Starhawk Review | Metro GameCentral

Survival mode is the only time Starhawk comes together to create a properly entertaining whole. In all the other game modes it's merely a loose collection of bullet points and underdeveloped ideas, ones which never gel together into the multiplayer classic this could so easily have been.

The story is too old to be commented.
VonBraunschweigg1720d ago

Sad review. He admits all the elements for online greatness are there, but the games he played - during a beta without filters, clanoptions, experienced players - often lacked the necessary teamwork, therefore all the online matches will be like this, hence a 6 out of 10. I'm afraid he's got a lot of readers and should they be interested in something new online he's not doing them a favour. After 2 years of MAG I know there's plenty of players willing to play a tactical teambased game, with or without mics.

Dante1121720d ago (Edited 1719d ago )

So he rated it down because of how ther a couple of gamers played the game in a few matches he played in? Sounds reasonable. /s

Way to generalize the whole community.

Shadow Flare1719d ago

Um, if nobody is familiar with the metro, it's a free newspaper in the uk and they're "reviews" have been consistantly bollocks for years. They aren't professional reviewers, it's just a guy with a pen.

waltyftm1719d ago

Well said, there review pages do come in handy sometimes, especially if you run out of toilet paper.

PixL1719d ago

Next time Gardener Weekly reviews a game I might find out their score goes to Metacritic.

Gamer30001719d ago (Edited 1719d ago )

i beat you both ..HAHA

IcyEyes1719d ago

I start to wonder if this game is too "complex" for some people ...

I can assure you people, some "reviewer" play the game just few-few hours.

Show all comments (21)
The story is too old to be commented.