PM me if your story is going to fail due to low approvals
CRank: 59Score: 0

I'm hyped to see what people make!

1165d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

Dem title infractions! Must resist reporting......

Well deserving winners all around.

1175d ago 11 agree2 disagreeView comment

My wife will be so pumped. Using the old instruments was her #1 thing if they made a new one as well.

1187d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

This is what I think happened:

This was their vision; what they wanted (as far as how the game turned out, obviously not about scores). It's just not what others seem to want (reviews). I'm sure they did see it coming, but to delay again to completely change it or add enormous amounts of content would probably cost a lot of time and $. A lot of time and $ to change their vision (ie: make a game for someone elses vision). They had their vision and they stuck to it. Cal...

1187d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment


Pretty much is pretty much what I was saying. It was never announced. Being a PC/PS4(barely) dev there are a lot of potential hurdles and questions.

-Parity clause? They are independent now. I'm sure MS will waive it for them, but the talk probably couldn't happen until the deal was done. PS2 is out on PS4 already and H1Z1 is out on PC already. DCU on both.

-Dev equipment and staff for Xbox: Do they have the equipment and/or s...

1201d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah, I agree with basically all. YG's are great.

Don't think they'll be doing exclusives either, but we don't really know what existing deals were already in place, if any.

The games are fun, but they are also kind janky/rough around the edges. Good ideas/concepts, but just okay execution on them. It's something I'm perfectly fine with, I did like Dust514 quite a bit after all. But I can see a lot of console players not being okay w...

1201d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

You know that wasn't announced right? They said they could make games for other platforms now and were looking forward to it. They did not announce any game for any other platforms yet.

Not to be a Debbie Downer or anything, but I see a lot of people saying the same thing, but it's factually inaccurate. It also has quite a way to go on PC before anything happens elsewhere so it's kinda counting the chickens before the eggs hatch.

1201d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

Heya stranger!

1231d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

South Park isn't on PS4

1287d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

Go to sleep or go back to bed! You'll figure it out.

Mines prolly SoM

1287d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

You can do the same thing with PS4; but that and this are inherently different.

Shareplay is to anyone on your friends list, but 'gamesharing' is only for the 2 active consoles under that user.

This isn't exactly unexpected restrictions as they stated it could be blocked, but I don't think this is working as intended in these particular cases. Probably something that needs to be fixed, but we wouldn't know who has to fix it unless they say ...

1300d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Good luck everyone!

1333d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

So...there's a few angles here as is the case with most 'controversial' stories here on N4G. Nothing is ever black and white.

1 - the link was broken at the time, that gets other stories failed so why not this one? (rhetorical)

2 - a report on the story: 'Making web traffic out of somebody's depression-fuelled break-up on the basis of one-sided allegations' - I feel this is very true. Grounds for failing? Probably not, but I think you ...

1341d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment


You've incorrectly determined what 'removed' means, that's not a mods fault. It would remove it from the front page header and hide the story unless you have the filter turned off. No one told you the site would be banned, you assumed that incorrectly. We all know how it works, it appears you're the one who doesn't. Sites only get banned for plagiarism, we're not going to just ban sites all willy nilly, that would be completely unfair and ag...

1341d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

idk what to tell you other than that I wasn't involved with it so I don't really know.

Also, damn you for making me google gamergate, I'd really rather have not.

All I could really say is I'm sure there was a noted reason and said mod thought they were doing the right thing per N4G's rules. We don't get emails from anyone saying do this or don't do that. People seem to think there is a lot more behind the scenes here than there rea...

1341d ago 6 agree3 disagreeView comment

@Fox - the reasons for your proposed banning don't matter unless they involve plagiarism/theft.

@ghost - Cat would de-mod someone so fast if that actually happened. And I'm not sure exactly what you're saying, but there is always a reason for a story failing.

Voting affects the site rating, which can in turn hide opinion pieces and rumors under the content filter (the little drop down above the story type in the front page news feed).

1341d ago 7 agree17 disagreeView comment

N4G doesn't do journalism, we don't make news, so that would be impossible. N4G is just an aggregation site, we don't even have domain emails (ie: [email protected] doens't exist)

@Fox - sites don't get banned b/c people don't like them. Plagiarism is basically the only reason.

edit: you guys are free to believe what you want, but facts are facts.

1341d ago 10 agree17 disagreeView comment

Thanks ConsoleTuner!

Would be interested to see what one of these can do.

1350d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Who the hell doesn't like free stuff!

1350d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Doubt this will be seen, but if you guys want to make your moderation issues public then I guess it's okay to chime in for the other side.

Kotaku story:
The source of the news was Kotaku, so it needs to link there. Pretty strait forward 'wrong source' report.

'Plenty of N4G articles are allowed to publish in this format' - Uh, no. Going through to the front page and being 'allowed' are 2 differe...

1370d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment