crxss (User)

  • Contributor
  • 5 bubbles
  • 6 in CRank
  • Score: 61400
""

All In For...

crxss | 333d ago
User blog

With the end of TGS looming, everything's on the table for two of the Big Three coming out with next-gen consoles by the end of the year. The most we'll get from either Sony or Microsoft now would be a simple policy explanation via twitter or short interviews but nothing that would dramatically shift the opinion in a consumer's mind. So, has everyone who is planning on purchasing a console by the end of the year settled in their respective camps ready to go? Or are there those still stuck in limbo unable to decide on which one to purchase? As a person who works in the game industry (vague I know), but more importantly as an unbiased consumer, I'm going with the PS4 in 2013. Here's my story of all that's led up to my decision.

I'll be honest with you guys, I love my 360. Ever since Microsoft introduced the Xbox 360 S I placed a lot of my chips at Microsoft's camp. I'm a big fan of hardware, and the 360 S was a big step in the right direction for Xbox fans. It also didn't hurt my faith in Microsoft when Sony kept releasing a newer and uglier PS3 each time. Here's what Sony was thinking, "Let's cut costs and make the PS3 Slim look as cheap and ugly as possible". As a Sony fan that irritated me. I was a big fan of the original George Foreman Grill-esque 60 GB PS3. A little about me, I've owned a total of 3 Xbox 360s and 2 PS3s. When the 360 S was announced, here I thought I could finally trade-in my, what now appeared to be (thanks marketing brain), fat Xbox 360 and no longer fear the inevitable RROD; the basis for trading in my original 20 GB and Elite 120 GB. Sure I had the 360 Elite edition with the smaller less power hungry Jasper chipset compared to the original Xenon, but with the same console appearance my fear still lingered. And then I heard the 360 S would have a 45 nm combined CPU and GPU along with even less power consumption and my fears vanished! I could own this 360 until the NeXbox, the 720, err I mean the One.

So in February 2013, the leaks happened ( http://bit.ly/X0i24h http://bit.ly/V5NUUA). That's when things such as mandatory Kinect, DDR3 RAM, "always on", and new DRM happened. What were you thinking Microsoft? If anything, these leaks benefited Sony tremendously (main reason for the boost to 8 GB in the PS4?). When a console is announced, the design and games usually accompany it. So in the case of this leak, you could really only pay attention to its specs and policies. Boy was "Durango" disappointing. On the other hand I was really only disappointed by the 4 GB of RAM in the "Orbis". Like any relationship, there should always be more than one reason for ending it (look now I'm giving relationship advice) and this was the first draw. But I was still going into the next-gen with an open mind.

Then Sony came back knocking on my door with their pre-E3 conference. "Remember me?" she said ( http://bit.ly/1gOfj4h). Let me start off by saying that I love my PS3 as well, but once my 60 GB died on me, she became a little less appealing (being all matte and ugly). She still had the games though! During the conference Sony was saying all the right things: 8 GB GDDR5 RAM, developer friendly, social features, and the DualShock 4! More info about me, I'm really critical when it comes to design, in case you couldn't tell before. When Sony announced the DS4, I was a little skeptical. In my opinion, the 360 Controller is superior over the DualShock 3, especially when it comes to the triggers. And one of the first things you notice on the DS4 are the new triggers! I was excited, but if they felt anything like the DualShock 3 triggers that would be a deal breaker. Design and functionality, I'm super critical about it. I got my first hands on the DS4 at E3, but more on that later. Sony was doing everything right, especially when it came to announcing games. Destiny, Watch Dogs, Infamous: Second Son, Deep Down, Final Fantasy, etc., they all looked great! Getting the jump on E3 created a lot of excitement for Sony and I was readying my seat to bring to Sony's camp ready to purchase a PS4.

Responding to Sony's conference, Microsoft held their own pre-E3 conference. From the confirmation of mandatory Kinect, "always on", focus on TV, and even the fake applause by Microsoft employeees ( http://bit.ly/10jspT3), nothing was going right for Microsoft (the negative press didn't help either). I actually didn't mind the mandatory Kinect or "always on" so much at first. Sure lugging around my Kinect with the Xbox One would be a pain but it wasn't a deal breaker (I do remember forgetting to bring a necessary cable to a LAN on occasion as a kid). "Always on" was a slightly bigger pain but most of the games I play on 360 are online games. I figured I'd just be playing a lot of Halo (though I do enjoy the single player campaign of Halo games). I guess I was being positive and optimistic. The more I thought about it though the more I began to really dislike those policies. Then almost as quick as they were announced, Microsoft took away those annoyances but at the cost of one of the One's greatest features, digital game sharing. Hope that makes a comeback soon. To be honest, all of those problems I had with the Xbox One were overshadowed by one thing, the console itself. It looked HUGE! Plus the fact that it couldn't stand vertical seemed like a step backwards. I stand all my consoles vertically, even if I have to buy a separate stand (looking at you Sony!). Did I mention I'm a design freak? The controller on the other hand looked alright but I was really digging the idea of putting rumble inside of the triggers, impulse triggers they called it. I believe the design of a controller has a greater importance than the design of a console, especially since I place my consoles behind my TV. So my eye began to wander, what were these so-called impulse triggers like?

June finally comes around, felt like forever with all the pre-E3 news (heck even Nintendo had their pre-E3 conference online). E3 2013 was only the second time I attended the conference. Getting hands-on the Xbox One and the PlayStation 4 was unreal. As a kid I always looked to others with envy as they would attend E3 getting their hands on the latest tech. Thankfully there were journalists who would share their thoughts about it (shoutout to magazines and online websites!). Now I had finally made it to E3 with my name on the badge (sounds like another post in the making)! There weren't many hands on demos but getting a grip on the controllers was enough for me. Both controllers had their positives and negatives. For the Xbox One it was mainly the bumpers. Microsoft somehow made them worse, which doesn't make sense at all. With the One's controller handles slightly more angled inwards and the bumpers being more slanted than the 360 controller, pressing the bumpers felt more difficult. On Sony's side, the DS4 touchpad was disappointing. I was expecting nice clicking feedback similar to a mouse trackpad, but there was hardly any resistance when pressing it and practically no sound feedback. You may call it being picky, I call it having a high attention to detail (haha). Overall, I fell in love with the triggers on both controllers, especially the impulse triggers on the Xbox One controller. The feedback it gave during the tech demos felt unreal. Feeling the brakes being applied on a car was cool and innovative but I'd personally appreciate that kind of quality haptic feedback in a gun. The gattling gun in their tech demo felt bland and gimmicky. It's really in the hand of the developers to utilize it well. But did the trigger rumble warrant a purchase of an Xbox One over a PS4? Definitely not, especially since the DS4 triggers are also a major improvement over the DualShock 3 (Sony claims the rumble has been improved in the DS4 but none of the demos I played had it).

As you all know, Sony used E3 to present the console itself. Being the critic I am, my first thoughts were: why is it slanted? I understand how it looks cool and unique but if only the back was and the front wasn't it would still be unique. This probably wont happen, but there could be an issue with the disc slot on the PS4 due to the slanted design and indented disc slot. When the PS3 ejects a disc, the disc pops out just enough to reveal around two-thirds of the center ring of the disc. I don't know about you guys, but I use my index finger in the middle of the disc when I grab a disc out of the PS3. With the disc slot being covered by a centimeter or so, if the disc doesn't eject far enough it could get annoying. It's weird that I think about these things, but hey Steve Jobs did it ( http://nyr.kr/ogF1Xy)! Anyway I'm sure (almost positive) Sony is aware of this and will just eject the disc a bit further, problem solved! Wow I got a bit off topic there. You can tell by now I have my quibbles about the PS4 design but in no way is it as poor as the Xbox One's in my opinion.

Finally the biggest impact to my decision, practically making all other factors irrelevant (sorry for wasting your time), are the games! Microsoft definitely redeemed itself at E3 with its games lineup. I'm one of the people who's in love with Titanfall. After seeing Respawn's Titanfall presentation I knew that was going to be my "Best Game of E3". I'm a big fan of mobility in shooters. Though seeing how Titanfall is being published by EA and has zero lasting ties to Microsoft that I can see, I fully expect it to eventually release on the PS4. There's also Halo which I'm a sucker for (I blame my friends). Those are really the only two games I'm interested in on the Xbox One. Games like Below, D4, and Quantum Break all look very intriguing but aren't enough to merit a purchase like Mass Effect 1 did for me with 360. For me, game series like Uncharted and The Last of Us which are inevitably coming out for the PS4 as exclusives are must purchases for one (not One). I might be able to survive without Halo 5, maybe.

The next-gen systems are so similar, especially in specs, it's hard to choose one over another without looking directly at the games. With the release of the current gen it was easy (at least easier) to argue one system over another based on things such as Blu-ray vs HD DVD, WiFi, HDD, HDMI, etc.. Games will have an even greater importance for the next-gen than it does for the current-gen (exclusive games and comparing multi-platform games). It appears the "winning" factor for the next-gen outside of games lie in either TV and/or social features (or maybe something currently unknown). Only time will tell.

crxss  +   333d ago
it can be dun!

Related image(s)
#1 (Edited 333d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Tetsujin  +   333d ago
My $ is going to the PS4 mainly because Sony talked about how the hardware works for gaming; not the other way around like MS did. The games also reminded me of how the PS1/2 was back during their reveals, and Sony is actually trying to go back in the right direction with devs and gamers and not just one side or the other.

For me to purchase the new Xbox MS will have to do some heavy convincing game-wise to really get me to try their console. Dead Rising 3 and Ryse look good and fun to play, however I need something different, and at least an attempt at some older, forgotten genres.
maniacmayhem  +   333d ago
Interesting, because for it's your exact same reasons but for the Xbox One.

In my opinion Sony's launch games have a definite been there done that feel. Xbox though seems to be providing the variety and difference that is very appealing to me.

But I am personally going to wait a while before I purchase any new system. I made the mistake of getting all three at near the same time. Can't afford it at this stage of my life.
GinkgoID  +   332d ago
I really don't understand why anyone would buy a console based off the launch titles?! A console will be with you for years (presumably) not just the launch window.

Surely looking at exclusives launched throughout the whole life-cycle of current gen is a better guide for which camp makes the games that appeal to you most.
#2.1.1 (Edited 332d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(1) | Report
XboxFun  +   331d ago
I agree Maniac,

The variety is definitely in MS court for the launch titles. And with other titles like D4, Below and Quantum Break around the corner I can see MS continuing providing different games for it's system.
Imalwaysright  +   330d ago
What GinkgoID said. 1st party devs are much more important than a few launch games.
crxss  +   330d ago
@above guys

If titanfall was a launch game and had no chance of arriving on ps4 would you get an xbox one? I probably would.
#2.1.4 (Edited 330d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
Software_Lover  +   332d ago
What launch games from Sony are "different"?
Software_Lover  +   332d ago
They both look great to me. I love the interface for the XBone. Highly customizable. I love the snap features and instant gaming. I like that Sony is bringing all the F2P games to their console. I wish them both well.
crxss  +   332d ago
same. knowing microsoft, their xbox one interface will go through changes just like 360's did. i don't mind the current look of the interface but i'm hoping they allow you to switch the background similar to windows 8.1 or have a live background.

sony's interface looks more appealing to me though especially with the live feed. hoping it's customizable so i can focus on relevant updates from friends and ignore some friend's news
emcarpenter  +   332d ago
the solution: buy both!
crxss  +   332d ago
problem': empty wallet
TheRealHeisenberg  +   332d ago
the solution #2: Get a second job. Lol, according to Sony people should have wanted to do it for PS3. Why not these two?

I'm getting both but the PS4 will be first.
#4.1.1 (Edited 332d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
FamilyGuy  +   332d ago
Hey you're a really good writer! I like how this was more of a story to read rather than just a simple explanation.

I've been a Sony fan since the first PS1, when the February conference came I was beyond sold already. Everything they mentioned and showed had me on the edge of my seat with eager anticipation for the next generation of gaming to start. So many of their announced features were huge improvements over the things we see today on current gen systems that it was beyond what I expected.

For MS I wanted to be wow'd, I wanted them to show me something truly impressive that would make me consider their console. Unfortunately Sony had already shown many of the features that the X1 would have. Through their first showing and then E3 the only thing that really grabbed my attention was Titanfall and "300,000 dedicated servers". There were lots of other nice features and games but none that really made me feel like I'd be missing out on something if I didn't get an X1.

As time passed, through system spec comparisons, price comparisons, unique and exclusive games, services and whatever else I've only been pushed more in Sonys direction. They're both going to be really nice but when compared to each other the PS4 just has greater appeal, hands down.
#5 (Edited 332d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
crxss  +   332d ago
THANKS :)

Titanfall and "300,000" dedicated servers really grabbed my attention as well! Both consoles are really great but for me Sony's the way to go, at least for 2013. If Microsoft makes a deal with EA and grabs Titanfall exclusivity I might have to pick one up to experience that, or just buy a really good PC. I think it was E3 that really finalized my decision to go with Sony (at least on Day 1), I'm really looking forward to all their social features and the overall speed of the system.
ZHZ90  +   332d ago
That was a nice blog.

You gave me more hope that PS4 will be great including about improved DS4 triggers.

Thanks.
kewlkat007  +   332d ago
Dedicated server support/infrastructure will be a HUGE factor....

People are forgetting all the little things..
colonel179  +   331d ago
Sony might not have diversity on their launch line up. Actually, they are only releasing four titles, which could be disappointing for some people if they only want to play first party games. However, Sony has the big advantage over Microsoft in the long term. Sony knows how to manage its first party developers to deliver games constantly, and they have yet to unveil games from most of their teams (Santa Monica, Naughty Dog, Guerrilla, San Diego, Quantic Dream, Media Molecule, etc). On the other hand, Microsoft is showing every single game they have, which makes it excellent for people looking to play a lot of games at launch, but what will Microsoft have afterwards? Also, Sony is filling the gaps with indie titles, so that you have something to play while waiting for their next AAA title, or at least one you like, and they do have a lot of indies going PS4 only (console wise).

In my opinion, Microsoft is risking a long term line up just to say that they have a better launch line up. I could be wrong because I obviously don't know what they are working on, but that's the impression that they are showing. In the end though, since both consoles release practically at the same time, it will be down to which console proves more value (independent of price) , which console is on the store shelf, and which console has the better games for you, the buyer.
memots  +   330d ago
I think Sony need to move some of the later Ps3 games to ps4.
I have friend who ps3 just died and he wants TLOU and Puppeteer he will not get a new ps3 and is waiting for ps4.

I think they need to move some of those digital to work on the ps4, More software sales and more software available to people who get a ps4.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember