Insert Thought Provoking Quote Here


CRank: 9Score: 0

"That's fantastic for people who may have difficulties playing on the harder modes, but that is absolutely NOT how the developers intended most people to experience the game."

Your statement can be interpreted as saying that the Harder difficulties are the intended way to play and thus should be the default difficulty. This is not true. The devs create the systems of play and the intended way to play the games is simply by using those systems. No more, no less...

3d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Some words of wisdom.

4d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Because the protagonist was male, and unless you want a male character with boobs and a vagina (because that's what you would have received), then that's all the reason that's necessary. Especially after factoring in the co-op.

4d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Dynasty Warriors is a hack 'n slash. It plays exactly like a hack 'n slash. Guess what you do to waves of enemies in a hack 'n slash? Same thing you do in Dynasty Warriors.

"Warrior games hardly improved since DW2"

Spoken like someone who hasn't played any since DW2.

7d ago 3 agree6 disagreeView comment

You're asking if a hack and slash series still plays like a hack and slash series. If you didn't like it up until now, you won't like it now.

7d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

They probably will be though, that's the problem. I mean, Lu Lingqi with Xing Cai's weapon doesn't really create the idea of a differing moveset. Think DW6.

7d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Weapon clones are back. Bigger than ever.

7d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

You'll love it. Also has amazing music.

7d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's the same concept as Let's Plays. People are more there for the player, not the game. That's not to say they aren't there for the game, but most people like the interaction of streams.

8d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Genuine-User: You're the one that's projecting. Your immediate response to a comment that should have nothing to do with you in any way is to go on the offensive and insult someone. This sets up the idea that you either are jealous (fragile and insecure), or just someone that likes to pick a fight. Pick one.

You can judge people all you want by what they write, but that's not what you did. You labeled someone who said something you didn't like as basically ...

8d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

@Genuine-User: Does your family know that you're fragile and insecure?

@81BX: Why? Appreciating beauty is bad?

@KwietStorm: LMFAO!! You win 1 internets.

@Genuine-User 2: Ah the standard "if they don't agree with me, they're far right/Nazi" schtick. Congrats on diluting terms and parroting cult chants.

9d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Her name is Kelly Jean.

9d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

"Its 2017"

Two things. First...



9d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

NewMonday is correct. I first noticed this problem way back when Child of Light came out and Ubisoft allowed you to share video but not audio. The result was watching a clip without sound.

But the most egregious example I personally have seen thus far has been Persona 5. Atlus has blocked all capture potential for Persona 5 on the PS4. You don't even get to have pics when you earn a trophy. It's pathetic.

9d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

If you think Children of Zodiarcs is a true successor to Tactics, you need to either actually play Tactics, or play it again.

Tactics is a level of quality that hasn't been reproduced and, sorry to say, in this current gaming age it won't be reproduced. The game is damn near perfect on every level, and there is not going to be another alignment of planets to make that happen again unfortunately.

And that is a shame too. Because SE knows that Tacti...

9d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Continue kissing a** all you want to. Far be it from people to prefer that development be focused on the most important aspects and not shoehorning modes in to check off boxes and open up cash grabbing opportunities.

13d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I think neither of you understand the point.

Time and resources were spent on this feature that nobody was asking for, no one was even thinking about, and to be quite honest nobody wanted. That's time and resources that could have been better spent on literally anything else that was actually more important.

The industry has already given us examples of what adding in multiplayer can do to a single player campaign, and vice versa. Do you honestly thin...

13d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

"Therefore, if you don't agree, you are wrong. Pretty simple."

Actually you're the one that's wrong. Because you're telling people that disagreeing with microtransactions is wrong. Disagreeing with cash grabs is wrong. Take your apologetics and blind corporate defense somewhere where you won't harm everyone else's enjoyment.

13d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Buy used so they get nothing from you.

13d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Problem is, this game DOES have a multiplayer aspect that WILL be affected by these Microtransactions. You can pay to build your forces quicker. The same forces that will defend your base in the online mode. This is complete and utter shite.

13d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment