CRank: 5Score: 0

Exposing Sony's lies, hypocrisy, spin etc...

It is a well known fact many diehard fans of the PS3 are not well informed and see SCE as a charity and not a business. This blog is dedicated to exposing the hypocrisy, lies, truth, "spin" and arrogance of SCE and proving that they are in fact a business.

Many fans believe that the universal trophy system available on the PlayStation 3 was not influenced, based on or copied from Microsoft's "achievement" system on the Xbox 360. This is in fact false. In 2006 Sony were posed with the question "Will you be implementing an achievement system similar to the Xbox 360 on the PS3?" just before the PS3s launch. This was Sony's response: "The short answer: no"

Read the full interview in the link. Sony had no interest in implementing a universal achievement like system on the PS3. In my opinion, that was until achievements became the deciding factor for many multi-console owners when it came to multiplatform games. And relying on developers to implement them into their own games just wasn't working out.

Some fans are still completely unaware as to why the Sixaxis had no "rumble" feedback. I remember reading all kinds of "spin" to justify the complete lack of rumble feedback in the Sixaxis which was even present in ALL last-gen controllers, spin such as this:

"Vibration in the Sixaxis would screw up the motion sensor"
"I don't even notice the lack of vibration"
"I'd take the motion controls over rumble"
"Rumble is a last generation feature"

The last quote is actually a quote from SCE themselves: "I believe that the Sixaxis controller offers game designers and developers far more opportunity for future innovation than rumble ever did. Now, rumble I think was the last generation feature; it's not the next-generation feature."

The real reason the Sixaxis had no "rumble" and was later discontinued in favor of the DS3, was because Sony were being sued by the company Immersion over patent rights. Sony lost to the tune of about $90 million. Sony insisted [at the time] that the lawsuit had nothing to do with why the Sixaxis was lacking "rumble", something we now know was a lie as the DS3 was announced shortly after the lawsuit settlement.

Sony's shady "BUSINESS" practices don't stop there though, read:

This by far is the biggest load of BS being spewed out by Sony and it's fans alike. If you are one of those people that believe Sony didn't pay Konami for MGS4, Square Enix for FF13 to be a timed-exclusive in Japan and Rockstar for Agent, then you are sorely mistaken.

A quote from SCEA on losing GTAIV: "It's just a question of how deep into your pockets do you have to reach to secure [exclusivity]? Desperation breeds deep pockets. Confidence breeds the opposite. When it makes sense, you do the deal. When it doesn't, you pass."

Further proof of Sony paying for exclusives like MGS4 could be the fact that MGO uses Konami's own in store purchases, servers, online ID and registration process completely separate from the PSN. No other game, exclusive or multiplatform offers anything similar, a sacrifice Sony had to make to "do the deal".

This of course is only fiction, there is no concrete proof Sony paid for the above games like there is for M$ paying $50 million for DLC. However, take a look at this quote from Sony in 2007: "We have a very different approach to exclusives than some of our competitors," he continued. "We don't buy exclusivity. We don't fund development. We don't, for lack of a better term, bribe somebody to only do a game on our platform."

Now take a look at this from 2009 titled "Sony Will Pay Devs for PSN Exclusivity": "Sony has declared a willingness to back up its aspirations for exclusive content with cold, hard cash. Its Pub Fund, just announced today, will match developer funding for exclusive games headed to the PSN."

I'm not sure if many of you are aware or even care that Sony has blacklisted Kotaku. Those of you who are aware and believe that Kotaku were blacklisted due to their "pro-360 and anti-PS3" stance, you would actually be wrong. According to Kotaku, Sony "blackballed" them for leaking info about Playstation Home which Kotaku labelled as a rumor, effectively trying to silence them.

The only reason I brought up Kotaku is because these are not the practices of a charity but of a business looking out for it's own interests.

This blog is getting a little long, so I will end it here (for now). I'll leave you with a little bedtime reading:

And a little comedy from Sony's 2005 E3 press conference: [1/3] [2/3] [3/3]

The story is too old to be commented.
ubiquitious2949d ago

But all big corporations lie. You could also write a blog about Microsoft`s lies and Nintendo`s lies.

SONY however, takes the cake. The thing is though they have their consumer base more or less brain-washed into believing anything they say. I remember back in 2007 when most PS3 fans had not even purchased PS3`s yet! They were just jumping on the bandwagon because they had a crazed affection for their PS2`s.

But this all means nothing to the public a.k.a. the non-hardcore. SONY was king last gen and it is an incredible sight to see how the mighty fall. The reality is, their console and their handheld is in last place.

Stop the lies SONY.


A Sony fan since the Playstation days

IRetrouk2949d ago

oh my days, lol you moan like sony havnt given you the best console out of the three or provided some of the best games this gen, get over yourself lol.

AndrewRyan2940d ago

That is not the point you idiot. He is simply proving people wrong who believe SONY don't care about money and only care about the customer. He could do the same thing with Microsoft and Nintendo. Infact, if you really think big companies care about you, you should kill yourself for being a complete moron.

JakemanPS319942937d ago

he could but he wont! this guy is a sony hater who just trolls ps3 articles and makes sony fan hating blogs.

Godmars2902948d ago

So, why is the whole thing over vibration proof absolute that Sony is "evil?" How is it that its become this no-win argument?

They along with MS and Nintendo ripped of the tech, Sony was the only one stupid enough not to settle. They lose and are forced to remove the tech, which in no way shape or form forces them to take the PR that it wasn't "necessary." They do manage to settle and reintroduce the tech, but are forever branded for scoffing at it in the first place. Nevermind the reason.


Let's also see Sony going back on the statement of never buying exclusives as some wholly original dastardly plot and not as a countermeasure to MS's been doing since coming into the indusrty.

Cenobia2948d ago

This reads like a crazy conspiracy theory and the picture you used makes me think you inappropriately used a sarcastic image or genuinely think the PS3 is to blame for everything.

You are commenting on PR spin, which all companies do. You fail, however, to comment on WHY people think of Sony as a better company, or "charity" as you put it. It's because they have changed to meet the demands of their consumers.

They said they didn't need rumble, people bitched, AND THEY PUT IT BACK IN. They said they didn't need achievements, people wanted them, AND THEY ADDED IT.

MS is considerably more evil than Sony when you compare them. They are both companies and are in it for the profit, but it is painfully obvious in MS' case. HDD that are proprietary and double the price, XBL gold price hikes even in the face of PSN competition, and paying millions of dollars for exclusive DLC and peripheral marketing rather than establishing their own first parties.

Sony at least contributes to gaming by making great first party games. After XBL, the MS contribution has become almost non-existent.

Pennywise2948d ago

Now do one for MS you paid shill.

You can concentrate on Microsofts shady XBOX dealings and not ALL of the company's hypocritical dealings. (Thats just to make it easier on you to fit into one blog.)

Show all comments (14)
The story is too old to be commented.