Shane Bell reviews Starhawk: "The Build & Battle is a fresh and new experience in the overly flooded market of Shooters. This gives an ever evolving style of play that makes every match unique."
Great article! I can't begin to say how much I love this game. It's good ol' fashion multiplayer fun just like Warhawk but kicked up a notch. I really hope people give this game a chance.
Once the tournaments start such as ours and MLG's it will really get going
Wheres financial gamer gay ass. Lol trolls love to hate, but this game is awesome ?
Ha ha ha ha! Who the heck is urgent fury?? I mean come on! Oh and here I am with my gay ass
Lol thnks for making your troll presence knwn mam lol. Theres a few 90 plus ratings besides ign by the way. Go play witcher2 or minecraft " oh i can play tht too on my Sony vaio" lol Better yet go play Star Wars Kinect thts a true exclusive jajaja go rate tht and see if ign was paid for tht review. Your colors have been shown your noteven a stealth troll no more,More like Chronos in Gow another old exclusive thts better thn your fav.present day console games lol
Lol, you called it, you knew that troll was lurking!
great fun, I am loving this game, best multiplayer in years yep
Star Hawk is fantastic!
starhawk is BOSS!
Starhawk is a fantastic game and I would give the MP component a solid 9/10 however this urgent fury review ignores a lot of its flaws and is ultimately bias. Urgent fury are running the more significant side of starhawks competitive scene. The more people that buy this game, the more they profit. Thus the biased, and inflated review score. If I were reviewing the game I would give MP a 9 and SP a 6. Maybe a 9 or 8.5 overall because SP doesn't really matter so much, it's built as an MP game.
First there is nothing biased about the review, if it was a biased review, we would not have sat through and played the entire campaign on Mercenary level to see the true colors of the game. Are there a few flaws in the game sure, we covered them and as mentioned if they fixed them it could have been a solid 10. As for your claims of profiting from the game, we are not paid to put together these events nor do we even get paid sponsorships like some. But feel free to put some money in. You are more than welcome to do a review, and it would based on your opinion just like ours is. But thanks for giving insight into how our minds work and that we are making all of this money... I need to go find out where my paycheck is.
Your website is laiden with advertisments, and claims to have sponsors. (left hand side on the main page). Also how are LB going to fix the terrible, not to mention 3hour singleplayer with a patch? either way there are aspects of this game that are an undeniably sub-par experience that simply can't be resolved, and should have contributed to the score. And, profiting or not. Your website probably has intention to ideally be profitable in the future, and even that aside. You / your site made a significant investment of time / effort to the game even prior to release (with the tournament you setup) so obviously you wouldn't be inclined to give it a poor score. Biased or not, you weren't in a position to post a credible review for this game.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.