This must see video shows off dynamic gameplay from the single player part of the game.
Is it me, graphics looks better in singleplayer than multiplayer? It sure looks like it Hope we can see some PC gameplay please, since my PC is not dead yet spec wise :)
Isn't it widely accepted that graphics in SP are better than MP? Anyone nice video.
Perhaps he meant to say the reverse.
If you remember GRAW singleplayer had awesome graphics but in myltiplayer it was just average.
Many levels in mp of BF3 looks quite as good as the singleplayer. I do remember graw sp was better visually than mp. That was my point :)
Gears 3 graphics online are better than the single player. But I guess that's to be expected since every bit of dlc is upgraded code...
I find it depends on the developer, Epic Games and Guerrilla Games both managed to maintain the stunning visuals of Gears of War and Killzones graphics in the multiplayer...
@WrAiTh Sp3cTr3, part of the reason was that Gears 3 multiplayer levels are a smaller than that of single player, hence devs can insert more details. It question of choice large levels with low details or small levels with very high level of details.
Pretty sure its been like that in the Advanced warfighter series too. Seriously though, i cant wait for this game!
my interest about this game has been going up and up, and i know i will be playing this for all the wrong reason Single player. So here is hoping atleast the story is decent
I've been having a blast with this, looking forward to others getting their hands on it at release to give the co-op a good going over.
How do you get access to the demo??
Conviction. And it's not very good. Doesn't feel like GR at all
You have to be a PS plus subscriber. Trust me, this game is fun and ley those crybabies who cheat,camp,boost whatever stick to COD. The game at times reminds me of SOCOM with a little twist. Just give it a shot if your a PS plus subscriber. If you dont like it, at least you gave it a try and naybe you like something a little more fast pace like Battlefield. This game takes patience and if you dont have it, this is not for you but like I said...give it a go, I did and I love it.
Boring. I'm getting tired of these tightly controlled shooters. Or shooters in general. How many times do publishers expect players to want this sort of Black OP/ Espionage / Tom Clancy Spy Thriller / Special Squad / Stealth Counter-terrorist game. Where are my damn wizards. Developers are so worried about giving the new batch of middle school tween gamers the same game they gave us, that they forget we're still here. And we outnumber the new guys 10 to 1.
There are plenty of other games to play to suit all tastes. I think you're being a little melodramatic.
No, I'm not. You could say I was being melodramatic if I said I cried during the end of MGS4 or Heavy Rain or if I said my jaw dropped while watching a trailer for something or if I said I wet my pants. That would be melodramatic. The word you're looking for is "cynical." I was being cynical.
kaveti6616 You're "being" stupid. Most games don't play like this. Anyone who complains about there not being enough of a genre 99% of the time just isn't looking in the right direction.
You say that like changing the setting would change much. Uncharted is still a TPS like so many out there. Unless it's Vanquish or RE4, most TPS games feel pretty damn close.
Meh, there are countless little quirks, mechanics, and value changes that make no two games play exactly the same. Often times a game will feel different and one can't describe what makes it so.
"Where are my damn wizards." has a crying melodramatic feel to it. As to the answer to your question... you have simply to look for Skyrim, Risen 2, The Witcher 2, Two Worlds 2, etc.. Many games out already and coming out in the near future that give you your Wizards and such. As for me... I am one of the old guys and I enjoy my FPS games like BF3 and Flashpoint. And I like my Wizards new school as in Mass Effect, just as much as the old school Skyrim Wizards.
I don't think kaveti knows what cynical means if he thinks he was being cynical.
im only lookin forward to single player and coop. adversal is garbage imo. i just cant get the hang of it. idk if its the slow controls or whatever, but when the enemy is moving my controller cant keep up :/ why the hell is that and how many times has this game been delayed? fix it damnit
Looks pretty boring to me. Horrible AI too.
The AI isn't perfect in a game with larger environments? Wow, say it isn't so! The AI is ridiculously stupid in 99.9% of shooters. The pace of the game is also clearly not for you, whats unfortunate is that attitudes like this ruined what Ghost Recon actually was, a long time a go. A difficult, thinking mans shooter that rewarded long forgotten things...like patience.
This game rewards strategy too! Get the kill or take time and risk your life hacking him to reveal locations of ALL other enemies AND then get your kill. This game rewards patience and strategy!
I said "to me", didn't I? It's called an opinion. In my opinion, he spent most of his time walking around doing nothing. It's EXTREMELY passive. To top it off, he walks in clear sight of them and they don't notice? They have camo but it's not that good. You can clearly see them. Oh, and then there's the sound of your silenced weapon. They would have heard that too. Silenced guns aren't silent. Oh, and don't forget not seeing their own guys being taken from behind. How do they not notice that? If you want to play it, have at it. Way too passive for me and the AI is so dumb that it takes any real strategy out of the game.
killzone 2 and 3 had very good AI for a FPS, wasnt like "hey, there's the guy who bought this game, let kill him" it was a team work against you
Try running towards enemy with a knife in Killzone 2. You will then probably see how stupid they are and how the "Teamwork" smoke and mirrors falls apart. They just can't properly cope with melee.
try running with the knife on Hard to see how far you will make it
Made it just fine through about 50% of the game - that's how I played from the start. The only times where this didn't work was when other enemies were scattered in far away places and shot me while knifing another AI. But The AI inability to act on close proximity threats is a plain fail. Every time I had only one enemy left to fight with the process became a cakewalk because they simply could not retaliate.
I really like this franchise and i will be really looking to this game.
Looks ok, but sneaking around in daylight lol. What are the a.i, fuking blind,lol.
They're using active camo...
Active camo or not, they are clearly visible. Maybe not as much without it, but you can still easily see them. It's nowhere near as good as the Predator's in the movies and you could still see him when he got close enough.
the outcome of the acual military tech in the works is only suppost to bend light for a few seconds,at the least,,, 20 yards away. after a few seconds the active camo soldier can come into focus for the enemy. thats the acual tech in the works and it should be like that in the game. seems a lil more grounded in reality. completely invisible is way too sifi, i dont like it. i hope you can be seen sometimes in the game
Most of the stuff I've seen of this makes it look far too easy. This pretty much looks like playing MGS with stealth camo on, with squad mates telling you where guys are and killing them if you get in trouble. Looks like you die pretty fast at least but also looks too easy just to walk past, or mark everyone in the area. Tbh, still looks pretty fun but if there's no challenge I don't think I'd enjoy the whole game.
Video won't work :(
So basically it's the first Crysis in 3rd person with shitty AI. I'm calling it right now: Game of the Year, folks.
This is what I thought too "Crysis 3rd Person".
You say that like crysis was something special. They are both just shooters that have an invisible suit. I guess Fallout 3 must be the same as well, it has guns and you can get an invisible suit when crouched!
You say crysis wasn't special? Well it put you in a suit that could let you use 1 major ability at a time, customize weapons on the go... and beyond pretty and revolutionary graphics... you could use your environment for a lot of stuff. Maximum real time if you know what I mean. There isn't a lot in that game that you can not break, move, interact with or alter in some way. I use to put a pack of c4 on something that will roll and I will send it down a hill and blow up an angry mob of triggerhappy soldiers as they race towards me! that is such an epic thing to do and Crysis is one of the few games that let me do stuff like that. Enough said! :)
I was referring to how DwigthOwen thought Ghost Recon was like Crysis simply by the fact that it has an invisible suit, which many other games have. I have played through Crysis many times, no need to explain to me how the game is played.
Should've let us kill the civilians. It was a legitimate tactic.
There are only two gameplay styles. This video is just variations of Stealth and Direct.
Really liking the looks of this. Glad they put some extra time in, I think it really paid off.
Nice weapon demo, add this with the co-op online and I found my go to game with buddies. I like they showed the big brother to the hk416.
The beta is about as dynamic as a horse's ass.
Did... did he just say that he was going to shit himself at 4:37? :) Nah but seriously, think I might enjoy this game. Awaiting reviews.
Have u guys/girls actually played the series? This is exactly the same gameplay only with stealth camo introduced, but in this vid it doesn't seem to alter or enhance the gameplay much. We will see how it really pans out in the game. Anyways, i loved the other games and most of all the Ubisoft titles. Stop whining so much, if ur bored or dissatisfied, go find another hobby.
it's GRAW whats not to like.
That looks like the worst AI I have seen in a long, long time. What's the point of them even being there if there that stupid. They've ruined Ghost Recon for the sake of the stupid casual gamer.
Hmmm.. Not really a must see, I saw nothing new here. You can use stealth, mark targets, blast away, or go around. Tps, coversystem, steathsuit, don't kill civilians, blind AI, pipelined progress... I'm sorry, but I don't see it. And he really didn't even command his troops, so there didn't seem to be much strategy either. They followed you automatically, they shot the targets you marked, and for that they desided where to go and where to take the shot. He didn't interract them at all besides the fact you stare at enemy and the game will kill them for you. On second tought maybe that's the "must see" in it, you don't have to worry about these "frustrating" things, iyt is, *drums*, more appealing to the casual-gamer. I would had preferred a way more tactical/strategic line. Don't know if there is, since they didn't show it.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.