Kuma wrote: Every hero has a beginning; either you came from a distant planet or starts off with a dark past. Either way it is your choice on what legacy you want to begin and for Bruce Wayne, it was to be the Dark Knight that Gotham needed. This is the supposed prequel to the other Arkham titles where you take on Gotham as a fresh start Batman against a lot of heavy hitters, but the question that everyone is asking, has Warner Bros Montreal succeeded in this Batman? We shall definitely get into that.
Suicide Squad Kill the Justice League is almost here, but I can't revisit the best Arkhamverse game on PS5 without sacrificing quality.
Not a fan of Orgins. Blame it on the absence of Conroy & Hamill. Blame it on the lack of atmosphere compared to Asylm. Hell blame it the devs thst dicked over Wii U owners like me that purchased the game only for support be dropped as a thank you to me. It's better than Knight but that's not saying much. I don't care for that entry either.
Even though its not the best arkham game in the series, its still an enjoyable game in its own right. What it do really well at though, was the crime investigations scenes. Which imo, were the best of the franchise.
I don’t know about best game but it definitely has the best story and boss fights.
Never played it and recently I've finally tried it via cloud on psn. It's not the best for sure, but it ain't bad either.
Batman: Arkham Origins launched 10 years ago today, and sadly doesn't stand the test of time as well as its predecessors.
I fail to grasp why this title is worse compared to Arkham City (according to the article) as the author didn't provide any argument to explain why aside from that it felt the bigger map compared to Arkham Asylum made the experience less tight.
More importantly, the author seems like he never played Arkham City since he described the game as linear (alongside Asylum).
Despite certain flaws, Batman: Arkham Origins is a splendid entry in the legendary Arkham series and deserves better than being forsaken.
It's the worst of the three in my opinion, but still really enjoyable. Definitely underated and gets far more crap that it deserves.
Should be included with the other Arkham games in the bundle.
I'm honestly enjoying it alot, my first time playing since I just decided to get a Xbox 360 slim for 65$, I cop some other gems too tho, I went into Arkham origins not expecting better than Arkham city but it does deliver plus the guy who voices batman did a good job aiming for the young Bruce impression
Seriously? The game is amazing. The boss fights are incredible, the story is good, gameplay is so diverse and wonderful at the same time, the world is huge, Batman is badass, the graphics are some of the best seen on all platforms and the game scores a 2.5/5?
SMH.
100% garbage review
There just waiting for next gen I think its a shame its not getting the reviews it deserves, I'm really enjoying my copy so far its ridiculous they give this such terrible scores most people love this game on amazon well I give it 9/10 its a great game play it it won't disappoint.
Utterly ridiculous review. Sure, the game doesn't really do anything new, but it does everything as good as (if not better than, in some respects) Arkham City.
At least an 8.5/10. Probably higher.
If you want someone to give you the same drawn out answer with the score that you want, then don't read reviews because obviously opinions are not for you. I broke it down and I expected an interesting prequel take on the dark knight, not all the games are going to be perfect. Sorry to burst your bat bubble kids!