darkpower (User)

  • Contributor
  • 5 bubbles
  • 13 in CRank
  • Score: 147590
"That just happened!"


They gave a JRPG feel to earning them
You can gain levels that will be easier to read than a gamerscore (you'll instantly know how much more of less of a gamer you are than the people on your friend list), and there is a platinum trophy that you won't be allowed to get until you gain every other trophy the game has to offer (which is worth a TON of XP).

And by the time the first wave has crashed onto shore, 70% of all games on the PS3 will have it supported (apparently, when Sony says real soon as far as patches go,... #14.2
2558d ago by darkpower | View comment
Ugh, you guys are very lucky...
...I haven't discovered the game and won't be able to buy it until this Friday (me being F'N BROKE).

However, if Folklore, MLB08, or a certain game featuring a certain aged tactical espionage action hero gets its patch tomorrow or Thursday.... #12
2558d ago by darkpower | View comment
Well, possibly from my above comment:
I got a bubble and another ignore (from someone, ty for the bubble, btw).

As for the ignore, I can only imagine: There are too many possibilities. I've actually defended MS on quite a few things on this site (I do not have a problem with Vista, for one).

Still, that's a hell of a ratio: 168 ignores to 7. And still no reason why right now anyone should care about L4D.

[email protected]: And when anti-PS3 "FUD" is posted on this site, where are your prea... #14.8
2558d ago by darkpower | View comment

There's a few others to try out (not to say that there are only three other good PS3 games, in case some 360 fanboy wants to try that argument to this comment, but those are three PS3 exclusive games I have played so far that I think you'll enjoy). #18.1
2558d ago by darkpower | View comment
Guys acting like the PS3 never gets attacked here.
Several stories about how the 360 will still dominate left and right on here without even a peep from you, yet if there is even one article saying that about the PS3, it's suddenly bad for anyone to say anything about it. Screams double standard ("good for us to blow our loads on N4G about pro-360 flamebait, but if you dare post one pro-PS3 "flamebait" article, you better watch out for the labels").

EDIT@Jason 360:

1. You are, by all accounts, a... #14.4
2558d ago by darkpower | View comment
I, for the most part, agree with you.
However, I do need to bring up this point:

N4G was made in order for us to get the most news about the games we care about from all sources across the internets. That was its original intention. We come here when we need a short break from our hobby to find out about the newest things that are to happen with the games we love and about the things in the gaming industry that should spark our interests. However, when these articles come about that only spark flaming amongst fanboys... #38.1
2558d ago by darkpower | View comment
Gamersday, you're not helping.
And you know what is worse than him?

These MS fanboys that seem to try to tell him off by trying to upstage his fanboyness. #13.5
2558d ago by darkpower | View comment
Wow, POG...
Someone is taking this thing WAY too out of proportion, are they?

But wait...Bad Company had this many people play it on ANY system? I thought people were not going to play it since it WAS EA that published it. #9.13
2558d ago by darkpower | View comment
@Forbidden: PLEASE give it up. It's obvious that SOMETHING happened with that "patent" for Sony to go ahead with it (since they have been saying it and it never even got known that there WAS a patent before Ripten brought it up).

@20.1: It was rejected? I want to read more about THIS one! #23.3
2560d ago by darkpower | View comment
Your name fits you.
Did you NOW decide to crawl out from under that ROCK you've been living in since last year?

Let me tell you of some things that have happened since you were asleep... #43.2
2562d ago by darkpower | View comment
Even if I had a 360...
...I don't know if any announcement of Doom 4 really would interest me. It's not really the "must-have" that the franchise used to be about. #25.2
2562d ago by darkpower | View comment
As you have in the past, Max...
You just miss the ENTIRE point of the article, which is that there is always one person that will not like a certain game for whatever reason, and they decided to show you that that is very much true. It never meant that the games aren't excellent, just that the guy that decided to hate on it actually didn't like it and why he feels he's in the right (even though he's in the minority). #3.5
2562d ago by darkpower | View comment
Some things for you, Solar:
1: How in the blue HELL do you have so many bubbles when you not only pull unbelievable fanboy ditrabe out of your ass, but you try to hide that you ARE a fanboy when one calls you on it? It's a wonder to me!
2: Umm...do you just insult anyone who is calling Valve on their laziness with the only comeback you have: "Their PS3 elitists" and "if the ps3 brats dont get anything they want it automatically sucks"? Excuse me, what have these 360 fanboys done to MGS4 over t... #15.4
2564d ago by darkpower | View comment
To get the obvious out of the way: You showed the lunatic fringe there. Unfortunately, that DOES exist, and that does NOT help the people that want a reasonable debate over what was said about the game in the review. Let's not make the mistake that that kind of behavior is a one way street, though. I've seen TOO many 360 fanboys act like idiots on this site, and for anyone, you, me, or anyone else, to think that it's only fanboys of a select system that acts that way is irresponsible. And lik... #22.10
2566d ago by darkpower | View comment
So, wait, if they disagree with this review, you're a "tool"?
Wow, way to fail, sir. My God, however way you put it, you just told everyone that they are not allowed to disagree with this one review.

Here's the fact: If you want to give a game a low score, fine. The issue is that if you're going to give a game that has gotten a HIGH majority of 10s and 9s across the board, you might want to really inform the public about EVERYTHING you saw that led you to give it that score, and not mislead the people reading your review by saying that some... #22.7
2566d ago by darkpower | View comment
As you've probably thought I would respond to you anyway.
I can see disagrees happening already only because I'm telling YOU, the EIC of Bitbag, this (and I know I get disagrees whenever I even REMOTELY criticize you because "how dare you criticize us"). But before you do, let me mention why I have a problem with your post (it's basically the same as the others that have said similar things And Durffen, this is for you, too). You might not disagree so quickly.

First, your right that people have a right to an opinion. That in o... #50.1
2566d ago by darkpower | View comment
@2.5: Knowing Breakfast's track record on this site...
...that WASN'T that clear cut that it was a joke (again, you're assuming it was to begin with. Knowing his record on this site, he could be VERY serious at doing something like that). You can't guarantee us that he WAS joking about kneecapping the game like that. How do you know that he IS?

And, like I said, if it WAS a joke, it wasn't funny. #2.6
2567d ago by darkpower | View comment
How in the HELL did YOU get subtracted to only one bubble when you put up some good stuff like THAT.

I'm giving you a bubble for that one and am also encouraging others to do the same, because you just hit the nail on the f'n HEAD there.

With your permission, let me repost what you said just in case someone with filters decides to not care to show your comment:

***"not appraising games for the sake of peer conformity;"

I guess they... #3.1
2567d ago by darkpower | View comment
It's also sad...
...that they are getting exposed with reviewing this game without detailing all the facts about the game or spewing falsehoods about the game that anyone that has actually PLAYED the game could tell you are only strawmen (saying that it wasn't your cup of tea is one thing, but omitting several key gameplay elements that might've influenced the score if you were to bring them up in the review and saying that something is in the game that isn't at all is another thing altogether. It's not the s... #22.1
2567d ago by darkpower | View comment
And even if it was...
...that's kind of a cheap shot, Breakfast. Submitting a lackluster review (that, by the way, got some things wrong...there's no 45 minute cutscene in the game unless you want to count the ending, and again, why the omitting of the Solid Eye or the Mk. 2) just so the game can get a color lower and satisfy your fanboy wants is nothing more than doing that "kneecapping" that this site said others were doing to get notice.

Again, I wonder why you want others to hate this ga... #2.3
2567d ago by darkpower | View comment
1 ... 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 ... 168
Showing: 3081 - 3100 of 3352