Brady Ruiters from ITF Gaming writes: Shortly before Dead Space 2 was released, I picked up a copy of the first game and found that I could only play it for maybe a few hours at a time before chickening out and playing something else. However, I did manage to finish the game and immediately pre-ordered the sequel. I found it to be more action-oriented but still pretty scary. I enjoyed the series and decided it would be my favourite in terms of a survival horror game. When the third game in the series was announced, I was really excited to take the fight to more Necromorphs, the reanimated corpses created by an alien artefact known as the Marker. Has Visceral Games created a worthy sequel? Let’s find out.
If EA and Motive Studio plan on remaking all the main Dead Space entries, they have to change a lot of what made Dead Space 3 so divisive.
Simple, do not bother with a Dead Space 3 remake. Rather have a new entry for Dead Space.
Remaking 3 would need to be a reworked and somewhat changed remake as 3 was flawed in most peoples eyes and the worst entry.
WTMG's Kyle Nicol:
"Was Dead Space 3 really that bad?
Well, it’s a complicated question. Dead Space 3 is undeniably the weakest of the trilogy. It’s a game that deviates so far from the original formula, that it throws a lot of what made Dead Space special in the first place out of the window. Although, where it does make up for it is one of the best cooperative shooters on the market, even after all this time. Do I recommend playing this game ten years later? Hell yes. But make sure your expectations are in the right place. It has a lot of problems that bring it down."
With the upcoming Dead Space Remake, we replay and rank the original three games.
Dead Space
Dead Space 2
The Callisto Protocol
...
...uhm...
...
...Lost Planet 3?
They need to seriously continue this ip with a new entry. Even if it's just another movie I don't care I love everything about this game.