73d ago 73 agree33 disagreeView comment

Yeah and apparently as of May of this year it had sold over 65 million units across all platforms. Which is insane.

296d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well, considering Sony wouldn't want to release two zombie games in one year (Days Gone/The Last of Us 2), this would make perfect sense to release one in 2017 and one in 2018. Plus , 2017 is already going to be a huge year for Sony with the possibility of Horizon, Gran Turismo Sport, Spiderman, Days Gone, God of War, Detroit: Become Human, HellBlade, et ecetra

326d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Concertoine: They didn't even say Dead Rising 4 is exclusive though?

430d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

That and I doubt Rockstar would be releasing two games (Mafia 3 being the other game) in one year anyways.

557d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes, but considering a lot of companies don't announce sales figures, we can only get estimates from what we do know. So, lets see.. current available information comes from EA which states that: '20% of all Xbox/PS4 sales are digital' ( http://www.examiner.com/art... )

So, by taking said information and assuming that'd be ro...

600d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

@The_Infected: I have no doubt that it's a great game (just haven't played it myself yet), just think that it deserves credit where credit is due. It's a fact that Ark is the best selling game and anyone can verify that by going here: http://store.xbox.com/en-US...

600d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

Except the fact that the site left out Ark: Survival Evolved, which is actually the best selling game.

600d ago 8 agree4 disagreeView comment

Exactly and considering its a new studio, they're going to need to get funding from somewhere.

611d ago 10 agree2 disagreeView comment

Thing thing is though, all these games were cheaper on BF.

622d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Exactly, its one thing to add microtransactions to a game they not only stated they wouldn't add them to, but they actually thought making those microtransactions boost your stats was a good idea? How in their right minds did they come to that conclusion?

I just don't get it at all and it's definitely lost them a lot of respect.

622d ago 8 agree1 disagreeView comment

Same here. Hopefully they do update the engine and gameplay a bit this time. That'd be nice.

622d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment