Try our new beta!Click here

Benoski (User)

  • Contributor
  • 10 bubbles
  • 6 in CRank
  • Score: 15640
""

Comments

Yeah. Definitely worth it.

You can download third party software to play multiplayer, though. #4.2
1d 5h ago by Benoski | View comment
Because people like me want it?

This rumour's probably fake anyway.... #11.1
9d ago by Benoski | View comment
I'm deeply concerned. It might be fake, but even if it's real, then EA will have to try EXTRA hard to make this game good. They rushed Battlefront out the door, so there's that to consider.

Secondly, does this make the first game canon? I'm pretty sure that Disney said that ALL Star Wars games were made non-canon... #8
9d ago by Benoski | View comment
Episode 8 got delayed to December last week, Alexious. #5.1.2
14d ago by Benoski | View comment
I just hope for an E3 reveal... #1
14d ago by Benoski | View comment
Didn't EA say they planned to release a Star Wars game every year?

Let's look at it this this:

- Visceral's game is at least a few years away.

- BioWare is busy on Mass Effect: Andromeda

- DICE have their hands full with Mirror's Edge, Battlefield and Battlefront DLC.

If EA still has a SW game to release this year, then what on Earth could it be? #6
14d ago by Benoski | View comment
You want to regain my trust? Start making great games again, and by that, I mean by releasing products in their entirety, not stripping them down to the bone just so you could sell the rest as DLC.... #5
15d ago by Benoski | View comment
Splatoon wasn't a first person shooter, though. It was third person. #1.1.2
19d ago by Benoski | View comment
I don't think Nate will die since he's just too popular. Sully 'died' twice already, so I don't think they'll do it a third time, although it IS possible.

I honestly think Sam is going to bite the bullet by the end of this game, and his death will prove to Nate just how risky fortune hunting is, causing him to permanently retire. #9
34d ago by Benoski | View comment
Why does that sound familiar? Oh yeah, we did this in the first three games!

Nothing new. #4
38d ago by Benoski | View comment
They seriously need to make the offline mode more robust. The SP offerings are just pathetic. #15
39d ago by Benoski | View comment
I'm sorry, but not even an ARG can convince me that this is actually in development.

I'll only believe it when they actually announce it. However, it's been too long that I think it's best to just leave it. They know they won't be able to live up to the hype. #2
40d ago by Benoski | View comment
They've already confirmed that guns will not be usable in the game. You won't even be able to pick them up. #1.1
41d ago by Benoski | View comment
They're only saying this because it's now their turn to make the yearly Call of Duty game.

Expect more generic crap in the form of Ghosts 2..... #8
41d ago by Benoski | View comment
Good. Hopefully Square Enix has learned their lesson and know that we want a proper Sleeping Dogs 2, not F2P crap like this. #8
51d ago by Benoski | View comment
They've already clearly stated that their whole focus is on GTA Online now.

I don't see this happening. #6
54d ago by Benoski | View comment
And just like that, I now have another game to buy in 2016. :) #3
67d ago by Benoski | View comment
I don't really know. A lot of people seems to have loads of mistrust in Schafer due to the Broken Age fiasco. #2
69d ago by Benoski | View comment
Meanwhile, I'm waiting for it to arrive on PS4. -_-

This is just PR BS, and shouldn't be taken seriously. #25
71d ago by Benoski | View comment
One of my favourite FPS games period. Will probably play it again in December to prepare myself for 'The Force Awakens', even though this game has no relation to it.

It still sucks that it's never going to get a sequel. Curse you, LucasArts/Disney!

I mean, it's possible for EA to reboot it, but let's be honest? Do EA ever listen? #7
84d ago by Benoski | View comment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Showing: 1 - 20 of 149