Top

Akagi

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 0

Certainly isn't FF13: Tunnels. The article tries to raise valid points, but ultimately, they don't change my opinion of this dreadful game.

1984d ago 10 agree4 disagreeView comment

I guess Activision realized that, in some way, this would cost them money.

1984d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

They don't. Gameplay is first and foremost, IMO. Graphics are just a delightful bonus. Example: CS 1.6 - bad graphics (I think they're good, but generally people don't liken to them well) but exceptional gameplay.

1985d ago 30 agree6 disagreeView comment

As long as it's NOTHING like Conviction and anything like Pandora Tomorrow, I'm in.

1985d ago 10 agree4 disagreeView comment

They are called PREMIUM, they feature damage, higher polygon count models, they have cockpit camera. Yes, I would.

1985d ago 4 agree34 disagreeView comment

Seriously, the standard cars are a BONUS, the premium cars are the real meat and potatoes. But you know, whatever, just be an ignorant troll.

P.S: You can turn on AA via the options. Again, just plain ignorance.

1985d ago 5 agree40 disagreeView comment

I guess a lot of Kinect games and a couple of proper 360 worthy exclusives.

1985d ago 13 agree2 disagreeView comment

I cracked and went for New Vegas. It was okay, though definitely buggy. Won't make the same mistake again.

1986d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Oh boo hoo, this kiddie wanted to ram his cars into walls over and over without consequence. It's a sim. You don't want to be crashing into walls - this is a penalty.

1986d ago 38 agree2 disagreeView comment

I wouldn't mind the at least trying. I know IGN probably only got to level 5-6 then said "screw it", we've seen what GT has to offer. Let's throw in our 2cents.

1986d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

A lot of you guys are idiots. The 800+ cars are a bonus. The 200 premium models are what GT5 is really about. They're absolutely stunning.

1986d ago 13 agree2 disagreeView comment

Has actually thorougly impressed me. Seems to me that all the reviewers are Burnout fans because all they complain about is damage.

1987d ago 19 agree2 disagreeView comment

For a troll, I don't know how you managed to get so much bubbles.

1987d ago 7 agree4 disagreeView comment

They're clearly testing the water with the damage. Frankly, I'm content the way it is. I didn't buy all the other GTs to crash expensive cars into walls at ridiculous speeds to see the outcome. I play GT as it's a simulation. If you have a decent wheel, then you'll know damage, extreme damage, is an annoyance after a while.

Do you want damage akin to real life where you hit a wall at 30 MPH and have the chance of writing off the car? I don't. If you wa...

1987d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

Wow, so only after you buy Black Ops do you realize how rubbish it is? Last CoD I got was WaW.

1987d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Only part where FPS dipped for me is when you smash walls and there is a lot of smoke effects on screen. But the dip only lasts a second, barely noticable.

1987d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wow, to be put off a game by the VA's. How shallow are you? I for one didn't mind the VA.

1987d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Gee, is this guy trolling? It's simply too hard to tell (!)

1987d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

I, too, am Scottish. Did you know it was a Scotsman that help found the Mitsubishi corp.?

1987d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'd rather have a real gamers unbiased, non-trolling opinion review over a site that gives a game a disgustingly high score when they are being paid through every orifice to promote the game on their website.

1987d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment