80°
Submitted by Pozzle 865d ago | opinion piece

Bytes & Flops: Wolfenstein

The buzzworthy reboot/sequel to the classic Wolfenstein franchise fizzled during its original release. Is the sci-fi World War II first-person shooter worth revisiting? 411's Vince Osorio takes a look! (PC, PS3, Wolfenstein, Xbox 360)

wallis  +   865d ago
Lost stealth and seriously suffered from it. Return to castle wolfenstein had a hell of a feeling attached to it - it had a sense of place and time and when I think of it I remember many memorable missions, levels and weapons I all enjoyed.

RTCW was dry and engaged in its own world. It wasn't funny with a self referencing protagonist and it didn't have the lame cliched background characters that seriously drag down Wolfenstein. It's like temple of doom vs. kingdom of the crystal skull. Temple of doom was dark and rooted very clearly in a world and a place with a consistent and well paced atmosphere. Kingdom of the crystal skull takes the same characters and turns them into pg13 versions of themselves.

At the end of the day this is EXACTLY what's wrong with activision. This wasn't an attempt to make a great game it was an attempt to cash in on a franchise. Given to Raven in turn for the freedom to flee captivity the game doesn't use so much as a single bit of new or interesting technology. It pushes no boundaries, plays into CoD like mechanics sprinkled with equally mediocre upgrade systems, the enemies are at times interesting but even then they all seem uninspired in their visual design. (Oh look a nazi with a glowing green skull and a laser gun... hm. A very novel approach to zombie nazi I see). The game even drops stealth in the name of... super powers? In RTCW I had to sneak through bases filled with pissed off nazis just to find a lab filled with mutants that wanted to remove my skull. Well now I can just slow time and forcibly castrate everything in my way.

Uninspired is what screams out at me about wolfenstein. It just pisses me off that the terrible design wound up reflecting badly on Raven (who have shown themselves as capable of making much better games) instead of Activision who quite clearly failed to market the game properly and pushed for such a transparent abuse of IP to made in the first place. It's not that old titles can't continue to lead as examples - RTCW is itself proof of this - it's just that if you treat an IP like nothing but an ATM then of course its not going to be that good. And NO ONE can treat an IP like a worthless piece of crap quite as well as Activision, especially under the direction of Kotick the guy whos name rhymes with dick for a reason.
#1 (Edited 865d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
spektical  +   865d ago
RTCW.. was prolly the first game i was scared to play during the party in the crypts. those things were hard to kill
Rhezin  +   865d ago
i woulda like unt nother volfenshtein yaaaaww

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Ultra-Stylish Black The Fall Is The Second Square Enix Collective Kickstarter

11m ago - Hardcore Gamer: The Square Enix Collective is on fire. First, it helped out Moon Hunters, the inc... | PC
10°

SteelSeries Reveals Their New Siberia Lineup Of Headsets

12m ago - SteelSeries has revealed a new and expanded lineup of headsets to their Siberia line. The sets of... | Tech
20°

Gaming Museum to Revive First Ever MMORPG

16m ago - On Sunday September 28th M.A.D.E (The Museum of Art and Digital Entertainment), hosted a “hackath... | PC
20°

Review: Arcana Heart 3: LOVE MAX!!!! (New Gamer Nation)

18m ago - When it comes to fighting games, the entry level skill is usually high, and it requires countless... | PS3
Ad

Forza Horizon 2 (XB1) Review

Now - Ken takes to the open-road with this Xbox One racer. | Promoted post
20°

Persona 4 Arena Ultimax Review | WGTC

20m ago - Eric from We Got This Covered wrote: Back when Persona 4 Arena was announced in 2011, it seeme... | Xbox 360
Related content from friends