@cobra yeah the abilities are good just like in the first two games. But i'm just saying that even if Geralt clearly dodges an attack, as in clearly visibly missing, he can still get hit.
Combined with the controls and other things like human enemy patterns forcing the fight to last longer (unless you use bombs or something like that) it makes clunky and not very fun combat for me.
It had some good stuff like potions for boosts, but for me the mechanics were clunky. Actually the controls in general were clunky now that I think of it (at least on consoles). Like there was some lag and you couldn't move the speed you wanted to, either too slow or too fast. Other things like rolling out of the way and still getting hit are bigger problems in TW3.
The controls are some of the weakest I've played in a third person game, not just compared to bloodbor...
The Witcher 3's combat somewhat puts me off the game. I tried to start playing it for the third time, and after 15-20 hours I can't be bothered. The combat feels so outdated after playing the souls games and bloodborne, plus the main story is so uninteresting which is really disappointing after the first two games.
Halo 5 is the first one I can't be bothered beating, and I played through the whole MCC to prepare for it. And 343 KNOW how to make a good campaign sin...
Lol what? You were gonna buy an X1 for a F2P fighting game and a remaster for a nearly 10 year old game? The only people saying that don't WANT there to be any reasons to buy one
They did in the late PS3 days for plus. Like deus ex was given 2 years ago... And things like borderlands 2 and tomb raider less than 2 years from their release.
How many people actually did that on N4G though? At least when I started going here in 2008 the comments have always been mostly PlayStation biased. For example look at the GTA4 IGN review on N4G... There's no way you can tell me the Xbox fans were overpowering, at least in terms of the comments.
And even if it was such a problem, then surely the reverse is true? PlayStation fans were constantly saying the difference in multi plats hardly mattered, but now that it's i...
What are you guys on about? There was less... just about everything. Previous Souls games had many playstyles while Bloodborne only had one. Barely any environmental changes... The whole world looked the same. Less interesting characters.
And the biggest thing: Bloodborne was completely linear. I've said it before but Bloodborne has a world like Demon's Souls... If Demons souls went from 5 worlds to just 1 with a less interesting hub. How could anyone say bloodborne w...
I would argue that Tomb Raider should count for being exclusive this year... Since it is an exclusive this year. Next year obviously not, but for simply comparing the two console's 2015 it should count as an exclusive to me.
Also did they say it was the best overall year... Or the best holiday lineup? I could've sworn they said it was just the best holiday lineup of xbox history.
All PS4 had this year was bloodborne; a watered down version of the souls games and Until Dawn which was pretty good.
Not that I think Xbox's was that good, it's best exclusive was Tomb Raider and that's going multi-plat next year. Halo 5 was a disappointment but still solid and Forza was pretty good so I'd still put it just over the PS4's year but still.
PS4 looks like it has a way better lineup next year though. Hopefully God of War 4 is...
Valve are gonna announce Half Life 3
The sucker punch game better be a huge step up from second son, really disappointing after the first two.
Part 1 had a few missions that dragged on and on to the point of being bored half way through, especially the rachni queen one. Yeah it had exploration, but most of it was just pointless and empty. Combat was tedious for me. Had the best plot of the 3 though.
Part 2 had much better combat, and the individual missions were shorter and better paced, so no particularly boring parts. All the side characters were interesting (some more than others) and having anything from none to...
Coming from the guy with the Mass Effect 3 avatar
Yeah. I think the resolution plus the overkill lighting make it hard to see what's going on
I got bored and quit playing after 2 matches. It's battlefield minus the stuff that makes battlefield good.
Artistic freedom? Man that's what ruined the mass effect 3 ending
For me this whole thing only serves to make quiet less cool. I mean she's half naked the whole game, if she wore an actual cool outfit she'd be a badass. It's hard not to see her as just a bikini girl as it is. So for me this is another case of artistic freedom being kinda stupid. I don't think it should be such a big deal... But Kojima probably made her character like that to be controversi...
Combats up to preference. Their stories are both interesting and its cool how you have to look up stuff online to fully figure them out, can't really say one is better than the other. Game design? What about the game design? I know that there's barely any armor in bloodborne, and it all looks the same. That kind of design? Or maybe how everyone has the same playstyle since thas how the game was designed?
What do you mean by level design? It's nothing noteworthy co...
I agree in terms of... Actually no I can't think of any way bloodbornes better. It was worse in basically every way other than combat (which is up to preference).
Best game of last gen I'd agree with, plus with this gen being mostly full of rubbish with better graphics its basically better than anything this gen so far too. So not a bad choice.
Well the story reason is fine... doesn't change that the characters are boring. I think pretty most of the characters in the other souls games had tragic stories, but they were more interesting.
I don't think the story was any darker than the other Souls games, just the gothicness gave it that feeling. I liked that ending, but still it seems more like a disgusting kind of dark (in a good way) than a huge scale "the world is screwed" dark ending. If that mak...