DragonKnight (User)

  • Contributor
  • 10 bubbles
  • 9 in CRank
  • Score: 164460
"Respect is not something to just be given. It is the result of accepting principles as worthwhile."

Comments

What these articles fail to comprehend is that if everyone followed this articles advice, the consoles would fail and cease to exist due to lack of return on the investment. Early adopters are the lifeblood of all launches. It's ignorant to tell people not to buy a console at launch and sad that there are insecure PC gamers like this. #1.3.3
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
First 3 paragraphs: You yourself mentioned non-gaming ads maniac.

"Oh, but sometimes in the faaaar right hand corner, sometimes there is an unrelated ad."

You don't see any right now, cool. Does that mean they aren't there?

http://www.penny-arcade.com...

Second Point:... #5.2.1
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
They are still not interested in money either. #2
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
And there's the final nail in the coffin. The word "accessible" means watered down, casual garbage. Not that this game had anything good going for it to begin with, this just makes it worse. #2
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
"MS didn't, third party companies did....

Actually Microsoft did with Live and the original Xbox. Feel free to look it up at your convenience.

"Yes they did..."

The problem I have with your speculation specifically about PS3's online is that if you were right then there would be a point where Sony wouldn't have to bother keeping PS3's access free. According to Sony, PS3 online gameplay will always be free. What... #5.1.1
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
@PFFT: Proof or GTFO. #1.2.6
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
@Gozer: Ok then, how about a linear QTE game designed to be easy and casual whose best quality is that, because it's linear, Crytek can use their patented development style of looks over substance? Does that about cover it? #1.1.4
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
You do understand that Microsoft, like the other 2, actively search out games they want right? Microsoft does everything they can to make people think CoD is an Xbox game, and it's not the only game they do that to. Most of what they target are shooters. Just because they don't OWN the games doesn't mean they don't promote having more of them. #1.2.2
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
"Say whatever you want about DRM, but it's not coming back like how MS originally planned for it. That is a foregone conclusion now."

I would like to ask you what you think "100% committed to our original vision" means? #3.1
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
1. PC is an open platform that can't be controlled. There's literally no way MS can prevent games looking better on the PC at all. Plus, PC is their main market for their OS and it'd be counter-productive to make any attempts against it.

2. What's your point? What's worse, setting the precedent or working within it?

3. And yet the PS3 still manages to sell games of a wide variety very well, never completely focusing on one genre, while the... #1.2
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
Be dismissive of what this blog says all you want but the writing is on the walls. There is precedent to back up what has happened, and MS seeks to create precedent for the Future. I've said this all along, Microsoft is bad for gaming. They are, 90% of the time (meaning not always but most of the time), the first to introduce the most anti-consumer/pro-corporate policies and programs into gaming.

They introduced microtransactions and DLC into console gaming. They may not... #5
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
Again, everything you're saying is irrelevant.

You're literally the only person who felt that what I said needed any kind of clarification or explanation. Everything you say is pointless and incorrect. Which you seem to enjoy.

I get you're thinking that I was the Captain Obvious, but you're the only one that needed a clarification, needed to actually come out said "hurr durr, that's why they said U.S. and not global." Yeah, no sh... #3.1.5
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
Your point is irrelevant though. Either as a restatement of what I said, or as the more likely Captain Obvious moment, either statement was unnecessary to what I said. #3.1.3
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
Yeah duh. That's why I said "US Gamers maybe" first. Mission failed Captain Obvious. #3.1.1
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
I love this idea Xbox One fans have that just because Kinect is being forced on anyone it automatically means that all or even most will incorporate Kinect features into the game.

Of course, when Microsoft forces them to, that'll be a different story. But don't kid yourselves, Kinect 2 is just as much a gimmick as Kinect 1. #1.2.4
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
US gamers maybe. Global gamers doubtful. #3
550d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
@rainslacker: Yeah, I hear what you're saying. I just really think that coming out and saying "we purposely made this bad" is either the result of a terrible design choice or an indictment against the skill of the devs and will definitely impact enthusiasm for any game. Even if I am 100% wrong about that, it's not exactly smart to come out and tell people you purposely chose to make a game mechanic bad just to discourage its use. It's far more logical to just remove the... #6.3.6
551d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
Like you said in the Xbox One version of this article..

"Don't argue with my opinion" #2.2.1
551d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
Just saw this site trying to play both sides as though they weren't. I'm personally voting both stories down. #11
551d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
Ooohhh, this site is whoring itself out now is it? First it did this with the PS4 and then goes and does it with Xbox One too?

Welp, time to vote down both articles. #5
551d ago by DragonKnight | View comment
1 ... 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 ... 498
Showing: 3661 - 3680 of 9943