Submitted by Breadcrab 1304d ago | news

Call of Duty Black Ops 2 Revealed, First Trailer and Details

The cat is out of the bag folks, the next Call of Duty has been revealed to be Black Ops 2. The game will take place about 20 years after the original Black Ops, set in a 21st century Cold War setting. As we’ve seen with the recent pictures on the official site, the game will feature futuristic weaponry, a first for the series. More evidence of this can be seen within the first few screenshots that were leaked earlier today (see below). Call of Duty fans, enjoy the trailer below and you can count on us to be focusing heavily on the campaign for Black Ops 2. (Call of Duty: Black Ops 2, PC, PS3, Xbox 360)

Attached Video
Alternative Sources
« 1 2 3 »
NYC_Gamer  +   1304d ago
That trailer did catch my attention to be honest
Crazyglues  +   1304d ago
I'm sorry to say it, but that engine is looking old as hell now... Wow.. *_*

Can you say dated... I know that won't stop COD fans but I'm going to have to pass..

I mean if you still like it, more power to you I'm not going to hate on your game, but wow I have never seen a new game look so old.

That game engine needs an overhaul bad.. What is Activision thinking.

#1.1 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(77) | Disagree(23) | Report | Reply
Shaman  +   1304d ago
It is dated, but it doesn't look all that bad. Its 60fps game after all...
Winter47th  +   1304d ago
You have to be kidding me with those graphics, 2007 is WAAAY behind us god dammit.

But I do love the setting.

Future Nazi Zombies yay. Gary Oldman should reprise his role as an AI or someshit.
#1.1.2 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(25) | Disagree(3) | Report
HammadTheBeast  +   1304d ago

Tons of games do 60 fps, but Call of Duty is sticking to its dated engine because:

1. It knows it can get money out of people, if the hardcore gamers don't play it, the casuals and kids will.

2. It's an engine that's easy to work with, the Sledgehammer Games president said himself that it's a simpler engine compared to other ones.

3. Why bother? It's been years and it's worked, plus the generation of gaming is too fixed right now to start making a new one, and it would cost them money (barely a dent though) and time.

This engine was great 5 years ago with Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, but at the moment it's mediocre at best compared to others out there.
Shaman  +   1304d ago
Ok...Care to show me other 60fps FPS out there looking better?
-Alpha  +   1304d ago

Though it's nothing like it, Wipeout HD
#1.1.5 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(24) | Disagree(10) | Report
PRHB HYBRiiD  +   1304d ago
True...the graphics in some parts of the trailer look like wii graphics looks closely.
HammadTheBeast  +   1304d ago
@Shaman again:

God of War 3. There. Your argument is rendered completely invalid. With the amount of amazing graphics that God of War can produce, along with all the stuff going on, Call of Duty has no excuses.

More games? Rage. Crysis 2.Forza 4. Hell, even Mario Kart 7. Anything else?

Also look at the explosions and effects. Even in a trailer, everything looks sub par.

I can bet you all $50 that the crane model in the trailer was the same one used in basically half the Call of Duty maps,(Hardhat, Highrise, some other one in CoD 4).

Doesn't mean it's a horrible game. But if they refuse to budge from the gamestyle they usually put in, it will most likely be horible.

The worst part is that they try to make it realistic, instead of using another art style.

Enough said.
GraveLord  +   1304d ago
We got 6-7 year old consoles out there. There really isn't much of a graphics improvement you can do without removing co-op and split-screen features.

The game looks amazing. Stop trolling. Not everything is about graphics.

The settings and story of the game alone means there's so much potential for the most impressive multiplayer yet.
Tachyon_Nova  +   1304d ago
@HammadTheOne, you have no idea what you are talking about. GOW3 runs at 30fps, they initially wanted 60 but couldn't get there. Crysis 2 frequently runs below 30fps, certainly never as high as 60fps on consoles.

To CoD haters, yes the graphics look very dated, but if you really cared about whether or not graphics look dated then you wouldn't have played a console game since 2007.
Lazy_Sunday  +   1304d ago

It's a Treyarch CoD game, Treyarch CoD games play at 'visceral' 60fps, or in layman's terms ~40fps on consoles.
#1.1.10 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(5) | Report
F7U12  +   1304d ago
no thanks I'll be spending my time on ArmA 3, Planetside 2.
vickers500  +   1304d ago

God of War 3 does not run at 60fps - http://www.psxextreme.com/p...
There may be "parts" of the game where it runs at 60fps, but only in the non action, puzzle solving parts, and only some of the time.

RAGE was worked on for freaking ever, in fact I think most of the time they actually spent on that game was making the engine.

Crysis 2 on consoles did NOT have 60fps. http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Forza 4 I can't comment on, I haven't played it, but it's a racing game, racing games tend not to be very resource heavy.

Wipeout HD, read above.

Mario Kart 7 is a cartoony wii game.

Listen, I understand your hatred for Call of Duty, it's 100% deserved, but on some of those you're just outright lying, and on the others, fail to acknowledge the very specific conditions under which a high framerate was possible (racing games not having to handle as much as a multiplayer shooter, WAAYYYYY too much time being spent on an engine).

Now I'm not saying Activision aren't lazy, because they are, and I definitely believe that CoD could look a LITTLE bit better than it does now, but it seems kind of ignorant to assume that it would be easy to make the game look A LOT better, based on other game history (not a lot of 60fps shooters out there that look great).
vickers500  +   1304d ago

Mario Kart 7 is a cartoony "3ds" game.
torchic  +   1304d ago

you're high as hell son. Crysis 2 runs at 30fps, sometimes lower, God of War III runs at a solid 30fps. Rage runs at 60fps but imo looks OKAY, nothing great. mind you this is on console, not PC.

the only notible mention in my honest opinion is Wipeout HD/Fury. I couldn't play that Wipeout on PSVITA because I was so used to the fluidity of the 60fps of HD on PS3.

I don't believe you got that many agrees!
0neShot  +   1304d ago
All these comments about the dated graphics are all idiots. Watch the screen captures in HD and it looks better than recently released games. Bf3 has a new engine but does it look better in consoles compared to this or mw3? absolutely not. Is there any console game out there that is miles better in graphics? No.

It's the hardware stupid, not the engine.
Euthanasia78  +   1303d ago
Ummmm, its dated because it's running on a console from 2005? COD is designed specifically for consoles. It's not a new engine, top of the line PC shooter. Its made for tech that came out 7 years ago. I think it looks fine for current hardware. It's not like it's trying to go against the newest Source engine on PC or something. Its a damn console game, and the consoles are many years old. I'm not saying it doesn't need a new engine, I'm saying it looks fine for this gen of hardware. It's not the best looking, but at 60fps it's not bad. Remember, its running on old tech. What do you expect?
Drake117  +   1303d ago
From that trailer it looks like we will be fighting a sh!t load of drones thats for sure. Like half the scenes had those little things in them.
Electroshocked  +   1303d ago
Someone on YouTube posted a comment stating the following:

''Black ops 2 is like

killzone 3 + BF3 + MW3 + BLACK OPS


He's gotten 39 ''Thumbs Up'' so far. A lot of people that follow the Call of Duty franchise are just pure idiots.

Edit: I mean, I'm sure the game will be an alright game, but to compare it to Killzone 3 alone is ridiculous, let alone to compare it to Killzone 3 and BATTLEFIELD 3.
#1.1.18 (Edited 1303d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(2) | Report
irepbtown  +   1303d ago
I dont like the setting. Never liked 'city' based maps, only if there were a few.

I prefered COD4, real outdoors firefights. Loved the story, loved the online, loved the maps.
All the other CODs have stuck to city based maps and story surrounding these big city's. Which in all honesty, makes it kind of dull.

Imagine if Black Ops 2 was set in maps kind of like the ones in COD4? Then I might consider the game.

Are they depicting this:
Modern Warfare 3 - World war 3??
Black Ops 2 - World war 4??

Did catch my attention but this whole WW story has to come out the building. Something new needs to step in. Unfortunately even BF3's story followed this route, however Multiplayer did make up for the shit Campaign.
#1.1.19 (Edited 1303d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
aCasualGamer  +   1303d ago
Last gen visuals... no thanks.
malol  +   1303d ago
looking at the trailer and reading some comments in here
you guys are so easy to impress its just silly
i mean you cant even get a kid hyped this much for such unimpressive thing like that.
omi25p  +   1304d ago
Really? I thought it looked shocking. The graphics looked awful. The story seems dumb. How Activision can realease the same game 6 years running il never know.

The only way il buy another Cod is if they put it on a new, better looking engine.
#1.2 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(22) | Report | Reply
Chitown71291  +   1304d ago
Guys c'mon be fair. This doesn't look bad. Graphically, yes it does look outdated. But everything else in this trailer looks pretty cool. For $60 , Call of Duty does offer a lot of features . You get single player, multiplayer, coop , zombie mode......and hell its fun with the right maps and surroundings. Modern Warfare 3 tho was just......f*cking horrible. But Treyarch actually look like their tryna bring something new to the table. And I actually like it.........The best COD's this gen, have been Call of Duty 4 and Black Ops......I think Black Ops 2 will deliver. I hope it does because it'll be the first one I'll consider buying since 4.
Biggest  +   1304d ago
Graphically it looks terrible. It also is a misleading trailer (as almost all of the CoD trailers are). How many vehicles and aircraft does one need to see before actually having them available in more than a single sequence? Don't show future tanks and carriers with future jets and stealth bombers if they won't be through out the game. Show the small corridors with camping bad guys because we all know that's what the game will actually have.
ritsuka666  +   1304d ago
OMGF!! Just shut up and take more of my money already Treyarch!
thereapersson  +   1303d ago
People like you are the reason the series continues to wallow in mediocrity.

Activision knows they can sell you CODroneys anything.
Imikida  +   1303d ago
... You're joking right?
#1.3.2 (Edited 1303d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
finbars75  +   1304d ago
I agree.Im not a COD fanboy but this actually doesnt look like the COD franchise at all.Kind of looks like a new step in the right direction for the franchise.I do like how its directed into the future instead of the modern days for so many years.The graphics do look dated but at least there trying to mix it up.We will see how the fans of the franchise takes this new trailer since its something completely different.
TekoIie  +   1304d ago
So this is what happens when COD collides with Sci-fi?.... I have to admit.... Not that bad.

E3 will really decide whether this is a good idea for me. I cant believe people are trolling, they ask for a different game so COD goes to the future. Cant please some people...
STONEY4  +   1304d ago
Call of Duty: Human Revolution.

Seriously, what's with the gold colors? Looks like Treyarch has been playing a bit too much Deus Ex.

Although I'm glad they finally tried something new. Hopefully they reinvent the multiplayer formula that COD has been stuck on since 2007.
#1.4.2 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(1) | Report
iagainsti120  +   1304d ago
This is basically Homefront, with lots of shiny bits. Way to stay original COD.
#1.4.3 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(6) | Report
MrBeatdown  +   1303d ago
Agreed. Co-op mode aside, I wasn't a big fan of MW3, or Black Ops for that matter, but this looks like it could provide a nice level of freshness across the whole game. Being set in the future gives them a much greater level of creative freedom when it comes to things like perks or killstreaks.

I'm curious where this leaves Infinity Ward's next game. I figured the next logical step was Future Warfare, so I'm surprised Treyarch was allowed to make the jump first.

I'm not worried about the graphics, and I'm not sure why anyone else would be. We all know the series will get a massive upgrade for next-gen consoles. I'd rather see their tech guys working on delivering something really spectacular in fall 2013 with a launch title Call of Duty than see them waste their time trying to squeeze a little more out of six or seven year old hardware.
#1.4.4 (Edited 1303d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
PshycoNinja  +   1304d ago
Not only are the graphics out dated but the gameplay and art direction look like they are all over the place. Seriously whoever was the art director on this game should be let go because one minute its all colorful and the next it's all bland. Animation goes from decent looking to horrible in a flash.

This game screams inconstant. First off how does this game take place 20 years after Black Ops? Black ops went all the way up to the 50's - 70's. This game takes place in 2025. How is that 20 years?

Second those graphics are just ugh. My classmates and I (4 programmers) can do better and they cant even do art that well.

The concept seems all over the place (We go from mechs to horses? Who thought that was fun?).

If you thought this looked good than more power to you but I recommend playing other shooters before you consider this anywhere near good.

Now with that said, if they can address all of the above then it could be a decent game.
#1.5 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(16) | Report | Reply
bobshi  +   1303d ago
The game takes place in the 80s and 2025. Horses are in the 80s part.

That is also how you jump from the 60s to 2025.
brodychet  +   1304d ago
Interesting, at most.
mewhy32  +   1303d ago
Cant argue with a winning formula. They already have the best selling game of all time and this one will make them a mint as well. Probably will get this on Xbox for better graphics and online.
Beahmscream  +   1304d ago | Funny
Call of Duty: Black two the Future
#1.7 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(20) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
brodychet  +   1304d ago
xCaptainAmazing  +   1304d ago
As some who liked the first BO...
This just seems to completely unravel anything I liked. Normally, I was rating the more modern era of the games like this:

1. CoD4
2. MW2 (Multi) / BO (Single)
3. WaW
4. MW3

I thought even though the story in BO wasn't original, it was pretty well executed and the historical fiction aspect was great.

But, now they've taken a turn off a cliff into weird land and appear to have completely lost sight of what the series is/was.
Majin-vegeta  +   1304d ago
I'm not buying unless they have these in there>:|!!

Edit:I'm still not buying.
#1.9 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
chriski333  +   1304d ago
what the F$%K is this? i dont understand what happened,what did i just watch ? drones stealth planes, F&%king guys riding horses with futuristic guns? my head just started to hurt. this cant be real?
LOL_WUT  +   1303d ago
Yeah too much Terminator stuff going on robots, jets, futuristic weapons, choppers and horses. Meh
Trunkz Jr  +   1303d ago
I called it. I knew when they ran things dry they would move into a 2142 style future, now they'll milk Future Warfare...
Bobby Kotex  +   1303d ago
I don't play COD and haven't played since the MW2 letdown, but at least this looks different. To the people complaining about graphics what the hell do you expect? It's not like your Xbox magically upgraded. I also play on PC, and consoles stumped PC graphics as well.
Kaneda  +   1303d ago
I saw a little improvement in graphics... but still behind from their main competitor _ _ 3... assuming the gameplay is the same as others COD...
reznik_zerosum  +   1303d ago
Hard-Core gaming here :

Related image(s)
LUCKYXS7LEVEN  +   1303d ago
cool if they get the same feeling as COD 4 then by all means i'll drop 60 rocks but if i go and play the game at midnight and i see the same disaster as MW2,3, and BO online then i'm sticking with starhawk
geddesmond  +   1303d ago
Man that trailer sucked. The graphics are crap and I really ain't digging this whole future crap. Ah well theres still MOH this fall. COD fans enjoy.
Kanzes  +   1304d ago
You're equipped with a futuristic warfares but still riding a horses : / ?
#2 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(29) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
chaldo  +   1304d ago
For some reason I thought of the uncharted 3 trailer when the horses part popped up xD
Nitrowolf2  +   1304d ago
yeah everything for me was fine...until the horses came. Made me lol
-Alpha  +   1304d ago
Not just any horses: futuristic horses! They probably shoot lasers out of their eyes, or comprehend the English language, maybe even sniff out enemy heartbeats.
#2.3 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(25) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
360GamerFG  +   1304d ago
I expect so much more from your comments. That one just made you seem like. . .one of us. I'm Disappointed. :(
LolololRumz  +   1304d ago
It felt like they just mashed popular games together, some parts actually looked just like GTA IV
ChipChipperson  +   1304d ago
There could be a possibility that a part of the campaign might do what Black Ops did, with going back to the past in one level(Reznov). If that is the case, that part with the horses and seeing the Mi-24 fly over could be the Soviet Afghan War. You could be playing as a CIA operative(maybe an older Hudson) or an actual Mujahideen.
rustyspoon80  +   1303d ago
The horses are from flashbacks to the 80's. The story will have flashbacks ala Blops 1.
CVG has a massive feature on the game detailing all the modes. It sounds like Treyarch are actually implementing quite a few changes. Zombies will have 8 players and objectives in a full mode.
aDDicteD  +   1303d ago
same here. i didn't like the horse riding thing
ReservoirDog316  +   1303d ago
Could be because the robots turned against us? I don't know.

At least it doesn't look exactly like CoD4, mw2 and mw3.
ThatKanadianKid  +   1304d ago
laidenstar  +   1304d ago
It does look pretty dated graphically, but the military sci-fi aspects have me screaming "BUYBUYBUY!" with reckless abandon. Sadly.
ThichQuangDuck  +   1304d ago
It is unfortunate that it is a great scifi story that everyone wants to see in a game on an outdated engine, also a little ironic.
TheGamingArt  +   1304d ago
If this is on the Vita... I'll buy it. Otherwise, .... well... it's done for me.
Muffins1223  +   1304d ago
Technicly,this vita is between a ps2 and ps3.So that means it could run Black ops II at 30fps........
aviator189  +   1304d ago
I really don't want to buy into the hype again only to feel disappointed when the game come out, but the premise is certainly interesting for a Call of Duty game.
Reborn  +   1304d ago
Horses, that was totally unexpected.

Killsteak - Support Horses?

Well, you can tell the engine is indeed in need of a change. Does, kinda, look interesting though.
Swiggins  +   1304d ago
25 Killstreak - 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse, consider it the games version of a Tac-Nuke.
Hufandpuf  +   1304d ago
having hated the COD franchise since MW2. I can honestly say that this looks awesome. I would buy this. HOWEVER, the graphics hurt my eyes so much!

to clarify, I'm not touching the Multiplayer in this game. I'm sure that'll suck, but the SP looks interesting at least

Also, I hope DICE makes a BF2143 game. Hell BF2142 had better graphics than this

#8 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(13) | Report | Reply
ExCest  +   1304d ago
Exactly. This game has somewhat of an interesting story. Just that I don't and never will trust the Multiplayer ever again.
SignifiedSix  +   1304d ago
2142 have better graphics than this? Lmfao, good joke!

But i do want a 2143. Best battlefield in the series was 2142 IMO.
Hufandpuf  +   1304d ago
Nah, I think BF2 is the best in the franchise IMO. Not to many people play 2142 as much as bf2 now.
J_Cob  +   1304d ago
Yea, I hope DICE creates a BF3 2143 expansion like they did for Vietnam in Bad Company 2. Maybe after all the other expansions come out they'll do it. Even that dinosaur survival mode everybody wanted would be nice.
TheFinalEpisode  +   1304d ago
I was convinced I wasn't gonna buy this game but after seeing this I'm actually anticipating it now... I'm so gullible for epic music and awesome Tank Mechs :/
SKUD  +   1304d ago
Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.
LUCKYXS7LEVEN  +   1303d ago
but this one has a cat and a funky hat but set in the future
Baka-akaB  +   1304d ago
Since i dont care about cod so long as they dont try to evolve , i at least surprisingly raised my eyebrow enough to potentially borrow it and play the sp . But that's the extent of my "hype" thus far
NIRVANArazor  +   1304d ago
I am Buying D: me.. Buying a CoD game. What is the world coming too!!!! :'( *Hold Me*
BtnMshrTV   1304d ago | Spam
Skate-AK  +   1304d ago
Judging by people comments they are way more interested in BO2 than they were in MW2.
M1chl  +   1304d ago
I kinda hate myself to say this, but...my hype level came from "don't care" to "I want this". Graphics looks dated but other than that, I have to say I like what I watched in the trailer.
ShottySnipa417  +   1304d ago
Why should you hate yourself? Because of what most other people think? If you want it, get it. Don't let other people influence you to buy a game or not. That's stupid.
MattyG  +   1304d ago
for someone with a trollface as their avatar, you sure do make alot of sense. +bubble for you good sir!
#15.1.1 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report
torchic  +   1304d ago
+1 for you man well said.

we don't get wise comments like yours on N4G very often.
DarkPassenger  +   1304d ago
Instead of improving upon, they just keep pumping them out. Unless they have done something about anti-cheating, I'm out for good this time.
NIRVANArazor  +   1304d ago
did you even watch it???
TekoIie  +   1304d ago
ChunkyLover53  +   1304d ago
I figured people would hate on the game no matter what the game looked like. I don't know what trailer some of you saw, but from the one I watched, it looked pretty darn good.

This is obviously console footage and I think it looks 5x better than the original Black Ops, which used a modified World At War Engine. I remember thinking that MW2 looked better than BO and it was a year older.

It looks like they are using a modified Modern Warfare Engine for Black Ops 2. Treyarch seems to be really inventive lately, they took us through the cold war in the last game and now we get a completely different setting that looks really slick.

People will hate, but I'm seeing a ton of positive reaction from even the biggest haters. I think this might be a pretty good entry. I think Treyarch has finally surpassed IW when it comes to quality.

Color me impressed, and I wasn't the biggest COD fan, and I don't buy every single one, but this one has my interest.
BLow  +   1304d ago
Man, it's a love hate relationship with me and COD, but PS3 users(regular) just got the first content drop and they're already announcing the next game. Crazy...Every year I tell myself that this will be the year that I'm not buying COD but some strange "force" makes me do otherwise..haha..Oh well, game on people and play whatever you enjoy.
Angels3785  +   1304d ago
OMG...this could be sooooooo much better with a NEW ENGINE!!!!!!!!!!
supraking951  +   1304d ago
so i multiplayer instead of a helicopter kill streak we'll get a futuristic airship that will do the same thing? Revolutionary
Summons75  +   1304d ago
Soooo Metal Gear Recon: Blops 2.....got it!

This is an example of why creativity is almost dead, shitty yearly game now ripping off good games while not upgrading or getting a new engine...*sigh* oh activision how you will never learn
chobit_A5HL3Y  +   1303d ago
learn what??? lolz they're progressively making more money with each new cod. if anything, it's the gamers who need to learn...
Summons75  +   1303d ago
your right, gamers need to learn how crap is. Tell me 5 things that call of duty did that was innovative after call of duty 4. The correct answer is nothing!
Ascalon94  +   1304d ago
hmm if this release on the Vita then I will get it otherwise, we will wait and see. I just want to know how this will carry over from black ops 1.
BizDaWolf  +   1304d ago
I don't know about this one.........I'm going to pass on this
MattyG  +   1304d ago
Yay Woods is in a nursing home! i was right! wait what? the Vault? what is this shit?! weird name for a nursing home but oh well the game looks awesome. now if we can fly those jets...

EDIT: also, i don't think this site is correct. If it was set 20 years after black ops wouldnt it be the 1980's or 90's?
#24 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
ShottySnipa417  +   1303d ago
Actually, there will be a point in time where the game will take place in the '80s. But the majority will be in 2025.
MattyG  +   1303d ago
Yeah, I just read that on Kotaku this morning. Sounds like they're trying for a varied experience. Can't wait for the gameplay reveal tonight!
user5467007  +   1304d ago
Looks more or less the same

Here we go...it's going to get perfect scores again and then 4-5 months after release

"Ahhh....it's wasn't that good"

Sorry but if a game hardly changes then it should be marked down, tiny differences don't make a difference. I hope Halo 4 wipes the floor with this.
LUCKYXS7LEVEN  +   1303d ago
i hope halo can but it's been 2 years since then and call of duty been around every year and kids go for what cool with everyone in school .
ShottySnipa417  +   1304d ago
It's always the trailers...
...that hype people so much. Then it hits retail, people initially love it, then after a month, hate on it. It's a cycle.
Unlimax  +   1304d ago

. . . no really it was a good comment :3
M-M  +   1304d ago
I'm going to keep my mouth shout until I actually see some multiplayer gameplay.
allyc4t  +   1304d ago
That engine is starting to look really outdated. Surely Treyarch could do better.
Gamer-Z  +   1304d ago
That looked really bad, like wii graphics bad.
#29 (Edited 1304d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(12) | Report | Reply
Oldman100  +   1304d ago
Another Michael Bay explosion fest of a trailer. Not interested in the slightest. The only way they are going to get my attention is if they show zombies mode and footage of the ps3 version running properly.
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

December 2015 PS4, PS3 & PS Vita New Releases in North America and Europe

7m ago - PSLS runs down all of the new releases coming to PlayStation platforms throughout the month of De... | PS3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Review | Throwing Digital Sheep

26m ago - Treyarch Studio’s latest release, Call of Duty: Black Ops 3, takes players to a dark, dystopian f... | PS4

HotLiked - What the Internet is talking about right now

Now - Kill some time at HotLiked.com. You will regret it... | Promoted post

All Nyko Products 20% Off Starting Black Friday

2h ago - EB: Nyko has announced that it will offer 20% off all of its products starting Black Friday and r... | Tech

Nerdist Review: Bloodborne's The Old Hunters DLC is Worth Every Bloody Penny

3h ago - Nerdist: Earlier this year, I raved about how great FromSoftware’s PS4-exclusive Bloodborne was.... | PS4

Itch.io to Host Celebratory Loading Screen Jam

4h ago - Indie game site Itch.io has announced it will host Loading Screen Jam starting this Friday to cel... | PC