Tekken 6 - 2 PS3 vs 360 comparison galleries (Blur mode on vs Blur mode off)

Wakka_ - 38 days 14 hours ago

Slightly better? How disappointing with the cell and all.

Agree(8) | Disagree(51) | Report

gaffyh - 38 days 14 hours ago

Looks exactly the same, except for the colours. The PS3 version seems to have deeper colours, both versions seem jaggy as hell though.

Agree(18) | Disagree(1) | Report

Parapraxis - 38 days 14 hours ago

Wakka...are you slightly bitter? How disappointing with your troll skills and all.

Agree(24) | Disagree(2) | Report

Saaking - 38 days 14 hours ago

They look almost exactly the same. Maybe the PS3 version looks a little bit better, but overall it should be great on both consoles.

Agree(6) | Disagree(3) | Report

umair_s51 - 38 days 13 hours ago

I feel it got scaled back for 360

Agree(9) | Disagree(6) | Report

Skizelli - 38 days 13 hours ago

I haven't been impressed with a Tekken game on console since Tekken 3 on PSX.

Still not impressed.

Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report

aliveinboston - 38 days 12 hours ago

The 360 version doesnt have as many smooth transitions between light and dark and less definition in shadowed and lit areas. This could be for a number of reasons including the way the images were captured.

Either way it's an extremely ugly game and should not be taken as a reflection of either machine's capabilties.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

commodore64 - 38 days 10 hours ago

Isn't that weird?

- The article states that the 360 renders at 768p, then scales this output BACK to 720p, but without AA
- The article states that the ps3 renders at 576p, but with AA.
- The author then (subjectively) states that 576p (with AA) looks better than 768p (without AA).

Personally, I can't tell the difference, graphically, however loading times are much worse on ps3, as shown in the recent LOT article:
http://www.lensoftruth.com/... but this is beside the issue at hand.

I am just reminded that this phenomenon of reduced resolution, is exactly what happened to Halo3, which was reduced from 720p to 640p to accommodate visual effects like HDR lighting and other visual game enhancing features.

At the time, fanboys jumped on the 'sub-HD' Halo3 resolution bandwagon with derision and negativity, even though the net effect was to arguably improve the game.

It's weird that the same derisive fanboys are not jumping on exactly the same situation for ps3 tekken6, which is being forced to run at a lower resolution to include AA.

Who can respond intelligently to my observation?

Agree(3) | Disagree(8) | Report

Zeevious - 38 days 6 hours ago

I'm just not going to.

.

Trust what looks best to your eyes.
Photoshop counts pixels. Gamers don't.

(sys 64738)

Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report

commodore64 - 38 days 5 hours ago

lol.... sys 64738!

That's the commodore64 system reset command...
I even remember using it!
http://www.c64-wiki.com/ind...

In any case, I'm a gamer AND I count pixels.
What do you make of that?
Doesn't compute, huh?
http://bashish.sourceforge....

Funny how I made a valid observation and garnered multiple disagrees, yet did not elicit a single intelligent response?

Gotta love N4g!

Agree(2) | Disagree(4) | Report

Soda Popinsky - 38 days 4 hours ago

Hey now! They said in the article that the PS3 version looks slightly better. Who are we to question their opinion? They must be telling the truth since they are journalists, right? This started off as a pro PS3 cheerleading contest. Don't spoil the fun with facts.

Agree(1) | Disagree(5) | Report

commodore64 - 38 days 3 hours ago

Lol!

Sorry Soda.
I'll shut up now, then.
;)

No-one seems to like it when I point out the facts.
----------------------------- ----------------------
edit @ below:
whut? 'hi-fi'? .... um.. whut?

Oh, wait... you mean 'high five', right?
lol.

Agree(2) | Disagree(6) | Report

jpdcmo - 38 days 1 hour ago

They look the same but the ps3 version wins because the controller its better for this type of game.
I have both ps3 and xbox360 and i have trouble to chose the version i like to buy but i finally chose the xbox360 only because i have much more friends in live than psn.

Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report

rockleex - 36 days 20 hours ago

"Wah wah wah wah!!!"

Crybabies.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

ULTIMATE_REVENGE - 38 days 15 hours ago

http://www.gameswire.net/co...

Notice how the PS3 version has more vibrant colour. The green grass and the face details are more sharper

Its the last two pictures if you cant access the link

Agree(4) | Disagree(3) | Report

Unending Punishment - 38 days 14 hours ago

PS3 really isn't all that much more powerful than Xbox 360, it still has to squeeze everything into 256MB of system memory. And anyway multiplatform games usually have a uniform set of specs to measure up to, and whatever can't work out on one version will be culled.

edit: XDR world's fastest? incorrect, Xenos' 10MB eDRAM "intelligent memory" provides 10x the bandwidth.

And um, RSX's 256MB is dedicated to RSX. Developer's can't bypass FlexIO to get to RSX's memory, CellBE is tied to its memory.

PS3: 256MB XDR + 256 MB GDDR3
Xbox 360: 512MB GDDR3 + 10MB eDRAM

Agree(4) | Disagree(28) | Report

FailureRate54 - 38 days 14 hours ago

No
PS3 = 256 DDR3 + 256 XDR (World fastest memory)
360 = Unified 512 DDR3

Also, did you ever see UC2 / KZ2 / GT5 / Heav Rain /GoW 3 / MGS4-like graphic? No!
did you ever see a game that wasn't limited to 9GB due to outdated DVD format? No!

So..
gtamike123 post is correct...

edit:

You stupid

Cell CAN use RSX's DDR3 Memory and RSX CAN use Cell's XDR Memory

GO READ CELL ARCHITECTURE!

Agree(9) | Disagree(11) | Report

Ocelot525 - 38 days 14 hours ago

@FailureRate54

ddr3 ain't the same as gddr3

Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report

FailureRate54 - 38 days 14 hours ago

Yep i forgot the G

Anyway, we can even say that they are the same since only operative voltage change.

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

OpenGL - 38 days 13 hours ago

@ Ocelot525

The G stands for graphics, as in memory designated for the GPU.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

FailureRate54 - 38 days 14 hours ago

But of course, since it has WORSE graphic.

Load sh!t is way faster than load a very beautiful game.

Agree(15) | Disagree(8) | Report

Anorexorcist - 38 days 14 hours ago

Dude you have to remember that the PS3-Cynicists like Wakka don't have the kind of parents who grant them a 5-week advance on their allowance to purchase a Playstation 3. So they'll naturally degrade what they can't indulge.

@ Wakka: BTW, Wakka was probably the most annoying character in FFX. If you want to be recognized, take the avatar and account name of a cool FFX character like Auron or Kimarhri (however the hell you spell it!!!)

Agree(8) | Disagree(3) | Report

The Tour Man - 38 days 14 hours ago

i believe u meant to say 'BS' instead of 'fact'. i understand that you're a xbox fanboy, but at least try not to get those two words mixed up.

Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report

ia_studio - 38 days 13 hours ago

@failure rate, I'm on the ps3 side, but this is ridiculous the games look the same, anyways if there's installation in the ps3 there's faster loading.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

commodore64 - 38 days 9 hours ago

@ iastudio

No dude, that's wrong.
Even when you install the game to the PS3 HDD, it still runs slower than the game running straight off the disc on the 360.

As a ps3 owner and fan, I was extremely disappointed to hear this.

Read:
http://www.lensoftruth.com/...

Agree(0) | Disagree(4) | Report

darkride66 - 38 days 6 hours ago

We're talking mere seconds difference. If they had just made the install mandatory, the difference wouldn't even be worth noting. Just install it on your harddrive.

We know why the PS3 version loads slower, because it's a better version with higher bitrate. Eurogamer pointed out that the 360 version of the game had far less bandwidth on the DVD for video compared to the PS3 version which hampered load times due to better quality. Not only did the 360 version receive lower quality visuals (according to Eurogamer) but also the framerate on the PS3 was upped to 60 fps versus the 360's 30 fps on all the video.

So the PS3 version looks better, video is higher quality, controller is better suited and at the cost of a harddrive install and at the worst 1.7 seconds difference in load times according to LOT?

This is just nitpicking, in my opinion.

Agree(3) | Disagree(2) | Report

commodore64 - 38 days 4 hours ago

Darkride66.

1. You have stated you are not cyber-stalking my posts, yet here you are, evidently cyber-stalking my posts!

2. You misquoted (Eurogamer) again when you said:
"...also the framerate on the PS3 was upped to 60 fps versus the 360's 30 fps on ALL the video."

Eurogamer actually said:
"on SOME of the videos (for example the Tekken timeline recap at the beginning of Scenario Mode), frame-rate has been upped from 30FPS on 360 up to 60FPS on PS3."

I have asked you to stop lying
I have asked you to stop misquoting
I have asked you to pay attention to detail, so I need not correct you constantly.
I have also asked you to stop cyber-stalking me.

yet, you seem incapable of doing this.
what is going wrong, darkride66?
... Did I upset you?
... is this theme a recurring pattern in your life?

I can help you, if you like, with these somewhat obsessive issues you are exhibiting.
All you need to do is ask, my dearest of all gaming friends!

Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report

darkride66 - 37 days 19 hours ago

Sorry. The PS3 is 60fps SOME OF THE TIME, while the 360 is 30fps ALL OF THE TIME.

That distinction doesn't do a thing to my point. And you never even addressed the fact that we're talking about a mere 1.7 seconds difference here. In fact, you can install the 6.7 gb 360 version to the hard disk and it doesn't improve anything, at all.

Figures that again you'd try to twist the meaning of what I said to make it something it's not. My point is still valid and still stands despite your repeated attempts at name-calling and slander. Keep it up, Mr. Dam.

Answer me this, how does your anal attention to detail do anything to refute my point? From now on, should I only quote an article if I cut and past the quote? Oh wait, I've done that in the past and provided links and you've still accused me of lying because of something the same articles says later on.

I have no issue with you pointing out when you see a discrepancy in my statement. I'm only human. However I would ask you to remain civil in these forums. Need I pull out your laundry list of offences in the past again? Mr. "100% of PS3 multiplats are gimped"?

Edit: I've reported you to the mods for your continued harassment. There's a difference between disagreeing with a member and the harassment and continued name calling you're engaged in.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

FailureRate54 - 38 days 14 hours ago

Are you blind?

Agree(2) | Disagree(4) | Report

kraze07 - 38 days 14 hours ago

I'm guessing you haven't seen the game first hand.

Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report

ReBurn - 38 days 10 hours ago

Let me show you to the Open Zone. It's that way. -->

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Dannehkins - 38 days 15 hours ago

Is a sense of maturity beyond you? It seems to be judging from your username and I really fail to see how anyone could take your opinions seriously.

Sorry, but a name like 'ps3hasnogames' is just a bit pathetic.

Agree(14) | Disagree(1) | Report

FailureRate54 - 38 days 14 hours ago

Bttter Anti-Aliasing??

Are you stupid??

On PS3 Version if you disable the Blur, image will recive a 2xAA, XFLOP VERSION NO!

Idiot.

Edit:

Oddly, not what you'd expect. While they do look practically identical (good, considering they use different techniques to reach an end result), the PS3 version looks slightly better in terms of graphical fidelity and detail, despite the 360's resolution boost. Very odd indeed, so the 360 is losing something somewhere.

Idiot? No you are Gaydiot.

Agree(7) | Disagree(1) | Report

gtamike123 - 38 days 15 hours ago

He would reply "err about 4 hours"

Agree(8) | Disagree(0) | Report

Anorexorcist - 38 days 14 hours ago

Here is just some quick advice for you: Don't use the same avatar as one of the biggest idiots on N4G: Shadowman.

You will inherently be ignored and disparaged before you could even say a word if you stick with that same avatar.

Edit: You are already ignored by 18 members???

Nevermind, you might just be that same idiot that I was warning you of.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

wikia - 38 days 12 hours ago

You do know that the Ps3 is the lead console for this game since the arcade board (system 357) is based on the Ps3 so the 360 is the one getting ported.

Gosh do some research next time. Instead of spreading BS.

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

Mista T - 38 days 11 hours ago

your wrong, just look at the definition and shadows around the girl's donk

ps3 and 360 pics are stacked on each other

http://www.gameswire.net/co...

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Obama - 38 days 10 hours ago

The ps3 is obviously better looking even thought the difference is not huge. Delusional bot, I suggest you stop lying along with your fellow delusional bots.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report