Top
CRank: 5Score: 0

Yeah, as has been said for the past 6-7 years. Even though all those points are debatable, at best.

It's weird how much flack it gets now. Throughout 2010 just about everyone showered the game with praise. Even though it released in January, it still kept in people's minds to win a ton of game of the year awards. It wasn't an easy year to win either. Red Dead Redemption won a few more... but RDR would also have knocked out just about any other PS3/360 year. Sta...

18d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

It was very quick to find games after a few months of updates. There probably aren't many people playing it today though, since the launch was so bad. They did give a free Halo 3 ODST to everyone affected, so that kinda made up for it.

If they really want to make it better, they should cut it down to only one playlist to unite the playerbase. And Xbox should advertise that update on the xbox home menu.

18d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

It's a shame the Souls series didn't get more game of he year awards.

Demon's Souls suffered because it wasn't launched worldwide at release, and everyone was fixated on Uncharted 2 and MW2. Demon's Souls was certainly as good as those two, if not better as it was the first Souls game. The multiplayer was so innovative at the time.

The first Dark Souls was a masterpiece. It got 5 game of the year awards... Skyrim got over 200. It deser...

21d ago 0 agree7 disagreeView comment

@UCForce If you put your opinion on the internet, you usually do so because you want people to see it. Some people will disagree, and some will argue against your opinion. When you make something like a game of the year list, there will always be people that disagree. Don't like it? Don't go on the internet.

I think Uncharted 4 is highly overrated. In this case many people will disagree, some will agree. That's how it works.

21d ago 2 agree5 disagreeView comment

I disagree with the grenade indicator part is all. Just because I agree with one point, doesn't mean I agree with everything in the article. A grenade indicator wouldn't be good for gears, but the cover system is good. Come on, 2+2=4.

You've just confirmed you haven't played Gears 4 much, if at all. If you tap the button once while pushing forward, you simply go forward out of cover. If you hold it down, you go out of cover sprinting. If you introduce a doub...

22d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Marketing only sells the game, it doesn't keep people playing it.

26d ago 16 agree2 disagreeView comment

A lot of people like that system. Destiny probably has the highest retained online playerbase of this generation, it has to do something good to keep people playing.

26d ago 14 agree8 disagreeView comment

Like I said, mechanically they're similar. But Gears 4 feels much more fluid and snappy. This article even mentions this as something other games should learn from. The fact that you think otherwise tells me you haven't played gears 4.

The grenade icons are needed in Uncharted, because you couldn't see the grenade without it. The grenades are clearly visible in Gears, so no icon is needed. In fact I'd prefer they didn't add unnecessary rubbish on he scre...

26d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Too light feeling for me, felt like an arcade game. And because of it's arcade nature it got repetitive very quickly. If you take out all the fancy sliding and slow motion, it'd be somewhat bland. Those tricks didn't impress me for long.

I can certainly see why some would prefer the overall combat of Vanquish, it's much faster. But Gears still has better pure cover based shooting. I wasn't saying it's the best third person shooting action game... I&#...

27d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Uncharted's cover system is pretty ordinary. The gameplay of Uncharted is good for the COMBINATION of cover based shooting, platforming and puzzles. If you look at any of those aspects individually, they don't look so great on their own. Take out the platforming, and suddenly Uncharted's combat looks very plain. But obviously it goes very well with the platforming.

I love Mass Effect, but even Mass Effect 3's cover system was a tad clunky at times. It was th...

27d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I've played a lot of third person shooters... and even Gears 1 has a better cover system than many released today. What do you mean they offer you little to go by? Do you want someone to explain every tiny piece of detail about the cover system to you or something? A comparison with another TPS?

Gears 4 easily has the best pure third person shooter combat around. No contest.

27d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

Yes, because user reviews are a great way to measure a game's quality.

28d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Good. It deserves more awards this year, it's certainly up there with the likes of Uncharted 4 and Overwatch.

30d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment

If it isn't worse than RE4... it's going to be legendary.

36d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Yes, so that was done for story purposes. AKA the reason any character should be how they are.

I doubt it was done for equality.

36d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I liked 1943 the most.

37d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

What? The Witcher 3's free DLC fits that description perfectly. Tiny missions, armor, outfits... The first of which released literally the day after launch, the rest on a weekly basis. Most of them would have been cut from the game, the later ones would have taken next to no time to make. Clearly just looking to gain blind respect on the prospect of free DLC.

Not that I'm complaining... I'd much rather that, than having to pay for them. But still.

38d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lol you think Lords of the Fallen was great? Transformers = rubbish, Journey is a 4 and a half year old downloadable game, and RE is okay... but a pretty bland remaster overall. I guess that's an okay month... but certainly nothing compared to before the PS4 was released.

They gave things like Tomb Raider and Borderlands 2 1-2 years after their original release... it's gone waaaaay downhill.

40d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I remember when Plus was actually good.

40d ago 0 agree7 disagreeView comment

They probably weren't going for pure horror games after 3, have to score it on an action game scale. RE4 was a 10, RE5 was a 7-8, RE6 was a 3.

Your scale looks like it'll be good for RE7.

41d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment