200°
Submitted by usedandreviewed 1152d ago | review

PS Vita Angry Birds Review (Vita Mini) - UsednReviewed

You could be waiting a long time for Sony & Rovio to bring a dedicated Angry Birds game to the PS Vita. However, there is a version ready to play today!
UsednReviewed takes a look at the Angry Birds Mini and finds out if it's worth buying or holding out.. (Angry Birds, Casual games, Mobile, PS Vita, PS3, PSP) 7/10

Attached Video
Soldierone  +   1152d ago
I still regret buying it from before....I buy it for the GF and she plays it twice and hasnt touched it since.
WeskerChildReborned  +   1152d ago
To be honest, i think Angry Birds is just overrated. I play barely 2 levels and i'm already bored.
Soldierone  +   1152d ago
I'm the same way. She saw it though and "I want it!" I forgot she switches games on my phone every 10 minutes lol I could have just distracted her and she wouldn't have noticed.
darthv72  +   1152d ago
i got it when it was the chillingo version
then rovio released a newer build and i was stuck at having to repurchase if i wanted the newer build. That is...until I read that i need to contact support to have them give me a code for it.

Still waiting to hear back from support on that one. It isnt bad but this isnt a real vita version anyway. Obviously the vita would have touchscreen support like a tablet. I have played it enough times to almost get all the golden eggs.

Havent played it since getting plants vs zombies from dsiware.
GribbleGrunger  +   1152d ago
idiotic complaints about playing a PSP Mini on the Vita. and then i go into other threads and see people begging for PS1 games on both the PS3 and the Vita... the worlds gone mad i tell you
#1.2 (Edited 1152d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Soldierone  +   1152d ago
How is this an idiotic complaint about PSP Minis? I just said I regret buying Angry Birds on the PS3....
GribbleGrunger  +   1152d ago
if you had reviewed it as a PSP title then i wouldn't have been so dismissive of it. this is like reviewing a PS1 title for the PS3 and complaining about the overall standard of the games on the PS3. this ISN'T a vita title (and i know you point that out) but you decided to review it on the Vita.

it says: 'PS Vita Angry Birds Review (PS Vita Minis) ' and there is no defence for that as far as i'm concerned. that is incorrect and deliberately so. it immediately looks like the official Vita version and you know damn well that most people will simply read the headline and not the article
#1.2.2 (Edited 1152d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report
Soldierone  +   1151d ago
I have absolutely no affiliation with this website at all. lol

I guess it was just a misunderstanding, you have a solid point but your telling it to the wrong person :P
usedandreviewed  +   1151d ago
I'm not sure what your point is. The game is available as a mini for the PS Vita. I have had requests to review this game to see how it translates. I have clearly pointed out that the game isn't a dedicated Vita game and as such does not have the touch controls or great resolution. Other mini games play well and look good on the Vita. This didn't. If people can't be bothered to read the article (or even the description)then we should all give up now.
darthv72  +   1151d ago
it comes down to how it was presented
The title alone is one of the most important factors in deciding to continue reading. Perhaps you were thinking people wouldnt be inclined to read (or watch) if the title was more like:

PS Mini Angry Birds reviewed on Vita. At least that would be more in line with the context of the actual review. Because it really is the PS mini game that is available to psp and ps3 players only being played and reviewed on a vita.

What you did was no different than if someone was reviewing plants vs zombies from the dsiware on a 3ds. Simply put the game is the same if played on a dsi or a dsixl as it would be the 3ds.

Your review happens to be played on the vita so maybe that is the only ps portable you have played it on but in the end it isnt anything special to the vita. Im sure Rovio would like to make more $$$ off the game and will release a "vita only" version. But that is up to them and Sony.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Why everyone should be happy for Final Fantasy VII Remake and Shenmue III

44m ago - Metro: "I cannot get my head around the negativity displayed by some gamers regarding the most re... | PC
40°

Close Up: Metal Gear Solid Premium Package

44m ago - A detailed look at the Japanese Metal Gear Solid Premium Package for Metal Gear Solid on the orig... | Culture
Ad

Visit CGMagazine: The Culture of Games

Now - CGM is for the mature audience of comics and games that wants more out of their media than just a review score. | Promoted post
10°

The Soul Reaver Sword From Legacy of Kain Gets Forged in Real Life

45m ago - EB: The AWE me YouTube channel has posted the latest episode of Man at Arms: Reforged, and this t... | Culture
30°

FFXIV: Heavensward Review Log Part 1 – The First 5 Hours

45m ago - First impressions are everything in this world. In part one of this Final Fantasy XIV: Heavenswar... | PC
30°

R-Type Deluxe In Development for Atari ST, Trumps Original

45m ago - Carl Williams writes, "The Atari ST, and Commodore Amiga, was quite the arcade to home gaming com... | Retro