Quantcast

dennett316 (User)

  • Member
  • 5 bubbles
  • 5 in CRank
  • Score: 18410
""

Comments

Not in all cases. I'd argue that the majority of the time, it's the fragile egos of the gamers reading the review that are broken, their ability to provide counter argument to perceived criticism without resorting to insults or childish claims of "BIAS!" without knowing what the word actually means, their inability to handle opinions that don't match their own. That is what is more broken than ever. The review process has remained the same for decades, warts and all. #7.1
196d ago by dennett316 | View comment
There's no such thing as objective when it comes to good or bad Hicken. How else can you call a game good when there's no objective standard for what constitutes a good game?

The only objective criteria would be does the game function as intended - as in you put the disc in the drive, the game loads up and you can play it. Everything else after that is ALL opinion. You can back that opinion up with solid reasons based on what you experience, to make it more solid a... #6.1.4
196d ago by dennett316 | View comment
Just had a quick look at the review and they confused the bone charm perks with the abilities you unlock by finding runes throughout the game...not sure how they managed that as they talked about the runes and the abilities like Blink just before it.
All in all, it's a very positive review with a strangely low score. Presentation, graphics and sound scores are very low for some reason, despite them having no problems with the graphics. It's basically a 7/10 score they gave,... #3
197d ago by dennett316 | View comment
That little intro paragraph is enough to tell you that the writer of this article is a bit of a moron. Don't like wrestling all you like, but don't dismiss it in such a disrespectful fashion. It'd be like someone saying playing video games is the pastime of fat sweaty basement dwellers who like to play with their sticks (wink wink)...it completely invalidates your opinion.
And it's a shame, as the article raises a few decent points about the impact of certain moves b... #2
199d ago by dennett316 | View comment
All reviews are subjective...there are no, and will never be any, purely objective reviews. The very notion is idiotic.

There would have to be some sort of standard game that all others could be measured against in order to come to an objective viewpoint on a game. With so many different genres, concepts, ideas, game styles, art styles, etc...there's ZERO possibility of there ever being an objective standard of what a game should be. #1.9.1
200d ago by dennett316 | View comment
How can you possibly have a review without opinion? The only perspective a reviewer can have is their own, they can't possibly review it with a mind to what some imaginary other person might want...that's ludicrous.

Do you really think all Halo fans want exactly the same things? Which criteria should he judge on if not his own? What you've just outlined is such a bizarre notion, I'm surprised you actually typed it and that someone agreed. #1.7.1
200d ago by dennett316 | View comment
I think it's time the games industry took a look at itself and really examine just how foolish they're being.
Make digital sales cheaper than RRP. High street sales are waning fast, with online shopping being the overwhelmingly preferred method of getting games because it's cheaper.
Stop trying to placate a market that's slowly dying and instead embrace where the majority want to do their shopping....online.
Make digital downloads cheaper than online r... #4
201d ago by dennett316 | View comment
Taxes are involved in ALL sales, retail or digital in the EU. There is also a reduction in costs for the publisher as they don't have to reduce the price they charge to allow for stores to make money, no shipping costs etc. Digital sales should NEVER cost more than retail....fact.
They are trying to gouge customers in the name of convenience because they know there are people lazy and stupid enough to actually pay that amount. #3.1
201d ago by dennett316 | View comment
Name a sequel that isn't. Huh, just thought of one myself...Super Mario Bros. 2.
Anyway, most sequels are 'more of the same, but bigger and better'. #26.1
203d ago by dennett316 | View comment
Is it possible that you dressed up your opinion in as confrontational a headline as possible to bait for hits? If Arkham City is terrible, what's something like Amy or Hydrophobia? That's why your opinion is being disregarded offhand. #4.5.1
203d ago by dennett316 | View comment
Really Memots, you couldn't put it better than THAT incomprehensible garbage above?
Terrible spelling, no capitalization, thinks the plural of sheep is sheeps (that's something 5 year old's say), putting out malformed brain farts and daring to call his rambling nonsense opinions truth.

Here's a hint Morkendo23, people are allowed to "bit;h and whin" as you put it, about games all they like. Just because other, more important things happen ev... #4.4.3
203d ago by dennett316 | View comment
"Don't be a sheep, be an individual who buys the latest military FPS from a corporation with a massive advertising budget to tell me just how great the game is with slick trailers".

Uh huh. Look, MoH is trying so hard to be CoD that it hurts. With the real thing out in a few days, why in the hell should people take a risk on an inferior copy of a formula perfected by another company?

If you truly want to be an individual, buy something differe... #7.1.3
203d ago by dennett316 | View comment
People that pay for those unbalancing items shouldn't be allowed to play with those who haven't paid. If it only affects the single player experience, that's fine, but if an advantage can be gained in multiplayer because of this, it's unfair.
Any idiot who would pay for the chance to get less reward from their gameplay frankly deserves to be ripped off. #37
203d ago by dennett316 | View comment
And opinions like this are the reason you only have one bubble...what utter drivel.
The story of GTA 3 is very basic, but Vice City and San Andreas have great stories filled with funny and likeable characters...that's precisely what kept people playing the series.
That you were terrible at the games and couldn't get through the story does NOT mean that everyone else didn't. #7.1.1
206d ago by dennett316 | View comment
PETA are scumbags who support terrorist behaviour from animal rights movements like the Animal Liberation Front and the like. They butcher the VAST majority of the animals they claim to save, are riddled with hypocrites from top to bottom and are essentially only in it for the celebrity endorsements and money.
They care nothing for animals, only their own carefully crafted publicity machine. Even IF Pokemon were a franchise where each fight ended in the death of an animal, the entir... #7
206d ago by dennett316 | View comment
"so be their choice"? Ouch, that's not great writing, really not enticing me to click the article.
Then again, being called The Vixen Gamer doesn't help either. Could be worse though, could be another in the line of 'State emotional state here' Gamers that try to cash on on the AVGN's success.

Just had a quick skim of the article and she calls the games detractors "haters"...that should tell you all you need to know. There... #1
206d ago by dennett316 | View comment
Agreed 100%, don't know why they've added so many extra steps. And the lag is definitely there as it's constantly trying to load big images on the right of the screen rather than thumbnails.
Annoying, surely improvements are supposed to streamline the process rather than make it more clunky? #17.1
212d ago by dennett316 | View comment
I don't like the new store at all. It takes several extra button presses to be able to download anything, the design ensures that less items are shown onscreen than were before, it is clunky when scrolling down the numerous departments as it's constantly trying to load stuff on the right side of the screen.

I'll eventually get used to it, but frankly I don't think it's an improvement at all...it was much smoother and intuitive before the change. Don'... #22
212d ago by dennett316 | View comment
I think games companies are starting to realise that there's not much further they can push graphics and resolution and the like before it starts getting really cost prohibitive to consumers and developers.
If the rumours about the next Xbox turn out to be true - eg augmented reality approach - then the big companies seem to have realised this and are looking towards different experiences rather than POWER POWER POWER. That will still be a factor of course, but not the focus IMO.... #4
212d ago by dennett316 | View comment
People would be more inclined to give it a chance if they weren't pulling that old trick of ensuring there's no reviews available until the launch day has come and gone.
It's a lot of money to waste on a potential dud, and if the publisher are doing whatever they can to ensure that the paying public aren't informed about the game, that sets off warning signs in countless gamers who have no doubt been burned before.
There's so much competition in the FPS mar... #15.3
212d ago by dennett316 | View comment
1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 19
Showing: 201 - 220 of 365