You haven't played the game have you?
Climax doesn't refer to sexuality, although it's a play on words. It's a description of her finishers.
"setting the bar low"
Bayonetta 2 is a superb game and the WiiU didn't hold it back. You're missing the point.
So it's not a hack and slash because it''s not running on your preferred system?
You have to be pretty delusional.
>Bayonetta 3 will need to be heavily scaled down in terms of textures, frame rate, and resolution to run on the Switch.
The gpu alone has better performance than the WiiU, so what downgrade?
He says : We are developers that get funded to make games for said company
you : OMG HE HATES X Y AND Z
>Nintendo can change their attitudes but even then it still won’t be at as fast a pace as competitors
Yeah they can, you just need the right people and a good investment.
You seem to think money has no play in this, nor the people who know about building infrastructures.
Again Sony and MS aren't using tech that's exclusive to them. You can argue that some of their tooling is, but again those are build on existing tech. Their infrastruc...
> but the late 2010s is completely unreachable for a company like them.
No, again, tech provides tools that make it more feasible. Nintendo just needs to invest. It isn't miyamoto doing netcode and infrastructure, It's a separate group all together that they hire.
You keep hammering how Nintendo can't keep up, they can, they just need to invest and change their attitudes about stuff like friendcodes. The tech is there they just need to app...
>You're talking about one game rather as opposed to the entire service
That wasn't the point. I was simply saying that they could do something if they wanted to but instead are investing in smaller infrastructures. I'm not excusing their behavior im just saying that they will have to keep up at some point.
>Nintendo will never be on par with rival online services.
Nonsense. As tech progresses so will it equalize featur...
@_-EDMIX-
>Hardware has absolutely nothing to do with the issues regarding Nintendo not having an online infrastructure.
That's what I said, not sure why you're arguing that with me.
> Why would Nintendo need to charge for an online service when they barely have games with online functionality?
Because they have other third parties to to please as well. Nintendo has failed to do so in the past and it has certainly hit them. Newer generation of kids are also more online and it would be foolish of them not to move with tech.
Also lol @ downvotes. If Nintendo really didn't care they would have gone green with their dumb online set...
@RPGSama
I'm not arguing how long it will take, rather that it is inevitably.
The company is growing more and more and losing its rigid attitude.
>had better online functionality than the console
You're missing one fundamental part. It isn't so much the hardware as it is infrastructure. Nintendo hasn't been investing in a good infrastructure for online stuff. Mario kart on Wii had some solid online play. It was basic but the lag was pretty much non existing. And that's just for ONE game.
It's only a matter of time before Nintendo is up to par with the others. It's not a m...
> I have some biases against Nintendo
> therefor their online should be free
Also asking money for services isn't greedy, they are a business and you're free not to pay. That's how it works. You don't care for a product you vote with your wallet.
> While Nintendo will never even offer 1/5 what Sony and M$ offers as always
Why does this matter? The argument was "but I already pay for other services so Nintendo should make it free" is some entitled train of thought.
>But of course Nintendo fanboys as ever will justify any Nintendo decisions and weaknesses.
You're just barking down the wrong tree. I don't care what Nintendo does with their online system or w...
>Valve manage to pay for their servers without a subscription fee
Valves complete system relies on online connectivity. They are making bank on all the revenue. Nintendo also manufactures hardware and develops games. Valve pretty much hasn't been doing much other than just offering games at a percentage of revenue. Two completely different eco systems.
If you really want to take a piss at someone look at Blizzard for asking 12 bucks for a month of ...
>but I would rather not pay that either since we already pay for PS+ and XBL which is $60 a year.
Why is this Nintendos problem? lol
Whatever you think of the excuse, paid services mean they can be improved over time. If they have to use a budget from a different division you can bet on it that it won't get much afterthought.
They seriously need to introduce online play with their older games. Emulators have been doing online play for ages.
COMPANY HEAD SAYS THEIR PRODUCT IS GREAT
IN OTHER NEWS WATER MAKES THINGS WET
Everything is Nintendos IP. Im not sure what Wonderfulmonkeyman is talking about. Rare worked for Nintendo, fully funded by Nintendo.
He hasn't disappointed with 1 and 2. His passion and vision is pretty clear.